Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 2 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 4/2/10

Bill Moyers talks with Gretchen Morgenson about the financial crisis and its likely return

By       (Page 6 of 11 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.     (# of views)   4 comments
Author 8235
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Richard Clark
Become a Fan
  (109 fans)

The extent to which AIG had gotten into this risky business was a total shock at even the highest level of federal regulators in Washington, who were obviously asleep at the wheel.

So, why is Congress not now talking about putting these things on an open and public exchange?

They're not talking about it because these banks make enormous amounts of money facilitating such trades, creating these swaps (as these insurance policies are called) for their customers, allowing them to continuously trade while taking a healthy cut as the middle man. They don't want transparency. They make more money from opacity. They don't want people to be able to see what these insurance polices are trading at, because at the moment they do that, the spreads would narrow, and their huge profits would be greatly reduced. This kind of trading in the dark provides an enormously profitable (if risky) business for them. And they are still gambling that they will have the taxpayer to bail them out again if things should go awry. After all, they're still "to-big-to-fail."

Could this business, unregulated as it continues to be, without the transparency it cries out for, really bring us down yet again?

Absolutely. As already stated, what has been proposed is to make these risky insurance policies be traded through some kind of clearinghouse. But perhaps not all of the policies, only the most simple of them, would have to contend with that clearinghouse. The more exotic of these "swaps' (where I make an agreement with you to buy or sell something, some stream of income), those might not have to be done via a clearinghouse. So, you're still going to have an enormous amount of this stuff trading behind the curtain, without the knowledge of any regulatory agency.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11


Must Read 2   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Richard Clark Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was Pat Tillman Murdered by an American Sharpshooter to Shut Him up?

New JFK assassination bombshells

Two U.S. presidents implicated by ex-CIA black-ops assassin

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense

Four Ticking Time Bombs That Will Soon Ignite a Revolution

The Ultimate Goal of the Bankster-led Political-economic Warfare Being Waged Against Us Is . . . ?