404 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 79 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 5/2/09

Blackbox BLOG-O-LECTION Clips

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   2 comments

Bev Harris
Message Bev Harris
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)

(NH): BILL IN PLAY TO BLOCK RIGHT TO KNOW PROCESSES -

Right to know (Freedom of Information) is THE crucial core concept for democratic election systems. New Hampshire legislators are now working on their second attempt to erect barriers to the public right to know.

HB 349 is trying to exempt legislator's e-mails from both right to know and court subpeonas; an earlier bill, HB 53, seeks to remove the secretary of state's office (and other executive agencies) from right to know by redefining what a "public body" is. How the main office controlling public elections can conceivably be deemed "not public" is a question that causes some of us to shudder.

REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THESE BILLS PASS, THEY DON'T REMOVE THE RIGHT, because you can't really "remove" the inalienable rights to self-govern. What these bills seek to do is to put in place a policy to REFUSE TO HONOR the right to know.

Right to know is a necessary part of our inalienable right to self-government, which is key to our right to liberty. Almost all states, and the federal government, have right to know laws, often contextualized with preambles like the following: "Government is the servant of the people, and not the master of them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. We insist on remaining informed so that we may retain control over the instruments of government we have created."

The news link:
Foster's Daily Democrat - April 29, 2009, by Robert M. Cook

http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090429/GJNEWS_01/704299884/- 1/FOSNEWS
E-mail exempt bill goes before Senate

 

* * * *

 

This is a public education message from Black Box Voting:

http://www.blackboxvoting.org

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Bev Harris Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Bev Harris is executive director of Black Box Voting, Inc. an advocacy group committed to restoring citizen oversight to elections.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Black Box Voting: WISCONSIN VOTE SPREAD 29,207? 7,500? Or 6,744?

2008 election results to be routed to private middlemen in Illinois, Colorado & Kentucky

Dear Maine GOP: 1+1+1 does not = 4. Official results are wrong

Racial Profiling on Tennessee Voter Reg Cards

Bev Harris: Actual Accenture Voter List Software Discovered and Downloadable to the Public

BIPARTISANLY YOURS: COAKLEY WON THE HAND COUNTS

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend