Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
February 20, 2008 at 10:31:40

View Ratings | Rate It

Obama Doesn't Take From "Special Interests?" He's Not correct

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Timothy V. Gatto (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Timothy V. Gatto - Writer

The media is all abuzz with this presidential primary race between the two Democratic contenders. They are so excited and I’m feeling like a zombie. I can’t watch the television or go on the big websites because I am thoroughly disgusted, and so totally not interested. I don’t care what kind of “spin” they put on these two politicians; I can’t stand either of them. If it’s not totally clear in every Liberal/Progressive’s head’s by now, it really should be. These two candidates represent just about everything, and everyone that we have been screaming about since Bush came into office.

Let’s get down to the real nitty-gritty on this campaign. We all know that campaign finance is just about the biggest problem we have. We are constantly reminded of this every time we read or hear of the cost of running a successful bid for the White House. It’s fact that the candidates this cycle have outspent the previous candidates in the last Presidential election. We should realize that it is all about money. It’s not about our money however; it is all about corporate money from the Military Industrial Corporate Complex. Many people get a knee-jerk reaction to that phrase. Let me clear the air and present some facts that will underscore exactly what I am saying here; that there is absolutely no difference between the three corporate candidates that the MICC media has presented to us. Oh, by the way, Mussolini’s definition of fascism; corporatism.

Let’s see where these candidates get their money to convince you to vote for them;

Hillary Clinton;

Goldman Sachs $413,361 Morgan Stanley $362,700 Citigroup Inc $350,895 Lehman Brothers $241,870 JP Morgan Chase & Co $214,880 EMILY's List $213,266 National Amusements Inc $210,010 Kirkland & Ellis $179,676 Greenberg Traurig Llp $177,800 Skadden, Arps et al $167,796 Merrill Lynch $165,042 Cablevision Systems $145,313 Time Warner $144,977 Microsoft Corp $143,459 Bear Stearns $141,835 Latham & Watkins $138,598 Patton Boggs $137,200 Ernst & Young $126,865 PricewaterhouseCoopers $121,939

Barack Obama:

Goldman Sachs $421,763 Ubs Ag $296,670 Lehman Brothers $250,630 National Amusements Inc $245,843 JP Morgan Chase & Co $243,848 Sidley Austin LLP $226,491 Citigroup Inc $221,578 Exelon Corp $221,517 Skadden, Arps Et Al $196,420 Jones Day $181,996 Harvard University $172,324 Citadel Investment Group $171,798 Time Warner $155,383 Morgan Stanley $155,196 Google Inc $152,802 University of California $143,029 Jenner & Block $136,565 Kirkland & Ellis $134,738 Wilmerhale Llp $119,245 Credit Suisse Group $118,250

John McCain:

Merrill Lynch $155,950 Citigroup Inc $153,362 Blank Rome LLP $141,401 Greenberg Traurig LLP $130,587 Goldman Sachs $85,252 Univision Communications $82,000 IDT Corp $79,250 Bank of New York Mellon $74,000 Bridgewater Assoc $72,100 MGM Mirage $70,400 Irvine Co Apartment Community $66,100 JP Morgan Chase & Co $65,485 Credit Suisse Group $65,000 Pinnacle West Capital $64,000 Lehman Brothers $63,450 Wachovia Corp $58,675 Cisco Systems $56,650 Morgan Stanley $55,701 Blackstone Group $47,950 MacAndrews & Forbes $45,000

Mike Gravel:

Floor Surplus inc $2,550 New Perspectives Quarterly $2,300 Jim Stork for Congress $2,300 Decode Biostructures $2,008 Mitchell Gold Co $2,000 Hewlett-Packard $2,000 Exxon Mobil $2,000 Paypal Inc $1,695 Worldwide Media $1,500 Internet Communication $1,000 Urburn Univiersity $1,000 Ogim $1,000 Crisis Consultants Group $1,000 VOTEC Corp $1,000 Pictures Inc $1,000 Hypertone Inc $1,000 Apple Inc $1,000 Witness for Peace $1,000 American Ecology Corp $1,000 Treeman Inc $875

Is there something a wee bit fishy up there? Seems like the same people are financing the same “top three”, Is it me being suspicious or is it really true? By the way, these contributions are from employees of these companies that give and are “bundled” together by their employers. Are they being patriotic? Some of these corporations aren’t even American corporations!

Let’s look at the Military Industrial Complex:

Election Cycle 2008*

Total Contributions $9,307,088

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://liberalpro.blogspot.com

Tim was banned from the site for posting private email from the publisher to him on his blog, and then attacking the publisher and the site in emails and articles. OEN has no responsibility to publish articles from people who attack the (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Corporations Democratic Media"
Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies (Massey Lecture)
by Noam Chomsky

$39.95
Lowest New Price $25.02

Number of pages:
Publisher: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC Audio)

Where America Went Wrong: And How To Regain Her Democratic Ideals (Financial Times Prentice Hall Books)
by John R. Talbott

$24.95
Lowest New Price $5.35

Number of pages: 288
Publisher: Financial Times Prentice Hall

Popular Sovereignty: Being Some Thoughts on Democratic Reform
by Charles Anthony Jun.

$23.99

Number of pages: 228
Publisher: Adamant Media Corporation

The Quotable Conservative: The Giants of Conservatism on Liberty, Freedom, Individual Responsibility, and Traditional Virtues
by Irwin M. Berent

$12.00
Lowest New Price $25.00

Number of pages: 288
Publisher: Adams Media Corporation

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
66 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Precisely by delia on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:59:59 AM
Excellent work, Tim by ardee D. on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:23:49 AM
What is sad for our nation by Michael Shaw on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:24:42 PM
How in the world by coyote on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 6:51:27 PM
Well said by ardee D. on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:53:07 AM
Mesmerized loyalist? by Michael Shaw on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:22:06 PM
Look up projection in your funk and wagnall's by ardee D. on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:09:01 PM
And you sir by Michael Shaw on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:24:53 PM
Dude, your nonsense is close to raving now by ardee D. on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:54:21 PM
The differences between you and I are clear Ardee.... by Michael Shaw on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 7:34:59 PM
A final note by ardee D. on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:01:19 AM
Well Coyote by Michael Shaw on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:15:33 PM
OBAMA SPE CIAL INTERESTS by Guajolotl on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:24:39 AM
My Motives by Timothy V. Gatto on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:18:08 PM
Some Additional Data by welshTerrier2 on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:34:00 AM
You should have made one thing perfectly clear by Michael Shaw on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 2:20:28 PM
We have Clinton McCain and Obama to choose from because... by erik mouse on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:09:36 PM
What's the answer? by Shelly Thomas on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:57:44 AM
42 42?! by erik mouse on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:21:51 AM
erik mouse by Michael Shaw on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 1:47:48 PM
One quibble by ardee D. on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:00:46 PM
Yeah, I still think a manufacturing base is important by erik mouse on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:22:51 PM
I cannot agree in total by ardee D. on Saturday, Feb 23, 2008 at 8:46:39 AM
disconnecting money from elections by Michael Shaw on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 1:41:59 PM
Accepting money from corporate interests in an election.... by Michael Shaw on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 2:06:57 PM
Why Didn't Kuchinch or Paul Take Their Money by Timothy V. Gatto on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:26:15 PM
Timothy, why are Kucinich and Paul by Michael Shaw on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 1:22:35 PM
You really need to step off dude. by ardee D. on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:28:05 PM
Ardee by Rob Kall on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:57:17 AM
That is simply not true by Michael Shaw on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 1:34:00 PM
Let's take your definition of corporatism by welshTerrier2 on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 10:34:18 PM
No Welsh Terrier by Michael Shaw on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 7:07:40 PM
To MichaelShaw by welshTerrier2 on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 7:51:22 PM
I'm Outa Here by Timothy V. Gatto on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 4:12:52 PM
Let's be clear here. by Rob Kall on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 5:03:45 PM
Censorship is not good by Shelly Thomas on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:07:46 AM
Civility is important but words matter too by welshTerrier2 on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:56:46 AM
I didn't change the title. I told Gatto to. by Rob Kall on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:53:58 AM
During the Last Debate W/Edwards by Timothy V. Gatto on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:59:53 AM
In his own words: Obama admits his duplicity by welshTerrier2 on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 1:07:06 PM
I must say by Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 9:16:39 AM
I agree by John R Moffett on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 6:42:49 PM
One Thing by Timothy V. Gatto on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 7:51:48 PM
with all sincerity.... by Mitch p. on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:26:04 PM
with all sincerity...again by mikel paul on Wednesday, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:31:50 PM
A privilege, not a right by Frank J. Ranelli on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:17:05 AM
Pompous much? by ardee D. on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 7:02:12 AM
Some Clarity by Frank J. Ranelli on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:15:07 AM
It's still censorship by Shelly Thomas on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:50:07 AM
First, I merely asked Tim to not use the word liar by Rob Kall on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:21:40 AM
If The article is Good Enough For Reuters by Timothy V. Gatto on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:42:19 AM
The Facts by Frank J. Ranelli on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:22:15 AM
Who Invited You? by Timothy V. Gatto on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:38:38 AM
My point exactly in my prior posts by Frank J. Ranelli on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:28:39 AM
Who respects the NY TIMES? by coyote on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:27:22 PM
Examples by Frank J. Ranelli on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:45:40 AM
Is this the peoples forum? by ardee D. on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:21:18 PM
Amazing by coyote on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:02:33 PM
And finally by coyote on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 5:33:12 PM
Excellent work by ardee D. on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 6:05:10 PM
Hey ardee by coyote on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:00:39 PM
Link failed to work by ardee D. on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 12:50:00 PM
What next? Public Financing by GeoRip on Thursday, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:34:13 PM
wow by Anthony Wade on Friday, Feb 22, 2008 at 9:45:27 AM
You never let me down by ardee D. on Sunday, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:18:15 AM
Obama by Ty on Saturday, Feb 23, 2008 at 2:19:14 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum