As the day he departs the White House draws relentlessly closer, President Bush might be pardoned for wondering what historians will make of him and his Administration. My guess is they will not see him as an innovator so much as a man who took many of his ideas from previous rulers.
Unfortunately, most of his role models were dictators, wise guys who knew how to rationalize launching a war of aggression, torture captives, and conceal urgent truths from the public.
Like Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, Mr. Bush says "we don't torture," so apparently he doesn't consider sleep deprivation(SD)torture. Stalin knew better because his NKVD used it all the time. He called SD "the conveyor belt." Prisoners kept awake for days on end by a succession of thugs would admit to any crime. One NKVD torturer cruelly boasted to the father of an imprisoned 14-year-old boy, "Your son just confessed to writing (the Russian epic) Eugene Onegin." China's contemporary Communists, like the Bush military, also employ SD today.
The Administration denies it is torture to imprison captives for years without charging them with a crime. On this score, Hitler knew better. According to historian Piers Brendon, author of The Dark Valley, Hitler used this ugly technique at Dachau "to break the spirit of inmates."
Until the Washington Post exposed secret U.S. prisons in Europe, the Red Cross didn't know about them to inspect them. And when the Red Cross sought access to the very visible CIA compound in Kabul, the CIA turned it down. Hitler, too, opposed outside scrutiny of his jails. As Brendon noted, "Only a few foreign observers were admitted to Hitler's concentration camps and then only under the strictest conditions."
When President Bush looks in his mirror, he also sees a benevolent individual. Hitler also thought he was a pretty decent guy. "Thank God I've always avoided persecuting my enemies," Hitler said. Both leaders thought of themselves as super patriots. Hitler liked to give speeches against a backdrop of immense swastika flags. And when Bush speaks, White House image-makers believe showing just one Old Glory isn't good enough for their guy.
Speaking of image-making, Japan's World War II despots warned families whose sons were killed in China not to tell even their closest friends of their loss. And when defeated in the Battle of the Philippine Sea in 1944, Radio Tokyo called it a "victory" and played "The Battleship March." Carrying forward this dubious tradition, Bush forbids the photographs of GI coffins shipped home from Iraq.
In the Thirties, Hitler paid off alcoholic British journalists to write flattering columns about his regime. One Japanese reporter got paid for glorifying a beheading competition between two Army lieutenants who raced to see which could kill 100 Chinese men first during the Rape of Nanking.
Also in the Forties, a BBC broadcaster named George Orwell got paid for mocking Nazi reports British Bomber Command was targeting German civilians --- when it was doing precisely that. So the White House policy of bribing Iraqi journalists to color the truth is hardly original.
Bush can be compared with Winston Churchill in one important respect. No, historians probably won't call Bush a great war time leader. The comparison is a bit negative. Churchill wrote in his memoirs Bomber Command only killed 300,000 Germans when the actual figure was closer to 800,000, perhaps even a million, owing to the man-made firestorms at Dresden and other cities. The Bush White House also underplays the number of civilian deaths in Iraq, giving out figure that is just about a third of the actual one.
There's also ample precedent for President Bush lying about WMD to justify his invasion of Iraq. Stalin claimed he invaded Finland because that tiny nation posed a military threat to Leningrad. In 1939, Hitler claimed the Polish army attacked a German radio station, forcing him to invade Poland. The "Polish attackers" actually were Nazi concentration camp inmates suited up in Polish uniforms.
Will history and historians smile on George Bush? Who can say for sure? But many embittered Americans who feel they've been lied to by their President hope he'll find plenty of time to study history from a jail cell.
Sherwood Ross has worked as a publicist for Chicago; as a reporter for the Chicago Daily News and workplace columnist for Reuters. He has also been a media consultant to colleges, law schools, labor unions, and to the editors of more than 100 national magazines. A civil rights activist, he was News Director for the National Urban League, a talk show host at WOL Radio, Washington, D.C., and holds an award for "best spot news coverage" for Chicago radio stations for civil rights reporting. He is the author "Gruening of Alaska,"(Best Books)and several plays about Japan during World War II, including "Baron Jiro," and "Yamamoto's Decision," read at the National Press Club, where he is a member. His favorite quotations are from the Sermon on The Mount.
In 1550 the inventor of the torture method named Vigilia (Sleep Depravation or Sleeplessness, that is where the word 'vigilanti' comes from) the Hyppolitus of Marseiles wrote," That seemingly simple way, looking like a child play works on everyone and even the most dedicated heretics confessed to everything."
::::::::
Confessed to everything... A person would be sat on the high chair, preferably tied up and held that way straight while two 'interogation professionals' would sit on both sides and whenever the person falls asleep they shove him/her or kick him/her. They work in shifts; the person stays. They sleep, eat, drink; the person usually is not given any water. They can shout or sing or whatever. The person would shout too. That is at first. Then the person cries. Then pleads. If that is a woman, she cries and pleads longer. Then some get mad. But most 'confess to anything'. It works. 100% it works on anyone and the the 'confession' to WHATEVER is achieved. No kidding.
Well, now we are better; we perfected this. The person must be naked, preferably. To quell the pleadings and shouting we have special chambers with soft walls. The person has to to stand- that worked perfectly when Nazis did that. For women it is good to put them on their knees; they are very sensible to that. Sometimes there are innovations like dogs being kept in the same room. Sometimes the person is put back to the cell but not allowed to sleep, no matter what. And no water- that is the key. Sometimes psychotropic drugs are used. Sometimes recorded voices of the person's family being interrogated.
WORKS ON ALL OCCASIONS! CONFESSIONS TO WHATEVER THE INTERROGATORS WANT!
We wake up in the morning with Rummy authorising Vigilia. We go to SLEEP (!) when some person in the isolated box stays for several days while being tortured. We just do not want to know. NOW YOU KNOW, DAMN YOU! I WILL NOT ALLOW YOU THE LUXURY OF NOT KNOWING! IT WILL BE DONE ON YOU!
Whoever performs any kind of torture must be destroyed. Whoever authorises torture must be put to trial and jailed for life. Whoever pretends that he does not understand what he is doing must be confined to the asylum. Whoever praises torture must be confined to the asylum also.
People of America, you better know what you are dealing with. Hyppolitus and people like him lead to the Netherlands Revolution in which all of them were destroyed. We will be destroyed the same if we pretend we do not know what is done in our names. I will not allow that. See what you've done.
by
Mark Sashine (51 articles, 19 quicklinks, 244 diaries, 3453 comments)
on Friday, August 25, 2006 at 7:39:35 AM
I've been thinking about this. That this cabal studies all the tactics of Nazis and such for success. That's what's scary. You ought not to kneel at the temple of satan, even if he's the sweetest talking diety in the house. They forget the fact that Nazis were disgusting, horrible demons with no hearts, and only focus on how GOOD they were at lying and killing. One day they will swing for all this, I'm sure. Or hoping wildly.
by
Nezua (42 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 93 comments)
on Friday, August 25, 2006 at 8:53:22 AM
2 comments
How would you rate this?
You must be logged in (if signed up) to do ratings.
It's free to signup! And easy. And takes just a minute or two....
Must Read (
Well Said (
News (
Touching (
Funny (
Supported (
Interesting (
Inspiring (
Valuable (
