Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 23 (25 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   18 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

The Democratic Party's Plan To THROW The Next Couple Elections

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 4   Well Said 4   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 3/7/10


Campaign Finance Reform Legislation A Sure Loser by The Pen
Facing reality is a tough job but somebody's got to do it. And we foretell for you the events of the future NOT because we want them to happen, but to get you to act to keep them from happening. But to do that you need an action page, so here it is.

Put The Public Option Up For A Vote: http://www.peaceteam.net/action/pnum1038.php

And now we will explain why this action page is so critical. To understand the current political dynamic, first you must understand that the Democrats are PLANNING on losing the next couple election cycles. UNTIL you understand that, the events to unfold in the next couple years (unless you act to derail them) will make no sense to you.

You don't have to believe us. Just listen to the way the Democrats themselves are talking. Nancy Pelosi concedes that they will likely suffer substantial losses in the House come November, though she still will not admit that they will lose their majority in the next round. Barack Obama says doesn't "know" how his ever more determined push of the universally despised Senate health care scam will play politically. He doesn't know??? Was the loss of the eternally Democratic senate seat in Massachusetts not enough of a wake up call?

Their original plan, which we told you about no later than last September (and we can point you on OpEdNews.com to our published article at the time to prove it), was to lull the liberal/progressive base into thinking a "public option" was some kind of mumbling substitute for a single payer reform system (that would have represented REAL change), with the INTENTION of throwing even that option over the side before final passage. We saw it all coming, and we tried to warn you how important it was to keep speaking out to demand better.

For the corporate special interests controlling the whole legislative process (but only in the absence of your voices of course) this was a heads they win, tails the people lose, proposition. By getting the Democrats to squander their mandate and political capital for actual change, by getting them to meekly abandon their professed principles in favor of a bill that would benefit as a bottom line the insurance corporations only, the people en masse would justifiably conclude that the Democrats had completely betrayed them. And the Republicans, who by the tactic of enfeeblement of government in fact just empower the same ultimate corporate agenda, even as disliked as they are themselves, would be swept back into office in the next election. Net result ... reform and change discredited, hopes dashed, defeatism rules, the corporations win again, one grand circular tag team.


That was the MASTER plan. But then it hit a bump in the road in Massachusetts. For you see, Scott Brown was not SUPPOSED to win. What he was supposed to do was to stir the pot of public anger as a prelude to November, to build a record of opposition, to fire a shot across the public bow of the Democrats, but he was not supposed to actually hit anything. It was strategically premature. Because having lost their shaky super majority, depending even as it was on regressive bad cops like Nelson and Lieberman, the Democrats could then no longer just waltz the fatally compromised health care bill through with a unilateral conference committee.

What to do? What were the corporate fascists to do? Now keep in mind that the EXCUSE the Democrats had been giving all along to their own base, as to why not only single payer, but in the end even a feeble public option, had to be taken off the table, was that they could not muster a full 60 votes for that in the Senate, that they could only manage something like 53-56. But now suddenly, the only way to force this destined to be hated bill through was have the Democrats in the House bend over for the worst case Senate bill as it was, and clench their noses long enough to pull some kind of corrective reconciliation shenanigans that would only require 51 votes. "Why," the people would ask themselves, "can't we at least have a public option, since we were trying to get Congress to use reconciliation to make THAT happen all along?"

And the inescapable answer is ... that was not the plan. Suddenly people like Senator Rockefeller, who had PRETENDED to be for a public option before, dramatically reversed their position. Suddenly people like Senator Harkin, who declared himself to be at heart a "single payer guy" live on TV with Ed Shultz just the other day, would in the next breath not even ADMIT that he would support a public option IF a vote for it came up. Suddenly, people who were all for the public option when their vote did NOT count became equivocal, or against it, when they COULD possibly cast the deciding vote.

No, the plan was for the Democrats to pass a bill that would be so despised that they would be swept out of power again, that would cost them even their simple majorities. That was the PLAN. That was the plan of the corporations all along. There has never been any other plan. And that REMAINS the corporate plan with what can only be described as an obstinate and renewed determination.

Now, it would be one thing if Barack Obama and the Democratic party "leadership" were going to the wall for what the PEOPLE want. But they are not. They are bracing to go to the wall for what the corporations want. As perverse as George Bush was, at least he always had his most dedicated and delusional core base on his side when he thumbed his nose at the rest of us. The exact opposite is the case here. Barack Obama is standing in diametric opposition to his own base, and willfully so, displaying all the leadership qualities of a bull in a bull fight.

We can read from the last 25 messages function of our own action pages, just as you can. It breaks our heart to read people talking about how they worked so hard for Obama and now feel so betrayed. It breaks our heart to read independents write that they were willing to give the Democrats a chance, but will never vote for a Democrat again. It breaks our heart to read people declaring that they will never even turn out to vote again, for anyone. Because this is all nothing but surrender talk. But we fight on undeterred, even with our broken heart.

Put The Public Option Up For A Vote: http://www.peaceteam.net/action/pnum1038.php

And we tell you now, that if this health care bill is rammed through without at least a semblance of a public option in it, the one we were promised at a MINIMUM, there will be massive hemorrhaging at the polls come November. The American people are out there right now asking themselves, "Was Massachusetts not enough ... how big a 2x4 will we have to hit these mules in the head with before they finally get it?" The Republicans will not need to talk about any other issue to campaign on. They will get a total pass on a secret agenda that is, if anything, in every respect more hostile to the real public policy interests of the people whose anger they will arouse.

And if the Democrats DON'T lose their majorities in a single election, guess what? Same rallying war cry for 2012, "Got to vote out more Democrats so we can repeal the hated bill, including getting a getting a president who will sign the repeal bill." Try to tell us you don't hear it happening already. Even if the Democrats don't lose their majorities in 2010, they will be so reduced that they will not be able to accomplish anything in the next two years, not that they have been able to accomplish anything with the majorities they had, meaning nothing to run on in 2012 either. Of course the latest promise never meant to be honored is that the Democrats will fight for a public option LATER. But if they can't muster the votes to do it now, with the majorities they have now, only the most terminally gullible would believe they could do it with fewer votes in the future, even if they actually wanted to, which they do NOT!

And if there is a historic landslide in November and both houses of Congress go Republican, guess what the first bill from the new Congress will be ... repeal the health care bill. And guess what happens if Obama tries to veto it, or the Democrats try to filibuster (after passing it on 51 votes in the first place)? In short, Obama becomes an instant lame duck, the people will be hell bent on getting rid of him too, and the entire Democratic party is just a dead man walking. Either way, pushing this bill now avails nothing, since it WILL be repealed before it ever goes into meaningful effect.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

The Pen is a real person, and the founder of The People's Email Network, a resource founded in 2004 with the mission of making sending policy advocacy messages as facile and easy as possible. With this goal in mind we pioneered one click action (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Democratic Party's Plan To THROW The Next Couple Elections

They've Literally Punched A Hole Into Hell, We Need A Crash Alternative Energy Program Now, Assuming We Even Survive

A Supreme Act Of Judicial Treason Against The People Of The United States, And What We Can And Must Do About It

Obama's New "Improved" Leech Therapy

The President Can And Must Invoke 31 USC 3102 To Pay Our National Debts

Five Supreme Court Judges Do Da Corporate Takeover Hustle, And They Must Be Stopped

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 people are discussing this page, with 18 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

What a fantastic article! And it must be true; why... by Jerry Call on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 6:45:45 AM
The Democratic Dilemma or why do we see the Democr... by Tom Durham on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 7:35:46 AM
And just to add a point... All those disenchanted ... by Jeffrey Rock on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 9:50:36 AM
As Massachusetts born-and-bred, I cannot believe t... by Jill Herendeen on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:19:55 PM
It would be best if all progressivrs united, like ... by Jeffrey Rock on Monday, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:14:44 PM
I agree 100% FOR the 1st time in my life.If repugn... by crispy on Monday, Mar 8, 2010 at 6:33:20 AM
for the link and the one below. I had not been to ... by Jeffrey Rock on Monday, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:09:55 PM
I have maintained for years that the election of B... by Starbuck on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:28:09 PM
Those in overwhelmingly Democratic districts will ... by thepen on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 6:46:38 PM
They're in it for themselves. Read dunwalke.org, ... by Jill Herendeen on Monday, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:51:41 AM
... Which only makes sense, because they never wer... by B. Ross Ashley on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 4:17:49 PM
with Starbuck. What is the Democrats' purpose in d... by jdialo on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 6:42:04 PM
Not sure what the question is. Politicians are be... by Jeffrey Rock on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 9:59:00 PM
When Democrats allowed Republicans to install thei... by Richard Lee on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 8:45:03 PM
And yet, clearly it is possible to gain majorities... by thepen on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 8:53:48 PM
It matters not which of the two main parties hold ... by Jeffrey Rock on Sunday, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:06:43 PM
(3rd sentence)...of course the "gold standard" for... by Richard Lee on Monday, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:58:58 PM
Jeff is correct insaying this.Few people on this s... by crispy on Monday, Mar 8, 2010 at 6:50:16 AM