Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
November 13, 2006 at 11:06:17

View Ratings | Rate It

9 Arguments Used by Environmental Skeptics (and How to Counter Them)

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By William Wilson (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: William Wilson - Writer

  • It costs too much to save the environment.


  • Not so. Take subsidies paid to the fishing industry: "...governments subsidize the destruction of oceanic resources to the tune of $15-30 billion each year. In 2001, subsidies paid to the fishing industry in Japan reached $2.5 billion, equal in value to a quarter of the catch. U.S. fishing subsidies totaled $1.2 billion, exceeding the worth of 30 percent of the U.S. catch.... A global network of marine reserves protecting up to 30 percent of the world's oceans would cost around $13 billion - far less than the subsidies that currently promote overfishing. Such a network would also create some 1 million new jobs and bolster the number of fish that can be caught in nearby waters." (reference, emphases mine)

    Also consider ecosystem services - the economic benefits provided by a healthy environment, like flood control, water filtration, and CO2 absorption. A 1997 paper in Nature (see also here) concluded "For the entire biosphere, the value (most of which is outside the market) is estimated to be in the range of US$16-54 trillion (1012) per year, with an average of US$33 trillion per year. Because of the nature of the uncertainties, this must be considered a minimum estimate." An estimate of the value of Canada's boreal forests put the value of their ecosystem services at $93 billion a year, 9% of Canada's GDP.

    Then there is the Stern report, which stated that it would be far cheaper to spend money to prevent global warming now, rather than trying to deal with its effects later.



  • Environmentalists just want more government restrictions on freedom.


  • Whose freedom?

    Your freedom to drink clean water and breathe clean air, or the freedom of multinational corporations to pollute? Whose rights will be affected if, say, the oceans run out of fish?


  • There is more forest in the USA now than there was 100 years ago!


  • This is true. But is it healthy forest?

    There is more forest now because most of the continent was deforested in the 19th century. Before European settlers arrived, there were more than a billion acres of forest in the US (including Alaska). Now there are about 750 million acres, young, fragmented, and radically changed from the pre - European condition: 10% of the 800 tree species in the USA are non native species.

    The latest data ("Forest Resources of the United States, 2002") says that about 56 million acres of that are tree plantations - not natural forests but large stands of particular trees that offer a profit but poor habitat. Another 504 million acres are classified as timberland - land that could produce timber - and is occasionally logged for that purpose. In addition, forests are fragmented by roads and urban and suburban sprawl. This is one reason for the rapid decline in the population of the Cerulean Warbler and other species which require large tracts of undisturbed forest.

    As economy and population booms, these pressures will increase. "In the last decade, the South lost 2.9 million acres to sprawl while another 4.5 million acres of native forest were replaced with fast growing pine plantations. In addition, logging is predicted to increase across the South by 50% by the year 2040 with a loss of as much as 31 million acres of forested land." (reference)

    The National Atlas website has a fascinating tool that lets you look at forest fragmentation in the USA, as well as a lot of other data. I also highly recommend The Hidden Forest by John Luoma as an overview of forest ecology.


  • Polar bear populations are actually growing, so melting ice from global warming isn't a threat.


  • Polar bear populations are increasing. This is mainly due to a global ban on hunting in the 1970's. Since that time polar bear population has increased from 5,000 worldwide to 20,000 or so.

    But the polar bears are showing considerable signs of stress. "Polar bears in western Hudson Bay weigh about 15 percent less (about 150 pounds less for an adult male) than they did 30 years ago." (reference) The Hudson Bay bear population is dropping, with documented decline in reproductive rates and survival of offspring.

    Next Page  1  |  2

     

    http://futuregeek.net

    William Wilson is a writer and activist living in the American midwest. He blogs at http://naturematters.wordpress.com.

    The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
    and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

    Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

     

    Book Recommendations for "Activism Environmental Economy"
    Resistance in an Amazonian Community: Huaorani Organizing Against the Global Economy
    by L Ziegler-Otero

    $25.00
    Lowest New Price $20.98

    Number of pages: 188
    Publisher: Berghahn Books

    The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy
    by Neil Carter

    $29.99
    Lowest New Price $9.99

    Number of pages: 382
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press

    Killing Me Softly: Toxic Waste, Corporate Profit, and the Struggle for Environmental Justice
    by Eddie J. Girdner

    $20.00
    Lowest New Price $10.69

    Number of pages: 171
    Publisher: Monthly Review Press

    The Politics of Sustainable Development: Citizens, Unions and the Corporations
    by Laurie E. Adkin

    $28.99
    Lowest New Price $24.99

    Number of pages: 250
    Publisher: Black Rose Books

    View All Book Recommendations

    Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

    FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

    Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
    4 comments
    To view all comments:
    Expand Comments
     

    Tim Lambert and DDT by RWDB on Tuesday, Nov 14, 2006 at 6:39:06 AM
    Tim Lambert and DDT by William Wilson on Tuesday, Nov 14, 2006 at 2:55:32 PM
    About the myth that saving the environment is too expensive by 007s bretta on Thursday, Nov 16, 2006 at 9:35:03 AM
    Living dying Proof - We were poisoned by Iris Brooks on Monday, Mar 5, 2007 at 1:26:44 AM

     
    Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


     

     

     

    Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

    Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

    Powered by Populum