I am quite well aware this concept of government will meet with much opposition. So I ask, what are the alternatives? The problem becomes that there is only one actual alternative, which can take many forms. Any other concept of government is simply based upon the premise that à ‚¬Ëœmight makes right.' Many forms of government are based blatantly upon this concept. A dictatorship is the most obvious that comes to mind but others do as well, such as a military junta, absolute monarchy, theocracy, or any number of others. These forms of government are obviously composed of just a few members of society dictating to the rest. They have the à ‚¬Ëœmight' and whatever they say is à ‚¬Ëœright.'
However, there are other forms of government that can work from this same principle while remaining unnoticed. Even our own form of a Constitutional Republic may work in this manner and often does. The reason is that any time any government takes any action which cannot be justified by the concept of human rights contained herein, that action is either an usurpation of power and authority or a manufacture of power and authority by force. The government cannot usurp power and authority from the people without an unjust use of force nor can the government simply manufacture power and authority without an unjust use of force. Thus, à ‚¬Ëœmight makes right' defines such action and the form the government may take is irrelevant. An unjust use of force, no matter how many citizens support such action, is simply à ‚¬Ëœmight makes right' and nothing more.
In an example, the poor need help and it is not always easy to get help from family, neighbors and other local citizens and organizations for a variety of reasons. Private charities are often overwhelmed with requests so we have a government that has taken over a large portion of what used to be handled with private charity. Can government tax citizens and justly use this money to make payments to the poor for their upkeep? In answering this question, the first thing one must remember is that government is force. Whatever government undertakes, the threat of force is overtly made or implied. That in itself is not a bad thing for there is just and unjust use of force. The real question then, is from whence this force comes. For the use of force to be just it must be derived from individual human rights on loan to the government. Put in individual terms, can person A justly force person B to give charitably to person C? The only rational answer is no. One does not have the right or the moral authority to force another to give to charity no matter what the cause. Since this is obviously so, one cannot then loan the power they do not possess to the government. In order for the government to accomplish this end, government must manufacture the authority by force to do this. The governmental manufacture of force is unjust for any reason no matter how noble the cause. Government simply cannot undertake a just act by using unjust force and to do so amounts to nothing more than à ‚¬Ëœmight makes right.'
In still another example, we have many calls today for democracy. Some believe the President should be elected by the popular vote and that the Electoral College should be disbanded. Others call for combining the two chambers of Congress into a unicameral legislature to facilitate legislation. Yet what do both of these propositions have in common? They both do away with protections of minority rights and institute à ‚¬Ëœmight makes right' into our very government. The majority wants what they want and they want it now. They are generally more than willing to ride roughshod over the wishes of the minority, if not outright ignore them, and do whatever they feel they have a à ‚¬Ëœmandate' to accomplish. Pure democracy was recognized by our Founding Fathers as degenerating into nothing but mob rule and tyranny.
While might certainly does not make right, government can justly wield force. One of the more obvious examples is an attack from some outside force against the nation. The government is perfectly justified to use force against any invaders who seek to subjugate the people. The individual has the right of self-defense and can justly loan this right, this power, to the government to exercise in the individual's stead.
Conclusion
Human rights are those essential qualities intrinsic to the individual by virtue of existence, which are possessed and exercised independently of others. On this and this alone may a just government be based. It has been shown over several examples and explanations just how our concept of human rights must determine our concept of human government. It is only through a thorough examination and a proper understanding of human rights in general and in specific which can then lead to a proper understanding of the role of a just government. It is only through this understanding of human rights and the proper role of government that government may be properly restrained and prevented from violating the human rights of the citizen and thereby usurping the citizen's just freedoms and liberties. It is only through this understanding of human rights, in all due diligence, that government may properly employ the power temporarily entrusted to it. Any other course is tyranny.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).