Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 14 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Thomas Sankara: An Icon of Revolution

By       (Page 2 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   1 comment
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 516005
Message Yanis Iqbal
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

While Sankara's speech elicited an enthusiastic response from the people, the speech of President Jean-Baptiste Oue'draogo - who belonged to the conservative faction - was lackluster and failed to electrify the crowd. As is evident from this, the gulf between the revolutionary and conservative factions was widening.

On 17 May, 1983, military units detained Sankara and Commander Lingani and took up strategic positions around the capital. These were the intimations of a new coup against Sankara's radical faction. President Oue'draogo announced that the CSP had decided to "remove from its ranks all those who were working to turn it from its initial path through behavior, declarations, and acts that were as demagogic as they were irresponsible." He was implicitly accusing Sankara and Lingani of breaking the stranglehold of the conservative faction and advancing an alternative, revolutionary policy paradigm.

In order to reconstitute a conservative administration, President Oue'draogo named Colonel Some' Yorian, one of the primary authors of the coup, as the secretary general of national defense and purged the cabinet of all those individuals who were politically associated with Sankara. The new administration came to be widely known as the CSP-II. This counter-offensive against Sankara had the involvement of the French imperialists. On 16 May - just a day before the coup - Guy Penne, the adviser on African affairs to French President François Mitterrand, had arrived in Ouagadougou and left the next afternoon, while the coup was under way, and after agreeing to provide the new government with more financial aid.

The decision to oust Sankara did not go as planned. Over 20"21 May, popular demonstrations were organized throughout Ouagadougou, involving students, radicalized poor people and trade unionists. Protest cries of "Free Sankara!" roared all over the streets and anti-imperialist slogans, particularly against France, reverberated throughout the city. Clandestine committees of civilians were formed and revolutionary supporters of Sankara underwent military training in the garrison in Pô where the troops of Sankara's old commando training base had refused to recognize the authorities in Ouagadougou. It was here that Captain Blaise Compaore', a captain and co-revolutionary, had fled in order to evade arrest.

On 4 August, 1983, 250 commandos from Pô left the garrison for the capital with aim of overthrowing the CSP-II. With the help of the clandestine civilian groups, the city's power was cut and at 9:30 pm, the commandos captured all their targets. In the meantime, junior officers took over the air base and the artillery camp. By 10 pm, Sankara proclaimed the overthrow of the government on the radio. In his address to the nation on the evening of 4 August, Sankara announced the formation of the National Council of the Revolution (CNR) and urged supporters to immediately form Committees for the Defense of the Revolution (CDRs) "everywhere, in order to fully participate in the CNR's great patriotic struggle and to prevent our enemies here and abroad from doing our people harm." The new government's main goal, he said, was to work in conjunction with the people and help them achieve their "profound aspirations for liberty, true independence, and economic and social progress."

Building a Socialist Economy

The CNR was resolutely opposed to the various forms of subjugation existing in the country and its critique of the established system was sweeping. The general outlook of the CNR administration was defined by Sankara in his important Political Orientation speech - given on 2 October, 1983 - where he used Marxist and dependency theory to construct the theoretical foundations of the August revolution. In the speech, he stated: "The fear that the struggle of the popular masses would lead to truly revolutionary solutions had been the basis for the choice made by imperialism: From that point on, it would maintain stranglehold over our country and perpetuate the exploitation of our people through the use of Voltaic intermediaries". Terming this as "neo-colonialism", Sankara said that the "primary goal of the revolution is to transfer power from the hands of the Voltaic bourgeoisie allied with imperialism to the hands of the alliance of popular classes that constitute the people." Sakara's incisive condemnation of imperialism was accompanied by the use of moral lexicon which interwove a militant revolutionary attitude with the soft glow of emotions. Integrity, for example, was highly emphasized by the CNR and on the first anniversary of the 4 August revolution the council renamed the country "Burkina Faso": land of the upright people.

Sankara's government promoted the construction of an independent, self-sufficient, and planned national economy. Sankara's model of self-reliance meant that the national economy would operate based on domestic interests. The needs of peasants and rural communities would take precedence over exports that served international interests. The government would depart from a tone-deaf approach in allocating resources and focus instead on the needs of people and institutions at the local level. In order to achieve this goal, the government relied on social mobilization and community self-help projects to promote development. These new initiatives produced noticeable changes in the public health sector. By 1986, the government built 7,460 primary health posts (almost one per village) throughout the country; public health spending increased by 27% between 1983 and 1987; and 2.5 million children received vaccinations. Under Sankara, Burkina Faso also became the first country to acknowledge the HIV/AIDS epidemic.

A self-reliant economic framework - which prioritized social development over profit maximization - translated into staunch anti-neoliberalism. Sankara refused to accept the Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs) that the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) were imposing on third world nations throughout the 1980s. He abhorred the idea of passively receiving loans from imperialist institutions. In a speech given in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, at the twenty-fifth conference of member states of the Organisation of African Unity (OAU), he had powerfully declared: "The debt is another form of neo-colonialism, one in which the colonialists have transformed themselves into technical assistants. Actually, it would be more accurate to say technical assassins" The debt in its present form is a cleverly organised re-conquest of Africa under which our growth and development are regulated by stages and norms totally alien to us."

In order to avoid a large budget deficit, Sankara proposed a model of modest living. To this end, the CNR transformed the civil service and erased any sign of ostentatious living. The revolutionary government froze civil service salaries; reduced housing allowances by 25"50%; and made it obligatory for public employees to contribute to a variety of special funds and levies to aid drought victims or finance development projects. Two-thirds of the government's auto fleet was sold off, and only small cars were kept. Sankara himself used a small, low-priced Peugeot 205.

Imperialist Assassination

On 15 October, 1987, Sankara was attending a meeting with his small team of advisors at the Conseil de l'Entente headquarters. 15 minutes into the meeting, shooting erupted in the small courtyard outside, in which the president's driver and two bodyguards were killed. Upon hearing the gunfire, everyone inside took cover. Sankara got up and told his aides, "It's me they want." He left the room to face the assailants. He was shot numerous times, and died on the spot. The gunmen then entered the meeting room and killed everyone but Alouna Traore', who survived and fled the country.

Sankara's assassination was a result of a complex convergence of interests. Firstly, Blaise Compaore' had personal interests in overthrowing Sankara and concentrating power in his own hands. Compaore' had married to Chantale Terrasson de Fougères, the adopted daughter of Côte d'Ivoire's President Houphouët- Boigny. While Compaore' and Fougères wanted to live an ostentatious life, Sankara's radical project of modest living - aimed at helping the poor and establishing a socialistic culture of humanism - constantly acted as a hurdle in their pursuit of personal ambitions.

Secondly, geo-political actors like France and USA were interested in killing Sankara and re-incorporating Burkina Faso into the structural arrangement of imperialist subordination and global capitalism. The imperialist interests of major powers neatly coincided with the personal interests of Compaore'. Thus, Compaore' functioned as an imperial-backed domestic actor who could simultaneously enrich himself and advance the objectives of neoliberalism by murdering Sankara.

For France and USA, Sankara's revolutionary policies constituted a tangible threat to imperialism. When French president Francois Mitterrand had arrived in Ouagadougou in November 1986, he had directly experienced the threat posed by Sankara's revolutionary politics to the project of unfettered neo-colonialism. During Mitterrand's visit, Sankara disrupted the normal diplomatic discourse and presented the French president with a forceful anti-imperialist dialogue. He talked about colonial policies in Palestine; defended Nicaragua against USA' hybrid warfare; and criticized Paris for its policies in the African continent and towards African immigrants in France. At the end, Mitterrand said, "I admire his great qualities, but he is too forthright; in my opinion he goes too far." He also added, "This is a somewhat troublesome man, President Sankara". A year after these remarks, Sankara was assassinated. Many believe that Jacques Foccart, a key French intelligence figure with extensive networks throughout Africa, had actively engaged in the assassination plans.

USA, too, had concerns about Sankara's revolutionary project. Sankara had converted Upper Volta - a formal colony till 1919 and a neo-colony till 1960 - into Burkina Faso - the land of revolutionaries who challenged imperialism. This was bound to be troublesome for the US which was building an informal empire and wanted a friction-free Global South, subservient to America. Herman Jay Cohen - former Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs - had written that, as a member of the American Executive, "I accused Sankara of trying to destabilize the entire region of West Africa"I insisted that Sankara was hurting the image of the entire French community in West Arica". From this, it is evident that the US was interested in containing Sankara's revolutionary project and coordinating its hegemony with France's sub-imperial dominance in Africa. To do this, USA used the services of Liberian mercenaries who helped assassinate Sankara. Charles Taylor, for instance, was a Liberian who was released from an American jail with the help of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and then asked to infiltrate African revolutionary movements. It was later found that Taylor had been involved in the assassination of Sankara. It is important to remember that the Liberian mercenaries were not solely financed by the US. There was another agreement that Compaore' and Muammar al-Qaddafi of Libya would help Charles Taylor and his men seize power in Liberia in return for the assassination of Sankara. Qaddafi chose to fund the murder of Sankara since the relations between the two had become strained over the latter's efforts to mediate among different warring factions in Chad (a war in which Libya had intervened).

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Rate It | View Ratings

Yanis Iqbal Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Yanis Iqbal is a student and freelance writer based in Aligarh, India and is interested in studying the existential conditions of subaltern classes.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Neoliberalism and the Politics of Violence in Colombia

The Crisis of Coffee Capitalism in Colombia

The Crisis of Neoliberalism in Honduras

Financialization of Copper Mining in Chile

The Ravages of Lithium Extraction in Chile

Covid-19 and the Health Crisis in Latin America

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: