Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 39 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds      

HR 811 (The Holt Bill): Time to put us out of its misery

By       (Page 4 of 4 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   6 comments

Michel Collins
Message Nancy T
Become a Fan
  (8 fans)

Effective Date State Plan: February, 2008

Effective Date Implementation: General Election November 2008



2. In support of the principle of fiscal responsibility and stabilization of state governmental administration, checks and balances and citizen oversight:

BUYOUT funding for states wishing to replace DRE systems with paper-based voting systems.
(BUYOUT funding can be applied to paper ballot, optical scan voting systems, paper ballot, hand count systems, or a combination thereof. In the case of buyout funding as applied to hand count systems, training costs may be included.)

(Compliance to be determined by each state in a state plan process that supports the standards for democratic elections, those being citizen oversight and security, and which process includes diverse stakeholders group including citizen representation, published plans, and consequences for noncompliance. State Plans will be published in the Federal Register.)
Effective Date: February, 2008



3. In support of the principle of checks and balances:
Dissolution of EAC and reallocation of its functional responsibilities to appropriate representational groups (as described below)

Effective Date: January 2008



4. In support of the principle of fiscal responsibility and stabilization of state governmental administration:
Prohibition on any additional unfunded mandates being added into the bill

Effective Date: Upon passage

5. In support of the ninth amendment that no single right can trample or trounce others: Appropriations for real study, with real stakeholders including citizen representation and broad range of disability activists, election officials, and other solution makers, to find consensus, practical, implementable solutions to support the often conflicting voting rights of citizen oversight, security, accuracy, and accessibility.

Effective Date: Upon passage


Reallocation of EAC Responsibilities:

  • Generate technical guidance on the administration of federal elections.
    – HAND OVER TO NIST & STANDARDS BOARD WITH CITIZEN REPRESENTATION
  • Produce voluntary voting systems guidelines.
    – HAND OVER TO NIST & STANDARDS BOARD WITH CITIZEN REPRESENTATION
  • Research and report on matters that affect the administration of federal elections.
    – HAND OVER TO STANDARDS BOARD & CITIZENS GROUP
  • Otherwise provide information and guidance with respect to laws, procedures, and technologies affecting the administration of Federal elections.
    – HAND OVER TO STANDARDS BOARD & CITIZENS GROUP
  • Administer payments to States to meet HAVA requirements.
    – HAND OVER TO GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
  • Provide grants for election technology development and for pilot programs to test election technology.
    – ELIMINATE THIS FUNCTION.
  • Manage funds targeted to certain programs designed to encourage youth participation in elections.
    – HAND OVER TO DEPT. OF EDUCATION
  • Develop a national program for the testing,certification, and decertification of voting systems.
    – HAND OVER TO NIST & STANDARDS BOARD WITH CITIZEN REPRESENTATION
  • Maintain the national mail voter registration form that was developed in accordance with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA), report to Congress every two years on the impact of the NVRA on the administration of federal elections, and provide information to States on their responsibilities under that law.
    – HAND BACK TO FEC
  • Audit persons who received federal funds authorized by HAVA from the General Services Administration or the Election Assistance Commission.
    – HAND OVER TO GSA, USING INSPECTOR GENERAL
  • Submit an annual report to Congress describing EAC activities for the previous fiscal year.
    – HAND OVER AS APPROPRIATE TO ENTITIES PICKING UP FUNCTIONS AS DESCRIBED ABOVE
  • Certification, recertification and decertification of voting machines - DELEGATE TO THE STATES

 

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Nancy T Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

NH recounts no check and balance for its privatized corporate-controlled elections

NH Secretary of State: "Citizen Election Observers Threaten Election Integrity"

Summary of the Stimulus bill - Don't look half bad to me

The Myth of Verified Voting: How GOP strategists & J. Abramoff transformed America's elections & the reform movement

Fitzwilliam, NH to Vote on Prohibiting Concealed Vote Counts

Secret vote counting and the lost art of democratic elections

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend