The THIRD Option (Systematic Primary Challenges)

SAVE AS FAVORITE

VIEW FAVORITES

By thepen (about the author) Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com Permalink

For OpEdNews: thepen - Writer

What is it going to take for the majority of the American People to get the attention of Congress?

In this piece we will propose the simple, necessary, and what should have been self-evident, answer to this question. Many more people are speaking out every day, emailing and calling their members of Congress on the issues. It is not just that we need to engage even more people in political policy activism, because we need to do that anyway in any case. But our current Congresspeople have not yet made the connection between people speaking out, and the loss of their own seats when they fail to heed our voices. We need to help them make that connection on a more personal level.

Since before the last election the Democratic party has been operating from the assumption that they cannot be challenged from the progressive side. They have systematically taken their own natural supporters for granted, thinking that no matter how pathetic they proved to be in the majority, that most of us had no other choice because we would not vote for an overtly ideologically hostile member of the other party.

But we the people have a third option . . . systematic primary challenges.

Some heard what they wanted to hear, thinking that electing Democrats last time would end the occupation of Iraq. We knew better. Besides promising some deliberately vague "new direction", we know first hand that where they had a choice, in the last election cycle the Democratic party honchos systematically refused to support any candidate even implying that our troops should be quickly brought home. But whatever the so-called leaders of the Democratic party were actually up to, the American people were desperate enough for change to give them a chance. And they have blown that chance completely.

We were told before the last election that impeachment was "off the table". And some of us chose to believe that the official Democratic party position might change in the face of further revelations (which has since happened) of the manifest ongoing constitutional crimes of the Cheney White House. But what might have on first blush have been taken as altruistic deference of personal ambition has degenerated into congenital and irredeemable cowardice.

Since that last election, what have the Democrats done with their majorities in both houses of Congress? They have not delivered on a single major agenda item without surrendering on an even larger principle. For example, they could have rallied the American people in support of the minimum wage increase standing alone, but instead surrendered on hundreds of billions of additional war spending to get it. They have surrendered on things they did not have to surrender on.

And while the Republicans have filibustered at a record pace from their side, the Democrats this week couldn't even get it together to filibuster pro-torture and pro-imperial presidency Mukasey, even though they had the votes to do it. And that was without the votes of every single Democratic senator running for president, who didn't even bother to show up. It is reported that the Mukasey appointment was traded for temporary handful of talking point beans, which they will end up giving away also at the next confrontation.

Does anybody else remember these lofty words asserted in the wake of the resignation of previous attorney general Alberto Gonzales, referring to any replacement?

"The nominee must also pledge to cooperate with ongoing congressional oversight into the conduct of the White House in the politicization of federal law enforcement."

Mukasey promised no such thing. In fact, he would not even concede that the president had to follow the law. What a sad joke on the American people is the current majority leadership. They keep telling us that next week they'll finally find a backbone . . . really. The only backbone to be had will be the one provided by the people themselves, and their new and DIFFERENT representatives as the last resort required now.

Suppose there was a baseball team manager who lost every game, absolutely every one, who made nothing but bad trades. How long do you think it would take before they got sacked by the owners? We the people are the owners of our representatives in Congress. They work for us, not the other way around. And it is seriously time to start sacking them.

There is hardly a Democratic member of congress who will not admit that the Cheney White house has committed unprecedented constitutional crimes. And yet, when you challenge them as to why they will not call for impeachment, they give some lame excuse about their dereliction in not doing so. Do they seriously delude themselves into thinking that the American people will give them a bigger majority based on their abject failure to exercise the power we have already given them?

There is a live Cheney impeachment resolution before the House Judiciary committee right now, H.Res. 799 (renumbered from H.Res 333), thanks in part to the mocking arrogance of the Republicans in opposing the motion to table as a lark. But for the moment that is the perfect place for it for mobilizing purposes, for the Judiciary Committee is exactly where real articles impeachment must emerge from. The Judiciary Committee's first reaction when it was referred to them was to say they were busy with other things for the next two weeks (which things they likely aren't going to get done either).

Cheney Impeachment Action Page: http://www.usalone.com/hres333.php

1 | 2 | 3