455 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 24 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
General News   

Comments on LWV Resolution on Voting Systems

By Kathy Dopp, National Election Data Archive  Posted by Joan Brunwasser (about the submitter)       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments
Author 79
Senior Editor

Joan Brunwasser
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Joan Brunwasser
I am thrilled to see the US League of Women Voters adopted this resolution that, if adopted, would ensure that U.S. vote counts are accurate!

This resolution puts the US League of Women Voters in the very forefront of the effort to fix American democracy because, unlike some other prominent nation-wide "election integrity" groups, the US League of Women Voters recognizes that:

1. voter-verified paper ballots are insufficient in themselves unless some of them are hand-counted in audits that check the machine counts, and

2. the paper ballot should be the official record (not the electronic ballot).

I hope that other election integrity groups such as VerifiedVoting and CommonCause which have endorsed voter-verifiable paper ballots (VVPBs) but neglected to sufficiently point out that VVPBs, without being counted in independent audits, are no more than a false assurance to voters and leave the risk for malfeasance and error high, will now follow the example of the US League of Women Voters.

Without independent audits, any voting system is wide-open to error and tampering.

A hearty "Thank You" to the delegates who took the time to attend the US League of Women Voters Summer Conference in Minneapolis and vote in favor of this patriotic resolution. Thank you for fighting to preserve our democracy and our freedom and way of life.

The vast majority of US voting systems are in much worse shape today than they were in 2000 or 2004 because the reach of any one technical person to undetectably e-rig elections extends to more locales than ever before in U.S. history. (For instance one Diebold technician could conceivably undetectably rig elections in 37 states. Yet the vast majority of states which use Diebolds, like Utah, have taken no meaningful actions which would prevent, detect, or correct such malfeasance. And Diebold is probably not the only voting system with such flaws.)

The National Election Data Archive has a do-able plan to detect vote miscounts,despite such flawed voting systems, by analyzing detailed vote count data that we have a legal right to obtain in most states, but which election officials do not routinely publicly release in any state.

Without analyzing detailed vote count data prior to candidates' conceding, insiders could undetectably pad votes for one candidate in one vote-type and subtract votes for a different candidate in another vote type, or tamper with one vote-type. Evidence of these problems appeared in both states where we were able to obtain the detailed data after the 2004 election -- New Mexico and Washington state.

Please help NEDA to complete the system so that we can actively monitor election results in all states. Donate to US Count Votes' National Election Data Archive (NEDA) Project.

We need $2000/month to pay NEDA's new programmer to complete the functionality and backup system for obtaining detailed vote count data and making it publicly available from the over 3300 separate county election offices in America.

Please see http://electionarchive.org to donate or find out how candidates, voters, and political parties can ensure that the correct candidates are sworn into office.

Please see http://electionarchive.net if you would like to sign up to help obtain the data for your own county or state.
--
----
Kathy Dopp
435-658-4657
http://electionarchive.org
National Election Data Archive
Dedicated to Accurately Counting Elections
Subscribe to announcements by emailing election-subscribe@uscountvotes.org

"Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day," wrote Thomas Jefferson in 1816

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Joan Brunwasser Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out PayUpNow.org!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend