Police Break in, Shoot Woman 3 Times after She Calls 911

First, Mr. Wyland claimed Bramuchi hid the gun in the house but no gun was found after an extensive police search

Second, no other voice or any type of argument is heard in the background at any time during the call

Third, Wyland falsely claimed that Bramuchi had called 911 to report that he attacked her

Fourth, Wyland incorrectly claimed he was a boyfriend although he had known her only two weeks

Fifth, Wyland, who admitted to having DUIs, sounds intoxicated and uses the "F word" 13 times

Sixth, Wyland's statement is barely legible and also shows characteristics of intoxication

Ms. Bramuchi had left her own home to avoid further conflict with her new roommate and was stopped in her car on her street by Alpharetta officer D. Capps. When asked what happened she could not say anything since her new bond condition that intended to prevent her from "harassing" Alpharetta police explicitly stated for her not to have any communication with them except under an emergency. Lt. Stewart interviewed John Wyland and told Officer Capps that there was enough probable cause to arrest Ms. Bramuchi despite the questionable 911 call. Alpharetta police towed her car from her own street and impounded it, thus creating over $1000 in storage fees that Ms. Bramuchi cannot pay.

Officer Capps swore out a witness statement "from personal knowledge" that Ms. Bramuchi had committed Aggravated Assault and Possession of a Firearm with Intent to Commit a Felony even though no gun was ever found. His sworn statement also strongly implies that the Mr. Wyland informed him of the accusations against Ms. Bramuchi although Officer Capps was not even present while Lt. Stewart interviewed him. Thus, Officer Capps had no real "personal knowledge" of the charges against Ms. Bramuchi even though he was the arresting officer.

Although Wyland's admissions, the discrepancies in his statements and Officer Capps improper sworn witness statement all demonstrate that the new charges will not likely be found credible in a court of law, the DA office used the opportunity to indict Ms. Bramuchi without bond. This accomplished the objective ADA McAuley failed to achieve at the June 26 hearing of sending Ms. Bramuchi to prison.

CONCLUSION:

The jailing of Ms. Bramuchi on highly questionable charges without bond or regard for her 14^th Amendment protections is now forcing her to give up her attractively furnished townhome and it leaves her with no access to her meticulously detailed case records.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).