Tags for This Article:

Media (2714)  Congress (2641)  Military (2589)  Government (2452)  Torture (1182)  Politics (1137)  Money (891)  Law (872)  Iraq (849)  Change (794)  Corporations (751)  History (648)  Presidency (612)  Issues (331)  Surveillance (308)  Citizens (297)  Ideas (262)  Issues-Advocacy (53) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
January 9, 2008 at 00:59:06

Headlined on 1/9/08:
The Issues The Candidates Won't Touch (Part I)

by Timothy V. Gatto     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

The battle for the Presidency has captivated America as it always has, from the time of Washington’s oath of inauguration to the present day. Americans read about the candidates and their message and yearn for a leader that will unite the country and solve our differences. We might be Republicans, Democrats or Independents but party is not the overriding concern of the majority of Americans, it is the message of each candidate that drives us to the polling booths. The message and the small glimmer of hope that is held out to each and every one of us that longs for something better, something that can unite us and help us to overcome the many problems we face as a nation.

This election is no different. It seems that no matter how many times we have believed in one politician or another, only to find that we have been deceived again, in four short years we again grasp the mantle of hope and find ourselves again passionately supporting another “agent of change” that will right the wrongs and bring a balance to domestic and foreign policy that lives up to the ideals that we all believe America stands for, only to be let down with a crashing thud as we see the partisan bickering and the negative “spin” put on all of the ideas that we had supported just months before. This election of 2008 is no different than any other election before it

.

While the problems that confront us as a nation have grown to a point in our history that almost dwarfs the problems that came before this election, the individuals that have surfaced to lead us in perhaps one of the most troubling times of American history, are mediocre at best. The ideas that they have presented us with are lackluster and offer no true vision. The ideas that have been presented for American consumption offer no new ways to bring us together, nor do they offer salient ideas of how to fix a system that has shown itself to be incompetent and deadlocked in partisan bickering. The new America that so many Americans yearn for has not found a champion in those that are now vying for the Presidency. Here are five categories that no major candidates have addressed specifically. The five categories listed have been the subject of numerous articles written by people from all walks of life. While we are in the heat of the Primary season in the Presidential campaigns, I believe it is important not to overlook these issues. This may be our only opportunity to get the right person for the job of President before we lose our representative republic forever.

1. The corporate hold on the American political system.

While some candidates decry the way that corporations have managed to control who gets nominated and thus elected, there is no candidate that speaks about how this nation can rid itself from corporate influence. Some candidates allude to the fact that corporate forces including the mainstream media that is owned by a small number of individuals and corporations including General Electric and Westinghouse as well as individuals such as Rupert Murdock and corporatists such as Mitt Romney (Whose company owns a controlling interest in Clear Channel Communications), they have not proposed anything to rectify the situation. The corporate PAC’s and the corporate donations through “bundling” have a stranglehold on Congress that has become accustomed to relying on this money to fund their multi-million dollar campaigns. Between controlling the media and the purse strings for campaign money, they have effectively become the deciding arbiter of who runs for office and who doesn’t. Meanwhile there isn’t a candidate that has proposed anything to stop the corporate excesses from continuing.

2. The erosion of our civil liberties.

In this particular area of American life, nothing has been as dramatic as our loss of civil liberties. We have had a President in office that has thought nothing of using electronic surveillance on American citizens without going through a secret FISA Court that was expressly set up so that the Federal Government could monitor conversations that could affect our national security as long as the government requested a warrant 90 days after the fact! Yet this President could not even do that and Congress still has failed to address this issue. Not one of the candidates has decried the use of electronic “eavesdropping” on American citizens. This isn’t the only case of our civil liberties being usurped. A National ID Card is scheduled to be implemented in May of this year. Now, as Americans we must prove to any government official that we are American citizens and that we have a right to be here. The Military Commissions Act of 2006 takes away the writ of Habeas Corpus from any individual suspected of being a terrorist. The Patriot Act allows the home of anyone suspected of being a terrorist to be searched without the presence of the occupant and without even telling the occupant that their home was searched. The Warner Defense Bill (The revamped Insurrection Act) takes the power of the States National Guards away from the Governors of the States by the President to be used as law enforcement in violation of posse comitatus, thereby letting the National Guards of each State to be used against the people in the event of martial law. Presidential Signing Statements in which the President has the ability to only follow those bills in which he signs into law that he agrees with. First Amendment Zones that are roped of or fenced areas that people are allowed to demonstrate in that are mostly away from sight of the media or the participants of the event that is being demonstrated against, effectively muzzling Americans First Amendment rights.

3. The Military Industrial Complex

The point here is not to blame everything on the MIC, but to take a good look at how much this nation chooses to spend on its military. When we spend 51% of our budget on military expenditures (this does not include the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan), we must also look at what we are sacrificing in other areas to compete with the two closest nations as it comes to military spending, Russia and China that spend 6% of the money that we do on their defense capabilities.* *http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/ArmsTrade/Spending.asp

The only candidates that address this issue are Paul, Gravel and Kuchinich. Where are the other candidates on this issue? If you listen to the Republican field of Presidential contenders, they call for more spending on our military. How can the candidates fund health insurance for all and better schools and better pay for teachers when fully half of our budget goes to military procurement? Who are we defending this nation from that we would sacrifice 50 cents out of every dollar? This is happening as the number of people in uniform gets smaller every year. How do we defend this massive spending to the other nations on earth? Since when is the way we manage our budget not part of the election rhetoric?

4. The Crimes committed by the Bush Administration.

This is not an attack section of this article. The facts are that President Bush and Vice-President Cheney have repeatedly lied about issues that led us into a war with Iraq. They have engaged in illegal surveillance of American citizens, they have condoned the use of torture on suspected terrorists and they have engaged in a practice called “extraordinary rendition” in which suspected terrorists have been put on an aircraft and delivered to countries that practice torture to gain information. Where is the outrage on this issue by any of the leading candidates? I could go on at length but I choose only to bring up those things that have been proven. Before I leave this particular subject however, I would also like to hear any of the candidates’ views on Administration officials that expose a covert CIA Officer’s cover.

5. The Truth about September 11th, 2001.

Some polls show that over 50% of the American people do not believe that the official report by the 9/11 Commission answered all the questions that have been asked about 9/11. There are many engineers and other professional people that believe that the timeline and the consequences of two jetliners crashing into The World Trade Center are flawed. There are many unsolved puzzles as to why people took out “puts” on the airlines the next day and made extraordinary amounts of money. There are also questions as to why the Bin Laden family was given preferential treatment to get them out of the country when all other aircraft were grounded. I will not get into any conspiracy theories but only wonder why these things that are known facts were not investigated. The Presidential candidates ask none of these questions and I wonder if when one of them takes office will these questions remain forever unanswered?

Most of the candidates speak of “change”. My question is change to what? This nation certainly needs change, not to become something new, but to regain what seems to have been lost. We need to regain our sense of purpose, to allow America to become once again the shining light of opportunity. We need to see integrity in our elected officials. Instead of doing what is best for the party they belong to, to do the best for the American people. We need to return to the rule of law, not only for the citizens to follow, but also for government officials to follow. We need to help Americans at home instead of spending taxpayer’s money to ensure that everyone in the world thinks and acts as we do. We need to see the lock on public office that the two-party system has in place broken so that party politics will not override the will of the people. We need to stop the mega-wealthy and trans-national corporations from using loophole in the tax code to hide money in offshore accounts. We need regulation of trade so that huge monopolies such as the one that controls our mass media doesn’t take place again. We need to stop giving tax-breaks and subsidies to the oil companies such as Exxon/Mobile that posted the largest corporate profits in history this year.

 1  |  2

 

http://liberalpro.blogspot.com

Tim was banned from the site for posting private email from the publisher to him on his blog, and then attacking the publisher and the site in emails and articles. OEN has no responsibility to publish articles from people who attack the site. Tim's accusations that he was banned for his political positions are untrue. Check his articles. He repetitively wrote about and had published exactly the things he claimed he was banned for doing.
Former Chairman of the Liberal Party of America, Tim is a retired Army Sergeant. He currently lives in South Carolina. A regular contributor to OpEdNews, he is the author of Kimchee Kronicles and is currently at work on a new novel.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Spurl      Tag!RawSugar      Shadows Tag!      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
29 comments

Fierce patriot and defender of the Constitution. All I want for Christmas is for Ron Paul to win the Republican nomination.
Margie LaupheimerFierce patriot and defender of the Constitution. All I want for Christmas is for Ron Paul to win the Republican nomination.

The Issues The Candidates Won't Touch

How can you possibly call these issues that no candidate has touched? Have you seen none of the debates? Ron Paul has addressed every one of these issues and then some. The possible exception is the Sept. 11th attacks.

He has then gone way beyond these issues to the root of the problems including US nation building, policing the world, the Illegal income tax that funds the war(s), the Federal Reserve, the tyranny of our government and it's assault on our civil liberties.

How can you say these things? What planet are you living on?

 

by Margie Laupheimer (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments) on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 6:30:25 AM
 


SW Texas ultra-liberal
john riggsSW Texas ultra-liberal

How unthankful can You be

This comment has been flagged and is awaiting review by the editors -
Reason: Other

The wealthy elites deserve to run the elections and the country. They are more educated,better and stronger than we are. The BIBLE says that he who has should get more, and them that aint got should have what little they have given to them thats got, and who are we to wrestle even against GOD himself ?  Besides, the elite does us a big favor, money is the root of all evil, so they are protecting us from evil. And everbody who's anybody knows that "GOD blesses those that bless Israel" so its good that we give them billions and turn control of our nation over to them. If the sick and homeless here in America were righteous, they wouldnt be sick and homeless. And the hungry in America should get a job, "he who does not work should not eat" if the hungry deserved a job they would have been born in Taiwan. All this progressive social crap is an evil conspiracy. This is GOD'S country and things are just the way they are by divine mandate. If God wanted You to share in oil wealth or real estate your forefathers would have killed indians and seized their land, it just is not in the cards. 

Just ask a Catholic, poverty is righteousness, I thank the ruling elite for making me the bastion of holiness that I am. The elite have removed the burden of selecting candidates and weighing issues from our shoulders, and I for one am very relieved. I can now dedicate all my time to the pursuit of spiritual matters. Yes dear brothers and cisterns, this is GOD"S country, so quit raising hell about who he has running it and enough already with all the commie retterick about distribution of wealth and civil liberty. Dubya gets his orders directly from above in an audible voice, and his sheep hear his voice.

by john riggs (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 324 comments) on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 7:26:09 AM
 


I am a founding partner of Berkana Technology Group, a consulting and technology development company. Our current focus is engine efficiency technology and renewable energy.
Austin LiuI am a founding partner of Berkana Technology Group, a consulting and technology development company. Our current focus is engine efficiency technology and renewable energy.

How willfully blind can you be?

Sir, you are willfully blind. The scriptures also say the following, which you conveniently ignore: 

James 2:1-7

My brothers, as believers in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ, don't show favoritism.2Suppose a man comes into your meeting wearing a gold ring and fine clothes, and a poor man in shabby clothes also comes in. 3If you show special attention to the man wearing fine clothes and say, "Here's a good seat for you," but say to the poor man, "You stand there" or "Sit on the floor by my feet," 4have you not discriminated among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?

 5Listen, my dear brothers: Has not God chosen those who are poor in the eyes of the world to be rich in faith and to inherit the kingdom he promised those who love him? 6But you have insulted the poor. Is it not the rich who are exploiting you? Are they not the ones who are dragging you into court? 7Are they not the ones who are slandering the noble name of him to whom you belong?

 _______________

You turn a blind eye towards the disgusting abuses of this administration. If you are one of the sheep, clean out your own ears, because you have a seriously twisted idea of what the "master's voice" is. The Master does not command people to commit sin and to lie; there is no deceit in his commands. The Bush administration has deceived the Christian community as a whole, and his despicable actions have led many to blaspheme the name of God. Don't let yourself be deceived any longer. David Kuo, the former second in command in Bush's faith based initiatives program gave the inside scoop on how deeply this administration exploited the faithful. See for yourself:

Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DkUBfOLZH4

Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWMLXAFO0Kk 

by Austin Liu (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 2 comments) on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 11:45:51 AM
 


I am a homeopath. I have a doctorate in Naturopathic medicine, with a dissertation on spina bifida; preventive, and maintenance protocols that do not discount mainstream medical practices. I believe that when all is said and done the karma we send will be the karma that comes back to us. Jesus said love your enemies. What a tough mandate. Voltaire said information is light. I think that blurred and sweeping perceptions are why we need to talk together. Thanks for the love and light brought t...

to see more of bio, click on member name

jaine bensonI am a homeopath. I have a doctorate in Naturopathic medicine, with a dissertation on spina bifida; preventive, and maintenance protocols that do not discount mainstream medical practices. I believe that when all is said and done the karma we send will be the karma that comes back to us. Jesus said love your enemies. What a tough mandate. Voltaire said information is light. I think that blurred and sweeping perceptions are why we need to talk together. Thanks for the love and light brought t...

to see more of bio, click on member name

folks this guy's argument is the religious right platform

That is why aipac and the us are embedded in pre-apocalyptic thinking...it was promulgated in the 70's with the televangelist movement.  The hypnosis that accompanies this thinking is to never question the rest of the bible, like thou shalt not kill, steal, and the motivator for those, thou shalt not covet.  The commandment the most flagrantly ignored however is simply taking G-d's name in vain...who has the in with God to say vainly that God told them whatever; that they know God told them to take Israel and shun, castout, villify, etc the Palestinians?  How vain to think that God thoughts aren't higher than yours?  We need to question the religious right platform in the literal take back israel movement based on their rhetoric...does the torah/the law mean nothing, making null and void the commandments from Moses in light of fear that God will strike you if you arenot literal ?  Literal interprtation of wiping away the palestinian presence in the holy land,  is a fear based function of not taking the fundamental texts as seriously as the ones someone vainly assumes they know better than the rest of us.   Compassion and common sense are where in this equation?  Is it common sense to give israeli soldiers meds in their rations that cause side effects of aggression?  Is it common sense to love the bible, and leave out main parts of the rule of law?  Is it compassion to leave sick people at checkpoints not letting passage through so that they will die there, when the same guards might have even had a family member treated as such in the WWII?  Well, my God is love and if God is Love and loves us every one, then fear is not the factor to drive the action home, now is it.  No, get the whole truth, read the whole book.  Anyone who leads the children astray with fear and confusion is not of love then, are they.   

by jaine benson (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 4 diaries, 33 comments) on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 12:47:42 PM
 


USAF 1986 - 1991Disabled VetMensa Member 1992
RLAnchorsUSAF 1986 - 1991Disabled VetMensa Member 1992

John Reread your Bible

The Bible says "the love of money is the root of all evil" in otherwords "greed is the root of all evil". So much for supporting the elite!

by RLAnchors (6 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 39 comments) on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 4:28:15 PM
 


Having lived six decades now, I've had a lot of experiences! Grew up in a family often oppressed because of our faith - we stood for peace and against war, and for the rights of all regardless of ethnic background. Active from youth in peace and civil rights. Vietnam-era draft resister. Worked for a while for peace and social justice groups, and then became a civil servant. Felt a call to a consistent life ethic, and am currently serving as President of Consistent Life. All this is out of Chr...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Bill SamuelHaving lived six decades now, I've had a lot of experiences! Grew up in a family often oppressed because of our faith - we stood for peace and against war, and for the rights of all regardless of ethnic background. Active from youth in peace and civil rights. Vietnam-era draft resister. Worked for a while for peace and social justice groups, and then became a civil servant. Felt a call to a consistent life ethic, and am currently serving as President of Consistent Life. All this is out of Chr...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Absence of advocacy for change

Mostly on track (I'm not convinced the last issue is real, but the others certainly are).  None of the candidates deemed to have any chance advocate change.

You note that most of the Republican candidates want to increase military spending, but fail to note that Clinton, Obama and Edwards all have that as part of their campaign platforms as well (and all of their records show consistent support for bloated military spending).  No dissent is tolerated on this.  The Senate voted unanimously on the budget resolution to give Bush what he asked for the military to the penny.  It's really more like a one-party system with two branches than a two-party system.

by Bill Samuel (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 180 comments) on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 8:56:27 AM
 


I am a musician, homeschool mother of three, and Ron Paul supporter.
wgadgetI am a musician, homeschool mother of three, and Ron Paul supporter.

I have two words for you:

 

Ron Paul

by wgadget (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 15 comments) on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 9:31:52 AM
 


American against War and Violence. Writer, English Teacher, Inventor, Creator of the First Manmade Floating Farm On The Ocean.... My companies name is ACET: Algae Charcoal Ethanol Technicorp. We grow Algae for Oil.
Dom JermanoAmerican against War and Violence. Writer, English Teacher, Inventor, Creator of the First Manmade Floating Farm On The Ocean.... My companies name is ACET: Algae Charcoal Ethanol Technicorp. We grow Algae for Oil.

You Forgot One Tim!

I agree Tim, and I seriously think you forgot one. And that is Impeachment. They never talk about it on the campaign trail. I think if we have Impeachment it will solve many of the issues you brought up. Frankly because no impeachment has ever been successful. What does it take to get a convicted Impeachment in this country? Bush and Cheney qualify hands down in my opinion. Ron Paul never mentioned a word about Impeachment, as he struts  and flaps his wings for the Republican criminals who support Bush. Who is he trying to hoodwink?

You know it is like watching children in a play with this election cycle. No one does the real outlook to our nation in what it should represent, or go after impeachment and bring justice to our deformed dysfunctional character. History proves we are accomplished liars, murders, invaders, occupiers, rapists, and drug dealers.

I invite you to read my article: Hillary the Link to Impeachment. http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_dom_jerm_080109_hillary_the_link_to_.htm

If only she would do the right thing and put the impeachment process in motion, I think that would say volumes in moving in a positive direction; because now these hucksters will know they can't get away with it ANY MORE.

by Dom Jermano (20 articles, 0 quicklinks, 40 diaries, 934 comments) on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 9:34:38 AM
 


I have been working as an Architectural Designer for about 25 years. Because of a life tranformation and an awareness of things going on in our world, I found myself disinchanted with what most of us strives for and that is being successful (making a lot of money and having a lot of stuff).I am now focusing on starting a foundation for the preservation of tribal people and the environment. In the early 90's I developed an appreciation and respect for tribal cutlures and I hope I ca...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Rick TheileI have been working as an Architectural Designer for about 25 years. Because of a life tranformation and an awareness of things going on in our world, I found myself disinchanted with what most of us strives for and that is being successful (making a lot of money and having a lot of stuff).I am now focusing on starting a foundation for the preservation of tribal people and the environment. In the early 90's I developed an appreciation and respect for tribal cutlures and I hope I ca...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Supporting impeachment

Ron Paul is supporting impeachment, but he wants it to go through the proper process dictated by law. I don't think the impeachment issue should be an issue talked about for the running of the Presidency. Paul does talk about getting our rights back that Bush and others in congress are trying to take away. This includes both parties. 

by Rick Theile (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 49 comments) on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 11:18:28 AM
 


Skin diver, spear fisher, trash collector, roughneck, scuba diver, football player, tennis player, mechanical engineer, aerospace engineer, husband, father, math teacher, fisherman.
Paul RyeSkin diver, spear fisher, trash collector, roughneck, scuba diver, football player, tennis player, mechanical engineer, aerospace engineer, husband, father, math teacher, fisherman.

This was Ron Paul's statement in Congress

"Mr. Speaker, I rise, reluctantly, in favor of the motion to table House Resolution 799, Impeaching Richard B. Cheney, Vice President of the United States, of high crimes and misdemeanors, and in favor of referring that resolution to the House Judiciary Committee for full consideration. I voted to table this resolution not because I do not share the gentleman from Ohio's desire to hold those responsible for the Iraqi debacle accountable; but rather, because I strongly believe that we must follow established protocol in matters of such importance. During my entire time in Congress, I have been outspoken in my opposition to war with Iraq and Iran. I have warned my colleagues and the administration against marching toward war in numerous speeches over the years, and I have voted against every appropriation to continue the war on Iraq.

I have always been strongly in favor of vigorous congressional oversight of the executive branch, and I have lamented our abrogation of these Constitutional obligations in recent times. I do believe, however, that this legislation should proceed through the House of Representatives following regular order, which would require investigation and hearings in the House Judiciary Committee before the resolution proceeds to the floor for a vote. This time-tested manner of moving impeachment legislation may slow the process, but in the long run it preserves liberty by ensuring that the House thoroughly deliberates on such weighty matters. In past impeachments of high officials, including those of Presidents Nixon and Clinton, the legislation had always gone through the proper committee with full investigation and accompanying committee report.

I noted with some dismay that many of my colleagues who have long supported the war changed their vote to oppose tabling the motion for purely political reasons. That move was a disrespectful to the Constitutional function of this body and I could not support such actions with my vote.

I was pleased that the House did vote in favor of sending this legislation to the Judiciary Committee, which essentially directs the committee to examine the issue more closely than it has done to this point."

 

So, it appears that Dr. Paul does support impeachment, and he is following proper procedure and past precedent.

by Paul Rye (6 articles, 1 quicklinks, 13 diaries, 253 comments) on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 7:35:38 PM
 


Brett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.
Brett PaatschBrett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.

Interesting

"This time-tested manner of moving impeachment legislation may slow the process, but in the long run it preserves liberty by ensuring that the House thoroughly deliberates on such weighty matters."

Perhaps Ron Paul could be pro impeachment. But this doesn't prove either that he is or that he isn't.  Not yet.

It does underscore the importance of activists being aware of where the impeachment ball is at all times. And who has carriage of that ball.  Right now despite the fireworks, hype and hoopla of the media and the Presidential election the actual impeachment ball is squarely with the House Judiciary Committee members (and with the citizens they represent if those citizens are still paying attention).  

by Brett Paatsch (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 16 diaries, 769 comments) on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 11:31:39 PM
 


Author of four books, part-time college professor, Ph.D American history Carnegie Mellon University.Graduate work in Clark University, Gratz College of Jewish studies.
philip rosenAuthor of four books, part-time college professor, Ph.D American history Carnegie Mellon University.Graduate work in Clark University, Gratz College of Jewish studies.

Issues

Oboma and Hillary both will keep sizable troops in Iraq. They are hawks in a dove's body. Their recent voting record gives them "F" on war and liberties. This is an excellent commentary. Ron Paul on domestic issues lives in 1895

by philip rosen (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 87 comments) on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 10:36:42 AM
 


It is never the masses that make the difference, it is always the individual which makes the difference. Thank you for letting me be myself today.
Jeanette DoneyIt is never the masses that make the difference, it is always the individual which makes the difference. Thank you for letting me be myself today.

PLEASE GOOGLE RON PAUL

With a little homework, you could retitle your article

THE ISSUES ONLY RON PAUL WILL TOUCH

by Jeanette Doney (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 6 diaries, 304 comments) on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 11:29:12 AM
 


I am a founding partner of Berkana Technology Group, a consulting and technology development company. Our current focus is engine efficiency technology and renewable energy.
Austin LiuI am a founding partner of Berkana Technology Group, a consulting and technology development company. Our current focus is engine efficiency technology and renewable energy.

For your information

I see that plenty of folks have pointed out that Ron Paul has discussed these issues head on, but FYI, here are some links so you can hear it from his own mouth:

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/01042008/watch2.html 

by Austin Liu (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 2 comments) on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 11:48:26 AM
 


earth angel
Shannon Rudolphearth angel

great article!

aloha!

don't forget our fubar election system! 

by Shannon Rudolph (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 11 comments) on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 1:23:07 PM
 


retired and loving it
dave stanleyretired and loving it

The Issues The Candidates Won't Touch

all around the mulberry bush the Dumbo chased the Ass hush now hush now we all fall down


Thats my personal view of American politics the last 50 years

. The issues that Americans are fighting over are all moot.

America is already bankrupted

America is no longer free,

America is ripe for the plucking . Mr Bush circles the people waiting for the right time to strike fear in all of you.

all he needs now is a good old Economic depression , right on schedule for 2008 here it comes

Americans are so dazed they don't even know what hit them

Lincoln warned you Americans,

he told you "not in a 1000 years blah blah blah" only an enemy from within could destroy America.

The Germans circa 1941 would of been shocked at the blitz-krieg the neocons have set in motion

everything down to an economic depression

You can't save freedom if you already lost it

The North American union will steam roller America , America is slotted for

3rd world status .

Don't take my word on it , check it out yourself

by dave stanley (5 articles, 1 quicklinks, 7 diaries, 286 comments) on Wednesday, January 9, 2008 at 2:33:44 PM
 


Kevin Gosztola goes to Columbia College in Chicago where he is studying film. He hopes to become a documentary filmmaker. He is currently working as a production assistant on a documentary called "Seriously Green" which traces the development of the Green Party throughout the 2008 election. He has a passion for journalism and writes articles or press releases in his spare time. He is a Nader/Gonzalez supporter in this election but welcomes anyone who wishes to have an open discussion on why he ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Kevin GosztolaKevin Gosztola goes to Columbia College in Chicago where he is studying film. He hopes to become a documentary filmmaker. He is currently working as a production assistant on a documentary called "Seriously Green" which traces the development of the Green Party throughout the 2008 election. He has a passion for journalism and writes articles or press releases in his spare time. He is a Nader/Gonzalez supporter in this election but welcomes anyone who wishes to have an open discussion on why he ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

I think the Ron Paul people like OpEdNews

It's good to have them around except in this case they aren't helping.

While you're Republican Party may get it more than our Democratic Party does right now, do they? I mean yes Ron Paul's equal Dennis Kucinich is polling lower but does that mean your party has waken up or that voters from the Democratic Party have switched to Republican to support him in this election? 

Either way, please allow us to make our point about how the Democratic Party in particular is ignoring issues the people find important and ignoring a chance to capitalize off of taking stances. 

It's not like they would lose if they took a stand. They would kill a Republican in this election if they were truly speaking out on these issues and still got mainstream media coverage.  

by