Tags for This Article:

Congress (3280)  Impeachment (3193)  Democratic (1925)  Policy (1130)  2006 Congressional Elections (375)  Message (300)  Activism (221)  2008 Election Local Primary (58) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
November 12, 2007 at 01:29:44

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined on 11/12/07:
The THIRD Option (Systematic Primary Challenges)

by thepen     Page 1 of 3 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

What is it going to take for the majority of the American People to get the attention of Congress?

In this piece we will propose the simple, necessary, and what should have been self-evident, answer to this question. Many more people are speaking out every day, emailing and calling their members of Congress on the issues. It is not just that we need to engage even more people in political policy activism, because we need to do that anyway in any case. But our current Congresspeople have not yet made the connection between people speaking out, and the loss of their own seats when they fail to heed our voices. We need to help them make that connection on a more personal level.



Since before the last election the Democratic party has been operating from the assumption that they cannot be challenged from the progressive side. They have systematically taken their own natural supporters for granted, thinking that no matter how pathetic they proved to be in the majority, that most of us had no other choice because we would not vote for an overtly ideologically hostile member of the other party.

But we the people have a third option . . . systematic primary challenges.

Some heard what they wanted to hear, thinking that electing Democrats last time would end the occupation of Iraq. We knew better. Besides promising some deliberately vague "new direction", we know first hand that where they had a choice, in the last election cycle the Democratic party honchos systematically refused to support any candidate even implying that our troops should be quickly brought home. But whatever the so-called leaders of the Democratic party were actually up to, the American people were desperate enough for change to give them a chance. And they have blown that chance completely.

We were told before the last election that impeachment was "off the table". And some of us chose to believe that the official Democratic party position might change in the face of further revelations (which has since happened) of the manifest ongoing constitutional crimes of the Cheney White House. But what might have on first blush have been taken as altruistic deference of personal ambition has degenerated into congenital and irredeemable cowardice.

Since that last election, what have the Democrats done with their majorities in both houses of Congress? They have not delivered on a single major agenda item without surrendering on an even larger principle. For example, they could have rallied the American people in support of the minimum wage increase standing alone, but instead surrendered on hundreds of billions of additional war spending to get it. They have surrendered on things they did not have to surrender on.

And while the Republicans have filibustered at a record pace from their side, the Democrats this week couldn't even get it together to filibuster pro-torture and pro-imperial presidency Mukasey, even though they had the votes to do it. And that was without the votes of every single Democratic senator running for president, who didn't even bother to show up. It is reported that the Mukasey appointment was traded for temporary handful of talking point beans, which they will end up giving away also at the next confrontation.

Does anybody else remember these lofty words asserted in the wake of the resignation of previous attorney general Alberto Gonzales, referring to any replacement?

"The nominee must also pledge to cooperate with ongoing congressional oversight into the conduct of the White House in the politicization of federal law enforcement."

Mukasey promised no such thing. In fact, he would not even concede that the president had to follow the law. What a sad joke on the American people is the current majority leadership. They keep telling us that next week they'll finally find a backbone . . . really. The only backbone to be had will be the one provided by the people themselves, and their new and DIFFERENT representatives as the last resort required now.

Suppose there was a baseball team manager who lost every game, absolutely every one, who made nothing but bad trades. How long do you think it would take before they got sacked by the owners? We the people are the owners of our representatives in Congress. They work for us, not the other way around. And it is seriously time to start sacking them.

There is hardly a Democratic member of congress who will not admit that the Cheney White house has committed unprecedented constitutional crimes. And yet, when you challenge them as to why they will not call for impeachment, they give some lame excuse about their dereliction in not doing so. Do they seriously delude themselves into thinking that the American people will give them a bigger majority based on their abject failure to exercise the power we have already given them?

There is a live Cheney impeachment resolution before the House Judiciary committee right now, H.Res. 799 (renumbered from H.Res 333), thanks in part to the mocking arrogance of the Republicans in opposing the motion to table as a lark. But for the moment that is the perfect place for it for mobilizing purposes, for the Judiciary Committee is exactly where real articles impeachment must emerge from. The Judiciary Committee's first reaction when it was referred to them was to say they were busy with other things for the next two weeks (which things they likely aren't going to get done either).

Cheney Impeachment Action Page: http://www.usalone.com/hres333.php

Facebook Version: http://apps.facebook.com/fb_voices/action.php?qnum=pnum709

 1  |  2  |  3

 

internet activist with the mission of generating as many policy messages to Congress as possible

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments

Charlie Levenson is a writer and activist in Portland, Oregon. In addition to serving as the Manager of Electronic Communications for a social/athletic club in Portland, he instructs in Digital Media at Portland State University, consults on communications strategy, and occasionally writes/directs videos.
Charlie LCharlie Levenson is a writer and activist in Portland, Oregon. In addition to serving as the Manager of Electronic Communications for a social/athletic club in Portland, he instructs in Digital Media at Portland State University, consults on communications strategy, and occasionally writes/directs videos.

I'm ready to help...

I won't run, but I will definitely work and support anybody who wants to run in the Oregon 3rd (D-Earl Blumenauer).  Dear Earl is a long-time member of the house who keeps spewing how he want to "get a lot done" and not get bogged down in Impeachment.

I will support any progressive to run against him in the primary in 2008.  It's time to send Earl home.  He won his last seat by 80-20, so his seat is safely non-Rethuglican.

by Charlie L (2 articles, 4 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 720 comments) on Monday, November 12, 2007 at 4:52:10 PM
 


Rabid, southwestern state progressive
SouthpawRabid, southwestern state progressive

It can be done!

Witness Ned Lamont's crushing victory over Joe "The Mole" Lieberman in the Connecticut primary.  No more begging, whining, crying.  We the people say, "either do your job or get out!"

by Southpaw (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments) on Monday, November 12, 2007 at 8:35:04 PM
 


A retired Navyman who has ran for 1st. District of Tennessee as a Green with a primary plank of Impeaching Bush/Chaney and a secondary plank of listening to and serving people instead of corporations. He now has accepted the position of FOAVC Coordinater for TN. He also is a direct decendent both on his Mothers and Fathers failies of members of the Seneca Nation.
Robert N SmithA retired Navyman who has ran for 1st. District of Tennessee as a Green with a primary plank of Impeaching Bush/Chaney and a secondary plank of listening to and serving people instead of corporations. He now has accepted the position of FOAVC Coordinater for TN. He also is a direct decendent both on his Mothers and Fathers failies of members of the Seneca Nation.

I agree, and I'm doing it

I have been saying it for some time now. If you want decent government, honest representation and a voice in determining what happens that will affect you in Washington, run for office yourself. We need a new broom in politics at every level, local, state and national. It's not hard, get out and talk to people about why your running, not speeches but face to face talking in malls, shopping centers, flea markets and any where else that people congregate. Find out who agrees with your stance and ask them to have a gathering for coffee at their house so you can talk to their friends. Raise money a little here and a little their, as long as you don't sell yourself to business interests and such. If you need more help contact me at 1robertnsmith@comcast.net or carol Wolman at cwolman@mcn.org she is forming the New Broom Coalition which includes Cindy Sheehan. People who have had it with business as usual, and intend to force changes in the pigpen they call politics. Though the best government money can buy has to be wiped out at every level.

by Robert N Smith (11 articles, 0 quicklinks, 8 diaries, 121 comments) on Monday, November 12, 2007 at 9:07:50 PM
 

 

3 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

NEW IDEAS ON RESTORING U. S. ECONOMY, for the Next Secretary of Commerce, William Blaine Richardson III by Stephen Fox

Detroit vs. Wall Street: The Trillion Dollar Class War by Cameron Salisbury

Saving the Big 3 for You and Me ...a message from Michael Moore by Michael Moore

SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

Credit Card Crisis Is Here / Derivatives Next by Allen L Roland

End of the Road to Moronity by Rand Clifford

Paulson shoots another arrow into the heart of the Economy by Andrew Hughes

No Bailout Oversight: Bush Stalls Inspector General Selection by Allen L Roland

Leading lives of quiet desperation this holiday season by Sheryl Letzgus McGinnis

For the GOP, the Economic Meltdown May Have Happened Just a Wee Bit Early by Bernard Weiner

Go To Top 50 Most Popular