In the same way the Bush Regime continues to use outed vetted lies to explain and re-explain crimes they’ve committed, apparently they’re planning on using this short piece of footage that the French first introduced years back called something like “point out the Boeing.”
So we’ll spend this short time together demonstrating why we know that no 757, or any other airliner sized aircraft hit the Pentagon.
First on the right side of the clip, the object being referred to as the nose of the 757 traveling somewhere in the neighborhood of 0.8 mach and it’s Vne or “Velocity, Never Exceed” which is 0.86 mach, doesn’t move from frame to frame.
There is a small smoke trail many suspect is a missile, such as a cruise missile. Otherwise there is no evidence whatever of an airplane striking the pentagon.
It would take pilots of extreme skill and Herculean force to “force” the 757 from altitude into a steep right turn, and then a dive to nearly ground level, and then continue in flight skimming the ground knocking down light posts and such until colliding with the Pentagon. This did not happen.
The aircraft, traveling at this speed, would have severed the light poles as easy as snapping a toothpick, leaving half the pole standing. The poles demonstrated in all photographs do not demonstrate an impact site on the poles.
Three surveillance cameras at a gas station across the street and a Hotel and one more were quickly seized by the FBI. Why?
The clip shows a ball of flame and a short burst of smoke with no secondary fire ignitions. The water being sprayed on the building from the fire trucks is for show. There was no fire following this burst.
If an 80 ton 757 with fuel aboard had hit the pentagon, the ENTIRE BUILDING WOULD HAVE BEEN DEMOLISHED.
Further, as far as burning fuel goes, this "aircraft" would have taken its damaged tanks clean through the pentagon leaving fire and destruction as it went.
There was a 16 by 18 foot hole in the building initially. No marks of wing or empennage, or engine impact anywhere, not to mention a paucity of wreckage, bodies and etc.
The Pentagon claimed the aircraft was vaporized, which is impossible. Kerosene doesn’t burn hot enough to vaporize any form of metal used in today’s aircraft. Further, the bodies of the Pentagon employees INSIDE the pentagon were recovered.
This would serve to make a lie out of the Government story about a vaporized 757. (go figure)
The part of the Pentagon where this ALLEGED impact took place was in an area being refurbished and where the least amount of people would be. The roof of the pentagon caved in some 30 minutes later.
Prior to the cave in, windows all around the 16 by 18 foot hole remained intact. There was no evidence of fire what ever on the floors as seen after the roof caved in.
Computers, papers, and a conspicuous book on a wooden stand remained untouched by anything hot. The book looked much like an unabridged dictionary.
Mr. Bohne is a clockmaker and activist. He HATES the US Government, and without stretching the truth (reality) will do anything to dig up dirt on any of these bastards, as long as it's REAL dirt.
"the first man to raise his fists, is the first man to run out of ideas."
I've got to ask then, where's that plane? Barbara Olson was on it and many other people of notoriety. Where is it? I agree that to come in at the angle that that footage claims to show should have knocked down every pole and wire and tree, etc. in its path and that it so looks like a missle. I'm also ready to believe almost anything about these guys that you throw at me but... where the heck is that plane?
by
Becky Burgwin (5 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 5 comments)
on Wednesday, May 17, 2006 at 8:29:48 PM
Where is the airplane? That's anyone's guess. But suppose that "they" knew that it would be very difficult for even a skilled pilot to hit the ground floor of the Pentagon. But, "they" needed for the public to believe that crazed brown men did it by high jacking another 757 (rather than a US missle). If "they" are willing to kill thousands of people, it would be no big deal to fly the plane somewhere and do whatever with its occupants.
by
Ag Gnostic (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 2 comments)
on Wednesday, May 17, 2006 at 11:04:53 PM
Yours is the most plausible explanation at this point. The data suggests this also may have happened to United 93. Sorry it took me so long to answer..
tedbohne
by
tedbohne (87 articles, 103 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 119 comments)
on Sunday, August 20, 2006 at 4:46:27 PM
I always thought Jet fuel was extremely combustuble?
Unlike Kerosene,jet fuel's a super high octane grade of fuel that burned very hot and cleaner. Kerosene doesn't that's why it leaves so much soot.
by
Brenda Walters (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 59 comments)
on Thursday, May 18, 2006 at 2:54:46 AM
kerosene used to be used as lamp oil. when originally used, it left a black trail a blind man could follow. The worst of the lot was the B-52 with 8 J-57 turbojets. Kerosene, like diesel fuel is a light oil. It is for this reason, eighteen wheelers can idle an entire tank or both saddle tanks and reefer without ever shutting the engine off. Jet fuel, kerosene, is not highly flamable. Gasoline, naptha, and such are EXTREMELY flamable. Sorry i took so long to answer your question.
ted
by
tedbohne (87 articles, 103 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 119 comments)
on Sunday, August 20, 2006 at 4:44:42 PM
By the by, JP8 is kerosene with a bunch of additives to make it burn cleaner and keep it from freezing, and finally to cause it to jel up if the tanks are ruptured. Further, These jet engines of today are FAN JETS. That is the fuel air mixture is not shot into the combustion chamber with turbopumps anymore, but with that HUGE fan you can see if you look into the intake. It is somewhere around three times the height of a normal man. Further, it freewheels like your car fan when the air velocity into the intake exceeds the force created by the fan. The exaust of ONE of these engines, either Rolls Royce, GE, or Pratt&Whitney, as seen on most if not all large passenger aircraft can, with the full thrust of ONE engine pick up a passenger car and fling it through the air over a hundred feet. Finally, a man standing too close to the intake on the ground would find himself sucked into the engine and dismmembered most likely without shutting the engine down.
ted
by
tedbohne (87 articles, 103 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 119 comments)
on Sunday, August 20, 2006 at 4:54:07 PM
I Wish Bush Would Fly into the White House in his Helicopter
I think Barbara Olsen is alive somewhere, because she was in on the plot. An entire face change through plastic surgery would cover her identity. Even Ted her husband didn't seem quite upset he lost his wife. He was seen dating not long after Barbara was counted as one of the victims. So where is the plane? If it was not at the Pentagon, where did it go? I think it went to Newark, to meet flight 93 that was said to have crashed in Pennsylvania. It is less than an hour flight from Dulles to Newark. And flight 93 was delayed. The passengers from flight 77 boarded 93 in Newark and were later shot down by a military jet. The hole in the ground in Pennsylvania was a missile hole. The same question where is flight 93's wreckage? Barbara Olsen was never on the plane.
If anyone has seen the movie flight 93, we have full knowledge who directed and made the film. It is the same bunch affiliated with Fox News and more than likely part of the group who planned the attack of 911 on Americans. They are constantly bombarding the airwaves with propaganda to make us believe something other than the truth.
The Pentagon Video release shows nothing of the 757. And in all reality probably doctored by video frameshot experts.
Nothing can change my mind that Bush people planned it and did it.
It will be interesting to see the news coverage on the next airline crash in America, or for that matter in the world. There will be alot of interest in observing the after wreckage. I wish some billionaire like George Soros would donate a plane and crash it into a vacant building somewhere just to see the real results. No building implosions. Just a real crash, to put away those crooks who are peddling their lies of 911.
by
Dom Jermano (20 articles, 0 quicklinks, 40 diaries, 930 comments)
on Saturday, May 20, 2006 at 4:51:21 AM
Must Read (
Well Said (
News (
Touching (
Funny (
Supported (
Interesting (
Inspiring (
Valuable (
