Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 32 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Sci Tech   

EPA science advisers slammed the agency for ignoring science. Here is what they said:

Author 4578
Message Stephen Fox
Become a Fan
  (33 fans)
EPA HQ - WJ Clinton Building - Main entrance - 2018a.
EPA HQ - WJ Clinton Building - Main entrance - 2018a.
(Image by Wikipedia (commons.wikimedia.org))
  Details   DMCA

Rebuking Trump's 'science,' an EPA panel found shortcomings in regulatory rollbacks; urged EPA to undertake a new risk assessment before proceeding with the landmark air toxics regulations on coal- and oil-fired power plants; EPA should address analytical weaknesses in planned rollback of Obama-era vehicle fuel efficiency standards, concluding in a “commentary” that proposed rollbacks of Clean Water Act protections depart from “EPA recognized science.”

The panel has 44 members providing outside counsel to EPA; drafts were produced by working groups; the full board discusses them later this month. This supplies ammunition to foes of the administration’s agenda. In a statement this morning, the Union of Concerned Scientists, a liberal-leaning advocacy group, cited the review of the scientific studies rule as evidence that the proposal “is ill-considered and scientifically dubious.”

Read the rest of the story HERE:

At www.sciencemag.org

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Stephen Fox Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Early in the 2016 Primary campaign, I started a Facebook group: Bernie Sanders: Advice and Strategies to Help Him Win! As the primary season advanced, we shifted the focus to advancing Bernie's legislation in the Senate, particularly the most (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this quicklink has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

No comments