234 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 116 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
General News    H4'ed 6/12/21

Institutions, Philosophy of Gain of Function

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments

Ethan Indigo Smith
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Ethan Indigo Smith
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)

The Gain of Function institutional operation is essentially equivalent to The Divine Rite of Kings of the past, the damned rights of institutions today; from their ability to restrict information to begin with, up to and including their ability to inflict planetary destruction without consequence. Further, for all all extents and purposes the no taxation rate for these Gain of Function institutions/corporations is 0. The right of institutions to take advantage of whole populations via enforcement of law or instituting war. Institutional Gain of Function is oligarchical collectivism; of information restriction in the so called age of information and of resource restriction. Gain of Function experimentation is actually exactly the same format that institutions have developed for generations, as if some leviathan, only now biological instead of mechanical.

Institutions, at a very basic level as well as in an esoteric manner, are an insertion an idea or ideas into the future toward immortality beyond the individuals who create the idea. Institutions are a life extension of a person's or a group of people's ideas. This by itself is not necessarily corrupt whatsoever, it is just that as power tends to corrupt, as illustrated in Lord Acton's Rule, there is likely some level of implicit corruption in those institutions powerful enough to prolong their ideas into life extension institutionalization, for the good or bad or good and bad of groups of individuals. In order to make their institutionalization consistent institutions implement Gain of Function.

If an institution has formatted itself into an oligarchical/pyramidal construct where the mass of individuals are stuck below, under increased pressure, than there is a Gain of Function operation. If an institution sets of fair and square/circular inclusive ideas that do not seek to dominate or separate there may be some life extension format to it and less Gain of Function. Just like individuals might be decent or not, institutions are different as well, some good, some not. Some pertain to life extension of individuals, while others are designed toward Gain of Function for institutions.

In fact, the institutions of which are most problematic and the least trusted among pressurized individuals are typically the ones that have illustrated intense Gain of Function perversions, like an experimental virus run amok, created so as to be able to combat the problems at hand which causes more problems, as the release of a virus that has undergone Gain of Function enhancement would. Gain of Function makes institutional creations more bad more steadily in order to accomplish more good.

The very institutional dogmatic ultimate death philosophy related to the invention and implementation of nuclear weaponry illustrates it all too well; MAD, mutually assured destruction. Perhaps the grandest institutionalization of Gain of Function ever, and forever more, is and will be the implementation of nuclear experimentation in total. Nuclear experimentation has enhanced weaponry to the point that there is no defense against it -Gain of Function. Nuclear experimentation -weaponry and power generative technology- elicits total entropy of all life, liberty and pursuit of happiness on all levels, as does so many institutional constructs including the global burning of petrol fuels. Nuclear experimentation Gain of Function is perhaps the worst and the most lethal Pandora, but similar institutional droppings are constant.

What to do about institutional Gain of Function? We have to declare open information whereupon no institutionalists can implement clandestine Gain of Function processes. If information is open we all, as living breathing beings can decide upon it, rather than those restrained by institutional mechanics.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Ethan Indigo Smith Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linked In Page       Instagram Page

Ethan was raised in Maine, Manhattan, and Mendocino, California. Ethan has traveled the world and has been employed as a Private Detective, a dishwasher, a valet, a snowboard instructor and always a poet. Ethan Indigo Smith (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

1984 And The Allegory of the Cave

Nuclear Experimentation Killed Free Power

Is Graffiti Art? Squaw Valley Audi FIS

The Failed Politics and Faulty Science of Climate Change

The Metaphysics of Monotheism

Swine Flu May Be Renamed; How about Fecal Flu?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend