Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
The following is the count as I have conveyed it to five Federal Judges in the state of Connecticut:
"...,it is my duty to inform you..., of two counts of treason perpetrated by individuals high in the U.S. government. Such acts were done with premeditation.
The original crimes took place in New York, Virginia, and Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001; the attacks on the World Trade Center, Pentagon, the downing of a civilian airplane respectively. There is no need to name the victims individually; there were close of 3,000 deaths not to mention the other loses. The crimes I am reporting relate to how the U.S. government dealt with the criminal responsible for the original crime.
The criminal believed to be behind the crime, even though not indicted for those specific crimes by the Federal Government, is Osama Bin Laden and his Al-Qaeda organization.
In response to the 9/11 attacks, the Federal government launched military actions against Afghanistan since its rulers, the Taleban, harbored the alleged criminal. The Taleban, by harboring Bin Laden, were determined to have aided and abetted the alleged criminal.
During those military actions in Afghanistan, more Americans and innocent Afghanis lost their lives; they could also be considered victims of the crimes I am reporting.
The crime from a Federal perspective is perfectly defined by U.S. Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 115, § 2381. Treason
After close to a year of research, I can say with a high degree of accuracy that the Bush administration was the closest to apprehending Bin Laden on or around September 26, 2001, two weeks after 9/11 and ten days prior to military actions against Afghanistan and deliberately chose not to capture him.
On September 21, 2001, the Bush administration launched a sting operation, with the help of Saudi intelligence, which was originally designed to capture Bin Laden; after 9/11 the sting operation evolved into two parts.
The first part was to tape him confessing to his guilt.
The second part was to capture him.
The first part was successfully executed on September 26, 2001. The result was the grainy videotape of Bin Laden confessing at a dinner meeting to Khaled Al-Harbi and providing proof of detailed prior knowledge. My work is the closest to an authentication of that tape put forth in the public domain and the only authentication work known to exist.
Of the September 26, 2001 meeting, when the taping took place, the Bush administration had 4 days advance knowledge of the date of the meeting, 24 hours advance knowledge of the exact location of the meeting, and knew that Bin Laden would be in that village where the meeting took place for at least 3 hours if not overnight since Bin Laden's family also lived in that village.
Intelligence operatives were in the same room as Bin Laden for 3 hours on September 26, 2001 and chose only to tape him. The obvious explanation is, if they had captured him or killed him, the Bush administration could not have launched military actions against Afghanistan ten days later.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
