363 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 213 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
General News   

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

By       (Page 2 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   2 comments

William Boardman
Message William Boardman
Become a Fan
  (34 fans)

"These buildings are supposed to be seismically and structurally secure and, you know, if the ground sinks under them, that suddenly changes a lot of people's perception," Gunderson said, underscoring the assurances of the nuclear industry that reactors are constructed to survive earthquakes intact.   The Japanese "seismic calculations were wrong all along," he added. 

 

Unit 4 was first damaged by the earthquake/tsunami event, and then suffered several explosions during the aftermath.  Tokyo Electric (TEPCO) acknowledged that the building was damaged and went in during the spring of 2011 to structurally reinforce the elevated fuel pool, to keep the bottom of the pool from breaking and dumping fuel rods uncontrollably. 

 

Today the Unit 4 building is buckled, and is two inches wider at the bottom than at the top.   There is at least one crack in its foundation.

 

Of the four Fukushima reactors and fuel pools, Unit 4 has the most nuclear fuel in the fuel pool, and no fuel in its reactor within the containment.  All the fuel in Unit 4 is outside the relative safety of the containment.  And part of that fuel is the entire hot nuclear core that used to be in the reactor.   That's why the fuel pool steams on colder days. 

 

"There is dozens of times more Cesium in the nuclear fuel pool at Unit 4 than was ever released in all the above ground [nuclear bomb] testing that ever occurred, so if that pool were to face structural damage from another earthquake, it would likely devastate Japan," Gunderson said, "It's a sleeping dragon." 

 

He added that until Tepco gets the fuel out of the pool, the world needs to keeps its fingers crossed that there's not another earthquake, because Tepco is moving too slowly and methodically to make the site safe any time soon. 

 

   Perception of Safety Wins Out Over Reality

 

As has been widely reported, Tepco has known since 2002 that the Fukushima site was unsafe.  "I actually think they knew in the eighties," Gunderson commented.   One reason TEPCO didn't do anything was money, and another was public relations. 

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

William Boardman Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Vermonter living in Woodstock: elected to five terms (served 20 years) as side judge (sitting in Superior, Family, and Small Claims Courts); public radio producer, "The Panther Program" -- nationally distributed, three albums (at CD Baby), some (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

Fukushima Spiking All of a Sudden

Fukushima Meltdowns: Global Denial At Work

Vermont Asks: "What the Fukushima"?

Military-Industrial Complex Owns Vermont

Accountability in Vermont?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend