Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   7 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Ban Cars not Assault Rifles

      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Funny 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

- Advertisement -

If we need to ban assault weapons, then we really need to ban cars.

In the wake of the Sandyhook tragedy, knee jerk reactions are abounding.  But none larger than the cry for the ban on assault weapons and high capacity magazines.  So I decided to do a little research to see how bad this problem really was.  And this is what I found.

The latest FBI Crime Statistic is from 2011.  It does not list the specific weapon used in each homicide, but assault weapons are part of the group called "rifles".  (This includes deer rifles too.)  There were 323 homicides in this category. (As a comparator, 728 homicides were committed with "fists and feet" and 1,694 were committed by "edged weapons".)

This inspired me to look at another leading cause of death in the United States, the automobile. The latest available statistics are from the Center of Disease Control for the year 2010.  In that year, there were 32,886 deaths caused by automobiles, with 10,288 of those being caused by drunk drivers. In addition, of the 1,210 traffic deaths among children ages 0 to 14 years in 2010,  211 (17%) involved an alcohol-impaired driver. Of the 211 child passengers ages 14 and younger who died in alcohol-impaired driving crashes in 2010, over half (131) were riding in the vehicle with the alcohol-impaired driver.  Also in 2010, over 1.4 million drivers were arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol or narcotics and caused $51 billion in damages.

So why the hell haven't we banned cars?  If we are willing to throw the amendment in our constitution that absolutely guarantees all others, firmly under the bus, to rid us of assault weapons, why not the automobile?  The car is not constitutionally protected like the firearm, and was involved in more crime that led to death. Why should you be allowed to own a car in the first place?  There is public transportation available to urban dwellers, and why do you need cars that are really fast anyways.

I live in rural Arizona.  And I own a few assault rifles for protection. Now you folks in the city are always asking, why would I need an assault rifle for protection?  Since we started with some math, lets continue.  Average response time to a 911 call in an urban city, about 5 minutes (and if you are in the middle of a home invasion, the longest 5 minutes of your life).  Now if you live 45 miles from a population center (as is common here), and call 911, the response time will be about 1 hour.  Let that sink in, one hour. So you happen to be visiting me one day, and we observe a group of rough looking travelers appearing on the property, carrying backpacks, and armed with rifles. Now what at this point are you really going to depend on?  You can call 911 and hope that an armed deputy or two will appear within that hour. Or you can let the individuals know you are armed so they may retreat, or defend yourself if required.  At this point would you want to depend on your grandfathers outdated deer rifle, or the best equipment that money can buy, namely an assault rifle?

- Advertisement -

The Sandhook Tragedy overshadowed another spree shooter in a mall earlier in the week, happening in Portland, Oregon, where two shoppers and the gunman lost their lives.  The biggest thing that was not reported (and much different) was that a gentleman by the name of Nick Meli drew his concealed firearm and forced the shooter to retreat, where the shooter subsequently then took his own life.  Had Mr. Meli not been there, and armed, then the death toll would probably have been greater than Sandyhook.

Spree shooters are not hardened criminals.  They are mentally ill people.  But they do recognize the threat of a weapon and stop firing at innocent people in an act of self-interest. And they need help.  That is the area that needs the focus of our anger and frustration.  Our current health care system failed two young men last week, both are dead, and they left innocent victims in their wake. So instead of disarming the potential victims, the focus should be on this broken system.

How long will people hide their heads in the fallacy of "gun free zones"?  What is being created are zones where trained and licensed individuals are disarmed.  There was not a policy like this in Pearl, Mississippi, when in October 1997 the assistant principle retrieved his .45 caliber handgun from his vehicle and stopped a shooting.  So we really need to think what really works before we kill more of our kids.

And stop blaming inanimate objects (at the control of individuals who are not legally allowed to possess them in the first place) for the problems of this world.  This applies to drunk drivers and spree killers alike.  Get mad as hell at the system that lets madmen run around and threaten each and every one of us.  And I will talk about getting rid of my assault rifles, when everyone else is ready to get rid of the bigger killer, cars.

- Advertisement -


Retired renaissance man. Former active duty and reserve US Army enlisted, NCO, and officer. Entrepreneur, I have created, operated and sold/closed 6 small businesses. I have worked for large oil companies, and also as a counselor for an (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ban Cars not Assault Rifles


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

It is time to stop blaming inanimate objects for t... by Timothy O'Neil on Thursday, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:25:52 AM
Cars are means of transportation and as such have ... by Archie on Friday, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:56:00 PM
And that sir is the paradox of the situation! ... by Timothy O'Neil on Saturday, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:15:11 PM
Study: U.S. Gun Fatalitie... by Sister Begonia on Saturday, Dec 22, 2012 at 2:49:23 PM
Sister,With all due respect, we have experimented ... by Timothy O'Neil on Saturday, Dec 22, 2012 at 8:08:43 PM
The day cars are made for the sole purpose of kill... by Sister Begonia on Saturday, Dec 22, 2012 at 2:31:31 PM
First off, I support a very clean environment. &nb... by Timothy O'Neil on Saturday, Dec 22, 2012 at 8:45:55 PM