Imagine that. The extent of the Sanders "threat" is to prolong the campaign.
The only thing they can extract from that victory to feed the intelligentsia who read the Times is that his victory is a temporary, minor inconvenience on the way to Hillary's "let them eat cake-walk" to the nomination. Why don't they just confess that voters themselves are minor inconveniences, a necessary evil in a "democracy"?
Bernie's victory in Michigan is perhaps his most important one yet. It's a shift of momentum and it's about a key blue state. With the unions and the well-established Democratic Party infrastructure, they could have gone for Hillary. A short while ago, Hillary was ahead by 25 points.
And while there may have been some Harry Reid hanky-panky in Nevada, and some truly disturbing interference in Massachusetts (See click here and click here) it is going to take more than lying and cheating to stop the Sanders express.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).