Tags for This Article:

Law (1184)  God (889)  Animals (265)  Tennessee (232)  Compassion (228)  Gore Al (194)  Cruelty (74)  Performing (11) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
April 19, 2008 at 14:27:46

View Ratings | Rate It

A Challenge for Al Gore

by Suzana Megles     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

Al Gore-you are sounding needed warnings about Global Warming, but alas
I don't think you care much about the WHOLE environment. For me and
for others, a big part of that environment are the animals who are thinking,
feeling, sentient creatures like ourselves.

One writer in today's Oped asked what are we doing every day. He said he is trying to save democracy. A worthy ambition. People like myself are trying to educate people to treat all animals compassionately and humanely. They have basic needs much like our own--if not almost completely like our own, and some people are dismissing these needs because they feel it is their right as the "top of creation." Sadly, in my estimation, this only proves that with this type of arrogant thinking, we really don't belong there at all. I challenge anyone who witnesses the
mistreatment of any animal to tell me that the kind, loving God of Creation approves.

If you've never read Astrid Lindgren's account of an imagined visit of God to a pig slaughterhouse in Sweden, I think you will find interesting at least the last part of her article --"I Had a Dream the Other Night" which was published in 1987:

".....and so I led Our Lord to one of our big Swedish slaughterhouses for pigs...And then we stalked into Hell.

Our Lord was at first dazed by the stench when he regained His wits He shouted: "Stop! Stop it!" I see that these animals are suffering!"

He took in everything. He saw the multitude of terrified pigs being driven to slaughter with electric shocks, saw the speed with which they were stunned and hung up being hastily bled and then chucked into the scalding vat. There was one poor little devil who hadn't been bled quite to death because of the rush, and when he landed in the scalding water, he regained consciousness, screaming, swimming around among the corpses of his fellow pigs (and, for the matter, in their urine and feces).

........Then Our Lord came to life! "What kind of blockheads are these to whom I gave dominion over the animals?"

(Because of her compassion and caring, Astrid Lindgren achieved the enactment of the 1988 Law Protecting Farm Animals in Sweden.)

Now my challenge to Al Gore, proud former Senator from Tennessee. I HOPE THAT IF YOU FEEL THAT WHAT IS DONE TO THE BEAUTIFUL TENNESSEE WALKING HORSES IS CRUEL AND TOTALLY WITHOUT MERIT that you will use your political prowess and influence to convince your state legislature to ban the use of "The Big Lift" in training the Tennessee Walking Horses to "high step" with a great deal of pain.

Years ago I read about how cruelly these horses were treated and thought the practice had died out with the 20th Century. Not so, per the Doris Day Animal League.

In their flyer I read that in the 1940's and early 1950's the Tennesee Walking Horses provided much pleasure for the general public. THEN --the NATURAL front leg action of some of the horses when performing their natural signature gait --the running walk in the ring-- was noticed by the judges who awarded glowing tributes and accolades to the trainers and owners for this feat. Sadly, these horse owners and trainers decided they wanted more accolades and created "The Big Lick" --an extremely exaggerated high-step which produced injury to the horses. The flyer explains the procedure:

"To produce a similar gait with a less-talented horse and with less time spent on training, the use of weighted shoes or stacks, and chains around the horse's front legs came to be used. Some even file down the hoof to the quick or place tacks that penetrate the quick of the hoof and then add the weighted stacks and chains inflicting pain that causes the exaggerated or "enhanced "gait."

These poor horses, because of these harmful techniques, are not only in pain but unable to be let out of their stalls. Confined for 365 days standing in a stall - is this not cruel and unusual punishment? What is their crime? Obviously, it is only being the victims of the "top of creation" who feel that this exalted position allows them to do cruelties such as this. Well, I don't believe I'm the top of creation--only proper loving actions deserve that exalted place, but I hope that God has endowed me with a loving and compassionate heart and soul. And I don't believe that my God condones such terrible treatment such as this for the pleasure of people. Do you?

Do you Senator Gore? I hope the answer is no and that you will use your notoriety and political powers to ban this cruel treatment to Tennessee's beautiful suffering walking horses.

I don't think that the famous Lipanzer horses are subjected to any cruelty re their arwonderful high-stepping performances. Kudos to the trainers.

 

I have been concerned about animal suffering ever since I received my first puppy Peaches in 1975. She made me take a good look at the animal kingdom and I was shocked to see how badly we treat so many animals. At 77, I've been a vegan for the past 30 years and I thank God every day that I am. I am most disturbed at how little the Catholic Church and Christian churches generally give to concern re animal suffering in their ministry. I wrote to 350 bishops in 2001 and only 10-13 responded. I feel that the very least they can do is to instruct that the priests give one sermon a year on compassion to animals. I am still waiting for that sermon. I also belong to Catholic Concern for Animals - founded in England in 1929. (They are on the internet) I recently sent a sample copy of their bi-monthly publication called the ARK to the 8 Catholic bishops of Ohio. Only ONE kindly responded. Somehow we have to reach the Christian teaching magisterium. There is next to nothing re animal concerns and compassion for them. They basically believe that animals are the lesser of God's creation and that gives us the right to do anything we want to them. Way wrong. We need to change their mindsets. The animals are God's first and He expects us to treat them compassionately.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

NEW IDEAS ON RESTORING U. S. ECONOMY, for the Next Secretary of Commerce, William Blaine Richardson III by Stephen Fox

Detroit vs. Wall Street: The Trillion Dollar Class War by Cameron Salisbury

Saving the Big 3 for You and Me ...a message from Michael Moore by Michael Moore

SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

Credit Card Crisis Is Here / Derivatives Next by Allen L Roland

End of the Road to Moronity by Rand Clifford

Paulson shoots another arrow into the heart of the Economy by Andrew Hughes

No Bailout Oversight: Bush Stalls Inspector General Selection by Allen L Roland

Leading lives of quiet desperation this holiday season by Sheryl Letzgus McGinnis

For the GOP, the Economic Meltdown May Have Happened Just a Wee Bit Early by Bernard Weiner

Go To Top 50 Most Popular