Lincoln's actions in suppressing the rights of the "enemy" southerners reflected the attitudes of the more radical of his supporters who regarded the ascension of their Republican party in the southern statehouses as an inevitable political destiny of the war. And so it is, in all military campaigns, that in the pursuit of our ‘enemies,’ we become so convinced of the rightness of our cause that we detach ourselves from the consequences of the dehumanization of our opponents. When opposing powers war, how do we distinguish between lawful opposition and insurrection?
The quote Musharraf so blithely adopted was Lincoln addressing the question of the suspension of the privilege of the writ in a July 4, 1861 message to a wary Congress; clearly torn between defending against subversives who advocated secession, and the application of the absolute power of his executive Presidency. Lincoln felt that the preservation of the confederation took precedence over all else; noting that the Constitution was conceived, not only to secure liberty, but to secure the "formation of a more perfect Union"
However, a year after the war ended, the Supreme Court would rule that Lincoln had exceeded his authority. And despite Congress' acquiescence in its subsequent approval of Lincoln's arbitrary actions in its passing of the Habeas Corpus bill of 1863, the court found that the president was not protected by the constitution in his suspension of the citizen's rights, even in wartime.
That opinion has not dissuaded American presidents in the centuries thereafter from using the power of government to mandate loyalty, stifle opposition and imprison those they considered enemies of the state. In wartime, or in an 'emergency,' a weak franchise may wrongfully view opposition as treason and seek to crush it. But in the absence of the full consent of the governed, such a heavy hand by an omnipresent government is nothing less than tyranny.
Unlike the anti-democratic rulers in the U.S. today, and in Pakistan, Lincoln believed that adherence to the principles of democracy would distinguish any victory in a manner that would provide for the durability of the Union and foster a national affirmation of the rights of the individual. "It was that," he said, "which gave promise that in due time the weight would be lifted from the shoulders of all men."
Unfortunately, in Bush and Musharraf's self-serving definition of the democracy Lincoln so eloquently defended, the preservation of their own power is paramount to whatever instigation of democracy they claim to defend.
The quote Musharraf so blithely adopted was Lincoln addressing the question of the suspension of the privilege of the writ in a July 4, 1861 message to a wary Congress; clearly torn between defending against subversives who advocated secession, and the application of the absolute power of his executive Presidency. Lincoln felt that the preservation of the confederation took precedence over all else; noting that the Constitution was conceived, not only to secure liberty, but to secure the "formation of a more perfect Union"
However, a year after the war ended, the Supreme Court would rule that Lincoln had exceeded his authority. And despite Congress' acquiescence in its subsequent approval of Lincoln's arbitrary actions in its passing of the Habeas Corpus bill of 1863, the court found that the president was not protected by the constitution in his suspension of the citizen's rights, even in wartime.
That opinion has not dissuaded American presidents in the centuries thereafter from using the power of government to mandate loyalty, stifle opposition and imprison those they considered enemies of the state. In wartime, or in an 'emergency,' a weak franchise may wrongfully view opposition as treason and seek to crush it. But in the absence of the full consent of the governed, such a heavy hand by an omnipresent government is nothing less than tyranny.
Unlike the anti-democratic rulers in the U.S. today, and in Pakistan, Lincoln believed that adherence to the principles of democracy would distinguish any victory in a manner that would provide for the durability of the Union and foster a national affirmation of the rights of the individual. "It was that," he said, "which gave promise that in due time the weight would be lifted from the shoulders of all men."
Unfortunately, in Bush and Musharraf's self-serving definition of the democracy Lincoln so eloquently defended, the preservation of their own power is paramount to whatever instigation of democracy they claim to defend.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
