With this in mind, the concept of spreading the risk can easily be applied to health care. As just mentioned, it'd be better to spread risk by including everybody in a given state with its own health care system than having several smaller groups contributing to private insurance. Remember that under the current health care policy in the US, each heath care plan is considered a distinct group. There are probably hundreds of these plans or groups in each of the 49 states, if we exclude Texas, which is apparently about to secede.
I'm sure I had you at 'topless', but if you'd like more proof, check out what the American Medical Association had to say in a January 2008 op-ed titled, interestingly enough, "Spreading the Risk":
One of the greatest challenges in reforming the U.S. health system is how to make health insurance affordable and available for chronic-care patients, and anyone else who has expectedly high medical costs.
The current approach surely isn't working, given how it contributes to the rising number of people without health insurance.
In employer-based insurance, the low-risk patients subsidize high-risk patients; all pay similar premiums rather than being assessed charges based on their likelihood of using health services. That makes care more affordable and accessible for the high-risk patients.
But many low-risk patients, especially young adults and some lower-income workers, have joined the ranks of the uninsured rather than pay the high premiums insurers deem necessary to support all patients. In the individual market, high-risk patients struggle to get any insurance at all. Insurers instead cherry-pick low-risk patients -- or, as recent cases in California have shown, kick some patients off the rolls the moment they are deemed to be high-risk.
The solution to solving both these problems is replacing the current market-regulation approach to high-risk patients.
Instead, risk-based subsidies -- paid out of general tax revenue -- should be used. Such an approach would ensure that high-risk patients get the care they need at an affordable price. At the same time, and equally welcome news, low-risk patients could see their insurance costs drop as their dollars are no longer required as a subsidy.
This approach, as outlined in a Council on Medical Service report approved by the House of Delegates during the AMA's Interim Meeting in November 2007, is consistent with the Association's plan for reducing the number of uninsured.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
