47 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 12 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

U.S. National Security: Divorce Venezuela, Marry Brazil

By       (Page 3 of 7 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   11 comments
Message Brock Novak
As for Brazil, while the article might suggest Brazil being NSS green given its promotion by the Analyst for the U.S. to align with, it is anything but. In fact, Brazil is yellow at best and maybe even flashing yellow, suggesting much work to do, coupled with the added sense of urgency to do so with China and Russia knocking on Brazil's door. Both are extremely interested in strategic partnering with Brazil. Its national security relevance to the U.S. accordingly, grows more significant by the day. 

Interestingly though, friction between Venezuela and Brazil is rapidly growing (in fact, getting quite serious) as each jockey for overall Latin American supremacy. The U.S. would be well served in its relationship building efforts and strategy (see SWOOP plan later in article) by playing that "enemy (U.S) of my enemy (Venezuela) is my (Brazil) friend" card/aspect, in leveraging a strong partnership relationship with Brazil.

With superpower potential, Brazil takes a big step forward in that coveted direction, thrusting itself onto the world stage with its overnight transformation into one of the world's top 10 oil producers. With that too, it becomes a potential new, high value chip in the escalating poker match between Venezuela (and China) and the U.S.

The recent announcement by the Brazilian oil company Petrobras of a massive find in the Atlantic Ocean off Rio de Janeiro in the Tupi field, catapults Brazil to the elite tier of global oil producing countries. Specifically, on Nov. 9, 2007 the Associated Press reported Petrobras President Sergio Gabrielli at a news conference on the find being quoted as saying "the oil from ultradeep areas, including the Tupi field, would give Brazil the world's eighth-largest oil and gas reserves. Brazil's reserves will lie somewhere between those of Nigeria and those of Venezuela." The same report noted Brazil's current (pre-Tupi) 17th in the world ranking with 14.4 billion barrels of oil equivalent (i.e. reserves).

On the heels of a string of key discoveries in recent years, with this by far the largest, Brazil marches into the top ranks of oil producing nations. The company conservatively estimates the Tupi field to possess 8 billion barrels in reserves. Some outside analysts think a great deal more, perhaps twice as much. That in addition to even greater unexplored reserve potential in these offshore fields still to be discovered by Petrobras.

Interestingly, this discovery makes Brazil an even more desired strategic partner for the U.S. than ever before, and adds even more impetus for the U.S. to prioritize and aggressively court Brazil – for additional reasons at the end of this and a coming artcle. With this oil find and upon it being operational, Brazil would become a substantial net exporter, able to now fully satisfy its own domestic energy needs, yet with substantial reserves remaining to export. Thus the ideal opportunity for the U.S. to break an increasingly unpredictable and adversarial populist run Venezuela's energy (and related political bullying) grip on it by now doing what Venezuela thought never would – Terminating Venezuelan oil contracts and strategically shifting those geographic sourced U.S. oil supply needs from Venezuela to Brazil, even though the flow of oil can't start right away – see development discussion below.

Analyst Note: The recommendation to shift any part of the U.S. oil supply to another third party country, in this case Brazil, does not usurp the Analyst's broader and longer term view for the U.S. to continually and aggressively strive for energy self sufficiency vis-a-vis diversified and enhanced domestic oil and gas exploration/production, nuclear power and alternative fuels and energy sources.

In doing so, does Venezuela really care? Does Venezuela really think it will hurt? The answers are yes and yes.

Yes, from the standpoint the U.S. is (currently) far and away Venezuela's largest customer, yet ironically its most irresponsibly abused customer. Evidence Venezuela's renewed threats the last few days to cut off oil to the U.S., it clearly enjoys the game, which would not exist if the U.S. was not a customer. Yes too, in that the U.S. (currently) accounts for 50-60% of Venezuela's daily production. That equates to approx. 1.4-1.5 million barrels per day out of a total 2.5 million barrels per day Venezuelan production rate according to Wikipedia. Note these numbers were for 2006. Other limited data suggests in 2007 that Venezuelan production and U.S. imports have each fallen some, but for discussion purposes, still at generally the same percentage levels.

The Energy Information Administration (EIA), which provides Official Energy Statistics from the U.S. Government shows 2007 U.S. crude imports running at approximately 420 million barrels per month or approximately 14 million barrels per day. Therefore Venezuela is supplying 10% or more of U.S. import need.

It's important to note that Venezuela is not comfortably resting on its laurels and/or caustic rhetoric. While it continues to make threats of cutting off U.S. oil supplies, it has increasing strategic buyer flexibility to actually do so. It has aggressively sought alternative buyers, including China, even at a higher cost. That additional cost in the form of additional refining and transportation expense. The U.S. refineries used by Venezuela are built to process the less desirable (than light sweet crude) heavy sulfurous crude which Venezuela mostly produces. China's refineries generally are not. It takes 5 days to transport the crude to the U.S. It takes 30 days to tanker to China. It will cost significant sums to build these new heavy crude refineries, and the differential transportation cost for a trip 6x's as long is significant too.

Supporting the point on alternative markets, a Feb. 26, 2006 NY Times article states "the threats out of Caracas have not been lost on the White House, high-ranking American military officials and Republicans in Congress, who in public hearings and closed-door sessions have addressed both Mr. Chávez's warnings about diversifying oil markets and China's increasing role in Latin America"......."I think they're not as quick to dismiss his bluster as they used to be," said Michael Shifter, a senior analyst at the Inter-American Dialogue, a Washington policy group that follows American-Venezuelan relations.

A point on Chavez' "cut the oil off threats". These are really a reflection or indicator of just how really vulnerable he knows Venezuela is to the U.S., with the U.S. at 50% of his production base. With exports estimated by many to be approximately 70-75% of production, the remaining approximately 600-700, 000 barrels per day is targeted for domestic consumption. The essential U.S. lock on total production (and why the U.S. has incredible untapped leverage) is precisely why Chavez is now scrambling to diversify his export customer base (to China and elsewhere) and over time completely dis-enfranchise the U.S. from that export base. His tactic, which the U.S. does not apparently recognize is the age old "the best defense is a good offense". That offense in the form of intimidating and threatening bullying rhetoric. The U.S. should take away only one thing when Chavez embarks on those wild rants. That is he knows it's he (Venezuela), and NOT the U.S. that is vulnerable, and precisely why the U.S. should realize it possesses the leverage in the relationship, not Venezuela. With that recognition, the U.S. should turn the tables and push back hard - now.

Here's the disturbing supporting facts behind the threats noted above. The June 11, 2007 Xinhua News Agency release noted "China to expand its oil exploration activities in the (Venezuelan) Orinoco River region.....with an investment of 'billions of US dollars"...China will cooperate with the Venezuelan side to build three refineries in China with a total capacity of processing 800,000 barrels of Venezuelan heavy crude per day, which would be likely completed in two or three years...Chavez emphasized that Venezuela and China would also establish a joint oil shipping company to carry crude and other products between the two countries, and do business in the Caribbean and take shipments to Africa... With these moves, China has become a strategic partner of Venezuela, which will help the country (Venezuela) reduce dependence on oil export to the U.S.........At present, the U.S is still the biggest oil customer of Venezuela......Chavez said China is set to replace the U.S. as Venezuela's top oil buyer, as Venezuela plans to raise oil export to China to one million barrels a day by 2012 from its current level of about 150,000 barrels a day".

China is leveraging that developing relationship and toehold/anchor point with Venezuela as a springboard to spread its influence and investment dollars throughout Latin America. So keep in mind, the Venezuela/U.S. brouhaha in the global scheme of things is really about China too, and its grab for greater economic and political control in this hemisphere. China brings with it, its own global ambitions and political and economic challenges for the U.S. to address. Therefore, the way to deal with China in this hemisphere is to prevent it from getting a real foothold in Venezuela. By default, that means upsetting President Hugo Chavez' applecart wherever possible.

In that regard, this recommended "immediate" change of supply (contract, not immediate oil flow) from Venezuela to Brazil is a major way to play that. By doing so, it severely impacts and/or destabilizes Venezuela's at least short term (and ripple effect to the longer term) domestic and international agenda and ambitions, as they are fueled and financed with oil revenues. Again, the Veneuelan heavy crude is not desirable, so it becomes much more of a challenge to re-direct it elsewhere (if U.S. terminates contract). His recent announcement to conduct a sweeping revision of the Constitution and create massive new social programs, will be hugely costly. Much if not all of these new expenditures to be financed by (re)nationalized oil asset revenues.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Brock Novak Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

The cleverest of all, is the man who calls himself a fool at least once a month - Fyodor Dostoyevsky It is a curious fact that people are never so trivial as when they take themselves seriously...Some cause happiness wherever (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Proposed Somali Pirate Solution: The B.O.S.S Plan (aka Operation S.O.S. – Shoot On Sight)

Chinese Submarine Tangles With Destroyer USS John McCain – Intentional? Navy Says No. Analyst Says Yes.

The "Pakistani Power Pendulum" (The Real "3P's") - Military to Civilian....and Back - Again

End the Somali Pirate Problem Once and For All - Mr. Obama, Implement the "B.O.S.S. Plan" - Now

Proposed UN North Korea Strategy: Ignore (aka "Rope a Dope")

Russian Ukrainian Trojan Horse? Yes, But Not The Press Speculated One

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend