I realize that, as Bev (Harris) points out, a real "audit" would be significantly broader and include the full panoply of chain of custody issues, etc., but in practice as I see it, this broader evaluation either doesn't occur at all because it's not fully mandated, or else problems that DO occur or rather are found by the audit's broader provisions do NOT result in any remedy or result that changes anything or results in any consequences.
Many people feel confident with optical scan systems since they are used in school exams. They fail to recognize, tho, that test results can be directly questioned by a student whose name is on a specific test answer sheet. This is not possible with anonymous ballots.
~
Trust Has No Place in Public Elections
~
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
