Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   7 comments

Judge in ACORN Worker Lawsuit Rejects O'Keefe's 'First Amendment' Excuse

Quicklink submitted By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Gustav Wynn     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags

Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 6/5/11

Become a Fan
  (23 fans)
A federal judge rejected James O'Keefe's assertion that his freedom of speech as an "undercover" news gatherer trumps California's prohibition on surreptitious recordings.
O'Keefe said MTV's "Punk'd" set such a precedent, though it obtained releases prior to airing footage of well-known celebrity figures.

The judge also struck down back-stabber Hannah Giles' claim she was not liable because O'Keefe held the hidden camera.

The civil case brought by fired ACORN employee Juan Carlos Vera moves now forward.

O'Keefe is represented pro bono by attorneys hired by CIR, a legal institute co-directed by Larry Arnn of Hillsdale College. Not ironically, his lawyers charge more than the $75K Vera is suing for.

This is the 3rd case brought for the ACORN sting videos and his fourth federal case. O'Keefe has settled out of court once and taken a plea deal once.

Read the rest of the story HERE:


- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -