Note: this email is in response to an article called
How the last presidential election awoke me from an unsound sleep
published at
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_jeanne_n_060722_how_the_last_preside.htm
The radical liberal Bush-haters in this country just never give up. Weinberg's continuing obsession with alleged voter fraud and bias in the 2004 election just piles on the proof for that.
This article wastes an inordinate, if not inexcusable, amount of space and time with its unfounded, unsubstantiated innuendo and flabby, hot-air nonsense about alleged voter fraud in Ohio in 2004. Of course, there was no such thing, and of course, there is no real or substantive evidence of any such thing.
The real issue here is one that has been with us since 2000. In the eyes of the radlib social engineers, no intelligent, mature, sane voter would EVER vote for any candidate or issue except the ones that they support, espouse, and rabidly approve for the American voter. Bush "stole" the White House, don't you know! And evil conservatives and Republicans have hypnotized, beaten, and whipped American voters into placing a Rebulican majority in the Congress since 1994. It's all an evil conspiracy, don't you know, and we will go to any depth of vicious, foul, and unconscionable lies and dissembling to prove it!!
These people refuse to face the truth. From the time he became Washintgon's military administrator in Philadelphia in 1777, Benedict Arnold mounted a treasonous campaign against America, the Congress and its people. He sold out West Point to the British in 1778 for an agreed amount in British Pounds, and for a commission in the British Army as a Brigadier General. And when caught, he was executed for that.
John Kerry was still in uniform in 1971 when he went before the Congress and for purley political and morally reprehensible reasons lied about American atrocities in Vietnam to further his own career and to ingratiate himself with the radical liberal Democrats of the day. He was still in uniform when he joined with Jane Fonda, a treasonous malcontent who went to Hanoi with her own anti-American agenda and who had her picture taken with NVA regulars, sitting in the seat of a Triple-A gun in battery, a gun used to shoot at American pilots. She wore an NVA helmet and grinned widely as she comforted and supported an enemy that killed American fliers and soldiers. He was still in uniform when he flew unauthorized to Paris and met with North Vietnamese negotiators at the Paris peace talks, offering them advice and comfort in their efforts to undermine the United States and its allies.
As a direct result of Kerry's actions, the North Vietnamese recorded and blasted his testimony before Congress over loudspeakers in their prisoner of war camps twenty-four hours a day. They used Kerry's words as an excuse to starve and beat prisoners. No one will every know how many American prisoners of war in Vietnam were tortured or murdered as a result of Kerry's infamous testimony.
And unlike Benedict Arnold, the American Democratic Party ran Kerry for President. God help us if he had ever been elected. He and his fellow radlib Democrats, including especially his bosom buddy Ted Kennedy, would undoubtedly be sending Iran and Syria detailed reports about everything John Negroponte, the CIA, and the NSA are doing to combat terrorism.
Weinberg said virtually nothing of substance or importance in her article. Her words and story (for it was only a simple tale, not a reasoned argumant of any kind) amounted to nothing but the cold, worthless ashes of an old, dead issue that flared for but a second, and that was fueled by hapless rage and a vindictive need to lash out at anyone or anything that doesn't buy into the effete, worn out, hate-based rhetoric of the radical liberal social engineers who will be the demise of the Democratic Party yet.
The article only proves that Weinberg is still asleep at the switch. It is the tale of a sleepwalker still functioning not only in the past, but also in a bizarre and surrealistic world. Weinberg needs a wakeup call and a strong cup of coffee. The 2004 election is over. The world is moving on. The dead-end, outrageous tax-and-spend, dehumanizing radlib social engineering programs have been, or are being, dismantled. Even the Grand Ayatollah of the Democratic Party radlib faith, Bill Clinton, contributed to the start of that.
The American people rejected John Kerry, and for darned good reason. No self-respecting American of any generation could tolerate what Kerry did to American servicemen toward the end of the Vietnam War. No sane American would tolerate Kerry as Commander in Chief under any circumstances.
The radlib Dems have a strong propensity to blow off Kerry's actions and their consequences. They are part of an increasing number of people who believe that somehow, our choices and actions in the past neither have, nor should have, any consequences on the present. They believe that somehow, we should all ingore the past of their selected favorites, and they argue that no matter how heinous, sordid, or evil that past, we need to forget it and "just move on." It's the George Sorros way...MoveOn.Org.
A great philosopher once observed that we are the product of our choices. Now there was a man with a sense of realistic responsibility.
Weinberg could learn a lot from him. Assuming, of course, that she hears that wakeup call and enjoys that first cup of coffee.
My Reply
Right wing supporters of the criminal George Bush are the traitors in my eyes. There's plenty of documentation for claims of vote theft in 2000 and 2004, but right wingnuts don't care about facts or science or reality. They've had so much koolaid, they only pay attention to what propaganda network Fox news tells them. Face, the people remaining supporting Bush are religious fundamentalist extremists who giddily look forward to a rapturous armageddon, greedy tax avoiding parasites and men who feel so inadequate they need George Bush's tough chickenhawk talk to vicariously feel good about themselves.
Rob Kall
Editor
