What alternative has he had?
Leahy has had the means, during these quiet intervals, to raise the hue and cry. Just because the legal or legislative processes take time, that doesn't mean that Leahy has to allow all the momentum behind the dramatizing of Bushite lawlessness to dissipate. Leahy is prominent enough to capture the attention of the media, and he has already flushed out sufficient evidence that he could regularly take center stage to speak prophetically to the country about the assault on the rule of law and the unprecedented presidential usurpations.
The subpoenas ignored, the trip to John Ashcroft’s hospital room, the U.S. Attorney firings. This should be a top story all the time. Much bigger than sexual misconduct with a eager and predatory young intern. Worse Than Watergate, as John Dean said.
But Leahy evidently does not have the fire in the belly to raise such an alarm to the nation. It's as though the house were on fire, and he's content to pour a bit of water on it during working hours but leave it to burn on its own between shifts.
In this, I believe, Leahy reflects the general situation of the Democrats. Their hearts are basically in the right place. But they just don't have enough heart to stand up forcefully to the challenge they face.
A MATTER OF SPIRIT
There are different opinions regarding why the Democrats have not stood up better to the Bushites. Some believe them to be actually on the Bushites' side, and only pretending to oppose them. This I simply do not buy. Some believe them to be afraid of alienating the big money interests. Perhaps there's some truth to this, but I don't believe that even in the realm of Big Money there's all that much support for Bushite fascism. Some, including me, believe the Democrats are afraid of losing politically if they confront the Bushite evil more energetically. There's room for that explanation, but I do not believe it goes deep enough.
Ultimately, I suggest, it is at the deeper, spiritual level that the battle against the Bushite forces and for the destiny and soul of America is ultimately being conducted. (In human affairs, generally, it is from the spiritual level --for good or for evil-- that the real power comes.)
These Democrats could deal with the usual straight, superficial politics. But they shown --again and again--cannot deal with evil. For evil, though dark, is plugged into a source of power. The Democrats are plugged into nothing so fundamental. And this is why --from Gore in 2000 to Kerry in 2004 to the Congress here in 2007-- the Democrats have shown themselves so clueless, weak, cowardly, and ineffectual.
You can't beat something with nothing. And in the realm of the spirit, evil is something.
Hitler tapped into great power. But his opponents in the West --Roosevelt and Churchill-- were themselves both connected beneath the mundane, prosaic level, and they had the energetic resources to lead their peoples against the dark powers confronting them.
But today's Democratic Party --and much of today's liberal America-- is cut off from such spiritual juice. (I have written before about this spiritual deficiency at the heart of American liberalism: see "A Spiritual Void in Contemporary Liberalism Helped Open the Door to a Spiritual Con Job from the Right," at
So the Bushites, who are made powerful by their being so fully the expression of this ruthless spirit whose lust for power and destruction propels them into ceaseless usurpations and bullying and deception –these Bushites who are, unlike the Democrats, truly plugged into the spiritual realm, though it is the realm of evil spirits—manage to steamroller them in confrontation after confrontation. The Democrats fall back into a position of weakness every time—not because they do not have the MEANS to be strong, but because they do not have the strength and courage to wield their potential strength.
Again, their battle against the Bushites at this point is not a matter of who wins the battles at the level of pure power. For the most part, the realities of political power would not enable the Democrats to prevail simply through the correlation of forces. But the Democrats could win, in a meaningful sense, even in the course of such political defeat.
A creative spirit, inspired and fueled from the realm of the spirit, could surf along the forces of goodness in ways that dramatize to the American people just what this struggle is about: Good against evil. American vs. un-American. Honest vs. lying. Compassionate vs. indifferent or even sadistic. Peace-loving vs. war-loving.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).