398 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 55 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Is it Time to Give Up?

By       (Page 2 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   15 comments

Michael Bonanno
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michael Bonanno
Become a Fan
  (7 fans)
The show was a debate between the two sides.  The trouble with that is we’re already there!  We’ve been there for a long time.  Not much was covered that hasn’t already been covered and debated.  Showing it on The History Channel didn’t solve anything.  It just served to make people on either side angrier.   

However, in defense of The History Channel, at least it showed the alternative arguments. 

What made me angry was, if one thought that those holding alternate theories were wrong, the show merely reinforced their opinion. 

One procedure that was used is as follows: 

(Written on the TV screen) “Conspiracy Theorists: The hole in the pentagon wall did not match up with a hole that would have been made by a Boeing 757.” 

THC would then have “conspiracy theorists” like Griffin, Meyson, Tarpley, the makers of “Loose Change” or other “conspiracy theorists” explain their position.  Once they explained their position, the next thing on the screen was: 

“Expert Response”
 

And they’d have the “experts” explain the other side of the argument. 

Need they go any further? 

“Conspiracy theorists?

“Expert Response”?  

There were other skewed activities, but I’ll point out just one more. 

When the “conspiracy theorists” gave their responses, they didn’t personally attack people who defended the government’s position. 

However, many times when the “experts” responded, they used descriptors. 

A couple of examples (paraphrased): 

“You see, conspiracy theorists love a vacuum” or “conspiracy theories are sexy” or “conspiracy theorists tend to leave out important facts”.  They didn’t respond to all of the issues using these descriptors, but they used them far too often.  This further reinforced the conclusion of many who were watching that, yes, conspiracy theorists are not only not experts, but also make stuff up to manipulate the facts. 

Let’s review. 

Did FDR allow Pearl Harbor to happen?  If he did, he purposely allowed Americans to die at the hands of the Japanese. 

FDR died in office in 1945 of what appeared to be a stroke. 

Lyndon Johnson has been implicated in everything from being the catalyst for the deaths of 58,000 American military personnel to the murder of President John F. Kennedy. 

Johnson could not be elected to a second full term because of his sinking popularity.  He retired to his Texas home where he died of a heart attack at the age of 64. 

I’m pretty unfamiliar with what many say really happened in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995, but I do know that 163 innocent people died because of a premeditated action. 

Timothy McVeigh was put to death for what happened in Oklahoma City, but many believe that Bill Clinton and Janet Reno were involved. 

Bill Clinton completed two full terms as president and has retired.  His wife was elected to the US Senate and is now a leading candidate for president. 

As far as I know, Janet Reno is not in prison. 

FDR, as leader of the United States government, basically murdered people at Pearl Harbor if he knew it was going to happen and didn’t stop it. 

Johnson murdered millions of people via The Vietnam War, including 58,000 American soldiers and was complicit in the assassination of an American president, if what is believed by some is true. 

Clinton, Reno and others were complicit in killing 163 Americans. 

If these people did what they’re accused of doing, the conspiracy theorists have wasted lots of time.  Roosevelt and Johnson can no longer be punished for mass murder. 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Bonanno Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Michael Bonanno is an associate editor for OpEdNews.

He is also a published poet, essayist and musician who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Bonanno is a political progressive, not a Democratic Party apologist. He believes it's (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Teabaggers; Children of the Sixties?

It's OK to say "Merry Christmas"

Is The Constitution Really That Unfair?

Will "Americans Elect" Their President in 2012?

Why Anarchism, Communism and Libertarianism are Pipe Dreams

LA Socialist Party Local Holds Organizing Meeting (Discussion with Mimi Soltysik, Local Chair)

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend