Windhoek, Namibia, "Basic Income Grant: A remedy for poverty and inequality in Namibia?" 24 September 2013: http://binews.org/2013/09/windhoek-namibia-%E2%80%9Cbasic-income-grant-a-remedy-for-poverty-and-inequality-in-namibia%E2%80%9D-24-september-2013/
WINDHOEK, Namibia, "Social safety nets in Namibia: Assessing current programmes and future options," September 26, 2013: http://binews.org/2013/08/windhoek-namibia-%e2%80%9csocial-safety-nets-in-namibia-assessing-current-programmes-and-future-options%e2%80%9d-september-26-2013/
Elvis Muraranganda, "US academic wants Namibia to go BIG:" http://binews.org/2013/10/elvis-muraranganda-"us-academic-wants-namibia-to-go-big"
Elvis Muraranganda, "US academic wants Namibia to go BIG"
This article reports on Karl Widerquist's lecture on BIG at the Bank of Namibia conference and on Social Safety Nets on September 26, 2013. The article also reports on the debate over BIG in Namibia.
Elvis Muraranganda, "US academic wants Namibia to go BIG," The Namibian Sun, Wednesday September 25, 2013: http://sun.com.na/government/us-academic-wants-namibia-go-big.57674
Tina Rosenberg, "The Benefits of Cash Without Conditions"
[Timothy Roscoe Carter]
In a recent op-ed piece in the
New York Times, Rosenberg summarizes recent results from the
GiveDirectly campaign in Kenya and a couple of other unconditional
cash transfer programs in Uganda and contrasts them with
conditional transfer programs in Mexico and Brazil.
Tina Rosenberg won a Pulitzer Prize for her book "The Haunted
Land: Facing Europe's Ghosts After Communism." She is a former
editorial writer for The
Times.
Tina Rosenberg, "The Benefits of Cash Without Conditions", New
York Times Opinion pages, August
28,
2013 .
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/28/the-benefits-of-cash-without-conditions/?_r=0)
Olga Khazan, "The Case for Unconditional Handouts to the Poor"
(Craig Axford)
In this article in The Atlantic, Olga Khazan
points to recent research coming out of Morocco that demonstrates
unconditional handouts to those in need leads to better outcomes
than conditional handouts. Many fail to enrol in conditional
programs at all, fearing they may not be able to meet the
requirements, while those receiving unconditional support have no
such concerns. Unconditional programs also come with fewer
administrative burdens saving both time and resources.
Olga Khazan, "The case for Unconditional Handouts to the Poor: No, they don't blow it on booze or drugs -- at least not in developing countries." The Atlantic, Aug 16, 2013. www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/08/the-case-for-giving-poor-people-handouts-with-no-strings-attached/278770/
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).