Power of Story Send a Tweet        
Best Web OpEds

Four Bad Liberal Arguments For "Compromising" On the Medicare Age

Quicklink Submitted By       Message Amanda Lang     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags  

View Ratings | Rate It


Author 5
Become a Fan
  (9 fans)
It's tempting to read these pieces by Matt Yglesias and Jonathan Chait and decide that, all things considered, liberals should at least consider raising the Medicare age to 67 as part of a budget compromise.

They shouldn't.
'This seems like a useful time for liberals to sort out the difference between budget ideas we don't like and budget ideas we can't or shouldn't accept,' Chait writes. I couldn't agree more. Put this one in the 'can't accept' column.
Here are four arguments for compromising on the Medicare age -- and why they're wrong.
Bad Reason #1: As a bone to throw to the right.
'When the question comes to what concessions the Democrats are going to have to accept,' Chait writes, ' ' raising the Medicare age seems like a sensible bone to throw the right.' That's the first bad reason to compromise. Raising the Medicare age would increase the number of uninsured Americans...
Read the rest of the story HERE:

At blog.ourfuture.org


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It


OpedNews volunteer from 2005 to 2013.

Amanda Lang was a wonderful member of the Opednews team, and the first volunteer editor, for a good number of years being a senior editor. She passed away summer 2014.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -