241 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 155 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Have Another Hit of Fracked Air

By       (Page 2 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments
Author 41216
Editor

j dial
Follow Me on Twitter     Message j dial
Become a Fan
  (33 fans)

NOx and VOCs in the troposphere are bad news.  When blest by solar radiation, the pair begets ozone and smog. 

VOC to the future

We are accustomed to freighting the air we breathe with few sequents, but now the ante is upped.  Apart from abundant NOx emitted from drilling rigs and the trucks that serve them, fracked wells leak between 40 and 60 percent more methane than do conventional natural-gas wells; this has been confirmed by Petron's employer.  After drilling, methane entwined with chemically loaded water from below escapes at the wellhead; escapes continue all along the matrix.  Although the atmosphere holds more carbon dioxide--200 times more than methane--infrared-absorbing methane is the more insidious greenhouse gas. 

The fracking craze is not confined to gas.  Bakken shale beneath North Dakota, Montana, and Saskatchewan harbors oil, a high-quality light crude that gushes fewer carbon-dioxide emissions than the thick stuff from Canadian tar sands or even Venezuela.  Pursuit of this crude is full-throttled.  To the dismay of the drillers, however, their oil is often encumbered by natural gas.  Some of this raw natural gas is being sold to Canada to dilute raw bitumen from Alberta tar sands, but supply is greater than demand.  So, as making full use of such gas requires both pipelines and processing that are nonexistent, it is being burned off--flared.  In 2011, oil producers in North Dakota flared nearly 32 percent--one third--of all gas produced in the state, and the next year they flared more.  This strikes me as ironic. 

Back in the fields where natural gas is feted, how much slips through the cracks?  Initial estimates from Colorado tallied around 4 percent of all produced escaped, but another team measuring methane in Utah's Uinta Basin, where over the past decade fracking has flourished, assay leakage as high as 9 percent.  The methodology for calculating leakage is disputed in a peer-reviewed comment presenting an alternate interpretation of the data that aligns leakage with industry estimates.  But a more recent study using carbon isotopes to distinguish industrial emissions from bovine-generated methane reinforces earlier findings.  These findings are for wellheads only and exclude losses occurring elsewhere in the matrix. 

Erie, a town of 18,000 straddling Weld and Boulder counties, has spikes in methane and butane that exceed by a factor of nine those of the Los Angeles suburb Pasadena and of Dallas, Texas, two cities with the most health-impinging air in the land. 

How critical are the numbers?  One study reports that, as long as the cumulative methane leakage from natural-gas production remains below 3.2%, shifting from coal-fired to natural-gas generators will have immediate climatic benefits and those benefits will accrue over time as gas plants replace coal plants. 

We're well beyond that benchmark. 

***

[1] Jana Milford carries a master of science in engineering and a Ph.D. in engineering and public policy from Carnegie Mellon University and a J.D. from the University of Colorado School of Law.  With a primary technical focus in modeling the chemistry and transport of ozone, secondary organic aerosols, and other photochemical air pollutants, she researches legal, technical, and policy aspects of air pollution. 

[2] Gabrielle Petron is a Research Laboratory Associate Scientist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.  The title of their talk was Atmospheric Perspectives on Oil and Gas Operations. 

[3] The Environmental Protection Agency recognizes two general kinds of pollutants.  Of the six criteria air pollutants it defines, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and particulate matter concern us.  (The others are lead, carbon monoxide, and sulfur dioxide.)  To be exposed to these substances is to risk health, environment, and property.  EPA also recognizes 189 Hazardous Air Pollutants that increase the risk of developing health issues when levels of the substances are high enough and exposure is long enough.  Criteria pollutants are more common and more potent and were written into 1970's Clean Air Act while hazardous pollutants were named in an expansion to that list in 1990.  Better late than never. 

[4] EPA's new rules for fracking, at last released in 2012 although the industry has until 2015 to comply, require that levels of benzene and other toxic pollutants be reduced by 30 percent and VOCs by 25 percent, while methane is to be more adequately recovered and its emissions reduced.  While the ruling was celebrated, some were dismayed that it addressed only air pollution while ignoring water, public health, and other vexations related to fracking.  Of course, EPA is rather feckless in the face of the Halliburton Loophole, which exempts water infected by fracking from EPA oversight.  

***

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

J Dial Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Schooled in psychology and biomedical illustration, of course I became a medical writer!

In 2014 my husband and I and our kitty moved from Colorado, where Jerry had been born, to Canada, where I had been. (Born.)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Who Turned Scientific American?

Seeds of destruction: It's NOT just about food

Who the Frack's Really in Charge?

Fracking: Water Issues--Colorado-centric, but applicable to all

Why Barack Obama Does Not Disappoint Some Folks

Where Have all the Finches Gone?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend