Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 68 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   
  

Taking a Proper Gander at Sean Hannity

By       (Page 3 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   2 comments
Author 3098
Editor

Gustav Wynn
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Gustav Wynn
Become a Fan
  (23 fans)

Beyond ethics, I assert that this, in the context of political talk, is unpatriotic, unbrotherly and more akin to the media control found in both communist and fascist states where radio does not reflect popular attitudes.
If, on the other hand you do not believe Hannity broadcasts propaganda, please go with God! I read recently where there were two kinds of Republicans today - millionaires, and suckers. But this saying may be unfair to Eisenhower Republicans, because there was a day when strict ethics, fiscal responsibility and small government meant just that.

After Reagan began steering the party, however, we saw a shift. The ethics of right versus wrong came to be replaced with the "win at all costs" struggle of us versus them. First them meant communists, but later it was anyone who was sitting on resources we wanted, and eventually, those who do not agree with us.

This brand of anti-Conservative "Conservatism", called Neo-Conservatism, preached a two-faced, duplicitous fiscal policy to go with it's two-faced morality. The economy would be stimulated by constant government interference, in the form of tax cuts for the wealthy, union busting, rampant deregulation, corporate "welfare" bail-outs and runaway corporate-government-lobbying incest or constant tweaking by the Fed. What part of "free market" didn't they understand?

Chiefly coming through the defense spending Eisenhower warned against, the U.S. government began an economic policy that swept a growing federal deficit under the rug.

The prevailing justification for this among politicians (and their cronies in business) was that their personal wealth would insulate their families. So the steps taken to "stovepipe" wealth upwards included instituting a media arm that mesmerizes millions into acceptance and bites off the head of anyone who suggests even incremental change back to 50s-era wealth distribution, shrieking they are Marxists, pinkos, socialists, unpatriotic, or worse yet - liberals, their new term for them.

Just as our "representatives" in the Senate pull down incomes many times higher then the average American, Hannity cannot possibly understand the plight of the middle class taxpayer today, cannot represent the views of someone who would benefit from redistributing the tax cuts to make the wealthy contribute more fairly.

Hannity repeated a few times last week the notion that America is a place where anyone can succeed, provided they work hard, study and sacrifice, putting in 14 to 16 hour work days. That sounds like a place where people might burn out early from hypertension as they grow estranged from their families. Is money really everything in American life today?

As spokesman for the rich, Hannity begs the question - is he a wolf in sheep's clothing? He advocates tax cuts for the rich in order to create jobs for the middle class. But think about this for a moment - the rich get cash and the middle class gets jobs? Many historians and economists agree this is a ruse - we could simply provide tax credits to those who create jobs in one direct step! The rich, acting as gatekeeping middleman between tax breaks and jobs are favored with greater power and leverage then the rest of us, no?

Consider that the government and their corporate donors are all rich themselves, including Hannity, who is raking in a reported $125 million for his current five year contract. He may fancy himself an everyday joe, but sits among the wealthiest upper class, persuading struggling millions for "three hours a day" to trust him. His economic "plan" assumes the rich, once given tax breaks will create jobs out of the goodness of their hearts. As we see, however, American corporations have been doing the opposite, shipping jobs overseas to save on labor costs, dismantling plants and unions within our borders, resulting in less and worse jobs.

Hannity tells us social programs and entitlements are the reason taxes are so high. But as Reagan once said, "the facts show otherwise". It's been the NeoCon Bush administration that has outspent any other, running huge annual shortfalls and tacking the cost of multiple wars and economic stimulus lump-sum payments onto the deficit for our kids and grandkids to figure out. And it's defense spending that eats into our current budget, more then any other consideration, more then any other country spends, and certainly isn't providing adequately for military families. Privatized food-services workers in Iraq are making more in "hazard pay" then the GIs doing the fighting.

Just as Eisenhower warned, defense contractors want our hard-earned tax money, robbing our ability to build schools, repair roads and bridges, or to send our brightest to college to shore up American competitiveness in science and engineering. Hannity blinds us to Ike's admonishment daily, supporting NeoCon war hawks and Reaganomics together without any care to reduce the debt we owe to China, Japan and the Saudis with insane interest piling on by the minute. 

Suppose we take a look not how Hannity is at odds with liberals, but how he is at odds with true Conservatism - fiscal responsibility, strict ethics and small, unintrusive government. I see exactly the opposite from this administration, with Sean Hannity as it's brilliantly deceptive mouthpiece, saying one thing as they are doing another. If you let your own common sense guide you, it's easy to see that Hannity is selling you out - unless, of course, you are a millionaire.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Gustav Wynn Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

(OpEdNews Contributing Editor since October 2006) Inner city schoolteacher from New York, mostly covering media manipulation. I put election/finance reform ahead of all issues but also advocate for fiscal conservatism, ethics in journalism and (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Limbaugh/Hannity Parent Company Admits Hiring Actors to Call Radio Shows

The #OWS Video Rupert Murdoch Doesn't Want You To See

LocalLeaks' Charges of Cover-Up by Parents, Police in Steubenville Rape Forces Official Response [Updated]

Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck Respond To Report That Parent Company Hires Actors for Call-ins

#OWS Cheers As Defiant Judge Stops Obama From Selling Immunity To Wall Street

Obama to Grant Banks Robosigning Immunity in Showdown With Breakaway AGs [Updated]

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend