316 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 57 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 11/2/14

Gerrymandering & Voter Suppression: How the Supreme Court may have rigged the electoral system

By       (Page 3 of 5 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   2 comments

Danny Weil
Message Danny Weil
Become a Fan
  (4 fans)

(http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/political_commentary/commentary_by_tim_storey/gop_makes_historic_state_legislative_gains_in_2010).

The significance of the Republican take-over of a majority of state legislatures in 2010 was that 2010 was a census year, and following the census Congressional districts were redrawn by state legislatures, with Republican controlled legislatures gerrymandering enough districts to provide them with an almost certain majority in the US House of Representatives until 2020, when the next redrawing of Congressional districts occur.

In North Carolina, after spending over $ 2 million to win Republican control of the legislature, right wing millionaire Art Pope served as pro bono legal counsel for the redrawing of North Carolina's electoral districts (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_Pope).

All of this should raise questions about whether the Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United decision was deliberately timed to give the Republicans the ability to gerrymander Congressional districts following the census, and establish a "permanent" majority in the House of Representatives. It certainly seems that way.

Voter Suppression


Copyrighted Image? DMCA

In 2013, the Supreme Court overturned a key part of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, paving the way for Texas and other states to enact voter ID laws. As the Washington Post reported:

"A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday invalidated a crucial component of the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965, ruling that Congress has not taken into account the nation's racial progress when singling out certain states for federal oversight.

Proponents of the law, which protects minority voting rights, called the ruling a death knell.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Danny Weil Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I am an author and investigative journalist who has written more than four hundred articles for Truthout, Counterpunch, Dissident Voice, Daily Censored, Project Censored and more. I received two awards from Project Censored, one in 2010 and one (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Can America stomach another Bush in the Whitehouse?

The fix is in for the Darren Wilson grand jury

The Social and Psychological Roots of Machiavellian Thinking and Sophistic Thought

Hedge Funds cannibalize public-teacher pension funds

A Generation of Idiots and the Tools We Worship

A Dickensian nightmare: New York City and the Great Economic Divide

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend