425 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 77 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 7/25/22

What Will You Do When the GOP Comes For Your Wife, Daughter, or Sister?

By       (Page 2 of 6 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   4 comments

Thom Hartmann
Message Thom Hartmann
Become a Fan
  (139 fans)

Women's suffrage leaders Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton argued strongly against the amendment as written. Stanton wrote in 1866:

"If the word 'male' be inserted [in this amendment] it will take a century to get it out again."

Stanton was off in her prediction by only two years: it wasn't until the Democratic Kennedy/Johnson administrations that the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 required equal pay for women and prohibited workplace discrimination against women by any company with more than twenty-four employees.

The Biden administration proposed updating the expiring Equal Pay Act of 1963 with the Paycheck Fairness Act of 2021, which passed the House on a 217-210 vote but is now blocked by a Republican filibuster in the Senate.

In the House vote, only one Republican voted "Yes"; every other Republican in the House voted "No" to reauthorizing and expanding equal economic rights for women, with the GOP providing all 210 of those "No" votes.

Men controlling and regulating women to maintain male supremacy in this country has a long history.

As I noted in Unequal Protection: How Corporations Became Persons, the Supreme Court gave corporations powers of personhood and access to the Bill of Rights a full forty years before women gained the right to vote, and 90 years before women could sign a contract without a man's co-signature.

For the first century or so of our republic:

  • *A married woman was not allowed to make out a will; she was not allowed to own land or legally control anything else worthy of willing to another person.

  • *Any property she brought into the marriage became her husband's at the moment of marriage, and would only revert to her if he died and she did not remarry.

  • *But even then, she'd only get one-third of her husband's property, and what third that was and how she could use it were determined by a court-appointed male executor, who would supervise for the rest of her life (or until she remarried) how she used the third of her husband's estate she "inherited."

  • *When a widow died, the executor would either take the property for himself or else decide to whom it would pass: the woman had no say in the matter, because she had no right to sign a will.

  • *Women could not sue in a court of law, except by the weak procedures allowed to the mentally ill and children, supervised by men.

  • *If the man of a family household died, the executor would decide who would raise the wife's children, and in what religion: she had no right to make those decisions and no say in such matters.

  • *If the woman was poor, it was a virtual certainty that her children would be taken from her.

  • *It was impossible in the new United States of America for a married woman to have legal responsibility for her children, control of her own property, buy or sell land, or even obtain an ordinary license.

    Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

    (Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Thom Hartmann Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Thom Hartmann is a Project Censored Award-winning New York Times best-selling author, and host of a nationally syndicated daily progressive talk program on the Air America Radio Network, live noon-3 PM ET. www.thomhartmann.com His most recent books are "The Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight," "Unequal Protection: The Rise of Corporate Dominance and the Theft of Human Rights," "We The People," "What Would Jefferson Do?," "Screwed: The Undeclared War Against the Middle (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

S&P Blames Republicans, Mainstream Media Fails to Report It

Globalization Is Killing The Globe: Return to Local Economies

The Uncanny, Frightening Ways That Trump's America Mirrors Hitler's Germany

The Great Tax Con Job

The Truth about the Trust Fund-- Destroying Social Security to Destroy the Two Party System

The Deciding Moment: The Theft of Human Right

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend