Okay, now you have Obama's Neoconistic objectives with China as its main target and competitor, and you have China competing for the same strategic area, Pakistan, to fulfill its energy needs and establish a strategic footprint in the Arabian Sea, and in the middle of it, the point where US-China strategic objectives intersect: Pakistan.
In order to halt this, the globalists need to block China's access to the Arabian Sea by way of Gwadar. According to BrassTacks, to do this, "there needs to be a "new Pakistan" as indicated in Operation Enduring Turmoil." Operation Enduring Turmoil is PNAC's plan to disassemble Pakistan into three parts. According to a "game plan" drawn out by Lt. Col. Ralph Peters, in a 2006 article of the Armed Forces Journal, "Pakistan's Northwest Frontier," tribes would be reunited with their Afghan brethren [and] would also lose its Baluch territory to Free Baluchistan. The remaining "natural" Pakistan would lie entirely east of the Indus, except for a westward spur near Karachi." With this done, what was once the NWFP, a province of Pakistan, is now part of Afghanistan, and what was once Baluchistan, a province of Pakistan, is now its own state, Free Baluchistan. This would force China to impossibly go through Afghanistan and Free Baluchistan in order to reach the Arabian Sea. Such an arrangement would cut China's route to the Arabian Sea.
...
Now, please focus on our three main actors -- China, US and, in the middle, the strategically important Pakistan. Let's use our common sense, minus logic-clouding details, and consider what happens when the strategically crucial actor in the middle starts straying away from one main actor and moving toward the other.
This is from November, 2009:
"China has sent out an interesting signal ahead of US president Barack Obama's scheduled visit to Beijing by offering a set of advanced fighter jets to Pakistan. It has agreed to sell $1.4 billion worth of jets to Islamabad days ahead of the planned visit of the US president Barack Obama to Shanghai and Beijing on November 15-18.
"The move is expected to jolt the US administration as it works on notes and talking points for Obama's meetings with Chinese leaders. He is expected to discuss Beijing's relationship with India and its role in internal conflicts in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
"Beijing is keen to reduce US influence on Pakistan, which will make it easier for it to deal with India, sources said. Washington's recent decision to extend massive financial assistance to Islamabad is seen in some quarters as a policy setback for China.
...
A year later, in October 2010, the following interesting perspective on how things were heating up between the US and Pakistan is published by Margolis:
"The neoconservative far right in Washington and its media allies again claim Pakistan is a grave threat to US interests and to Israel. Pakistan must be declawed and dismembered, insist the neocons. Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is reportedly being targeted for seizure or elimination by US Special Forces. There is also talk in Washington of dividing Afghanistan into Pashtun, Tajik and Uzbek mini-states, as the US has done in Iraq, and perhaps Pakistan, as well. Little states are easier to rule or intimidate than big ones. Many Pakistanis believe the United States is bent on dismembering their nation. Some polls show Pakistanis now regard the United States as a greater enemy than India.
...
It is important to remember how Obama passed AIPAC neocons' test on Pakistan during his presidential campaign in 2007. Obama said if elected in November 2008 he would be willing to attack inside Pakistan with or without approval from the Pakistani government, "If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won't act, we will," Obama said.
Now, let's fast-forward to early April 2011:
"Pakistan's ambassador to China used a recent celebration of his country's Republic Day to give a rhetoric-filled talk about Beijing-Islamabad relations. If March 23, 1940, was the day the Muslim League decided to establish Pakistan, then the anniversary would be a time to declare that relations with China will define the way forward. "We shall take our bilateral relations to new heights,' Masood Khan proclaimed. [...] Pakistan has been moving into China's sphere of influence for decades and the countries routinely refer to each other as 'all-weather' partners."This year will mark the 60th anniversary of diplomatic relations. 'Even when I was there in 1981, '82, I could see Chinese military factories going up,' says Stephen Cohen, a Pakistan expert at the Brookings Institution. Now, Pakistan represents a major market for China's nuclear and military technology. According to SIPRI, a Swedish think tank, over 40 per cent of Chinese arms exports go to Pakistan -- the largest share of any country China sells to."
Obviously Obama's day-in, day-out bombing of Pakistan, his "let's drone the hell out of them" policy, had backfired, producing the opposite effect for his Neoconistic global hegemony objectives. Now, things begin to really heat up; this is from April 17, 2011:
"President Obama's rhetoric in Delhi had no substance except to rile the Pakistanis. The Delhi card didn't quite work. The Chinese Premier visited Islamabad and pledged $20 billion in investment in Pakistan during the next five years. How about them apples? The Pakistani retort is what it has always been we need 'Friends Not Masters.'
"Britain as a colonial power practiced 'Divide and rule' pitting religious and ethnic differences in the Middle East to rule continents. Bhutto famously theorized that the post-colonial powers were working on a 'unite and rule' strategy forcing Pakistan to work with India against China.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
2
1
1
