As it became clear that the questioner assumed there was time for a Delta Force or fighter planes based outside of Libya to get to Benghazi in time to make a difference, Sec. Panetta described the forces available in the region, and then explained:
But
-- but the basic principle here -- basic principle is that you don't deploy
forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on; without having some
real-time information about what's taking place. And as a result of not having
that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area,
General Ham, General Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put
forces at risk in that situation".
This -- this happened within a few hours and it was really over before,
you know, we had the opportunity to really know what was happening.
In his CBS appearance October 28, Sen. McCain indirectly supported the Pentagon explanation when he said, "obviously there was no military either capability or orders to intervene in a seven-hour fight." [emphasis added] Even though McCain says the fight was much longer than it actually was, he concludes there was no capability for any more military support than was provided. And he implies that there were no orders because such orders would have been pointless.
Fox's Unconscionable Claim from Anonymous
Source
On October 26, Fox News cited anonymous sources to support a claim "that an urgent request from the CIA annex for military back-up during the attack on the U.S. consulate and subsequent attack several hours later on the annex itself was denied by the CIA chain of command"." According to Fox, the request was made after midnight from the CIA annex in Benghazi and asked for a Spectre gunship that was based 480 miles away in Italy. To make the story seem credible, Fox stated falsely that "fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours"."
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
