Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
May 13, 2008 at 08:29:54

View Ratings | Rate It

2008: The Year American Women Lost the Right to Vote

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Sandra Marcella (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Renee Jones - Writer

In August of this year, American women will have had the right to vote for exactly 88 years. It was during August of 1920 that the 19th Amendment was finally ratified, after a 72 year battle waged by suffragettes. It is with this in mind that I write today about the events of the Democratic Presidential Primary campaign and their impact on women's rights.

The campaign for the Democratic Presidential nominee began last year with a large field including an African American man and a female candidate, something that we haven't had in this country since 1872, when Victoria Woodhull, a suffragette, ran as the nominee of the Equal Rights Party. Hillary Clinton was the clear frontrunner. A lot of people, myself included, thought she would cruise to the nomination, considering her qualifications. By April of this year, though, something was very wrong.

Throughout the campaign, some members of the media managed to dredge up a brand of sexism that women my age thought had finally become politically incorrect. We watched in horror as Hillary was reviled in the press. When it seemed they couldn't question her experience, they questioned what she wore. When it seemed they couldn't question her proposed policies, they brought up that her husband had an affair. When it seemed they couldn't figure out why she was ahead, they tore her down with some of the most vile hate speech that this country has been exposed to in years, including comments such as taking her behind the barn, stereotypical "bitch" and more that I cannot even put into print. They repeatedly called for her to drop out. No one asked any of her male opponents to drop out.

By April, the contest was down to two candidates, Clinton and Obama, and Pennsylvania was about to vote in this historic race. Barack Obama had stumbled in the beginning, as he had only spent one year in Congress prior to running, without producing any earth shaking legislation. His time in the Illinois State Senate wasn't incredibly groundbreaking, either. Still, though, here he was, and it seemed that the press loved him. If he goofed, he gave a little speech, and the press all but crowned him as the next Martin Luther King, never mind that actions speak louder than words. It was almost as if they were afraid to say anything bad about him. Was it for fear of being branded a racist? Look what happened to Geraldine Ferraro for simply speaking the truth. Whatever it was, he got a huge pass. Meanwhile, his opponent was being attacked almost daily in the press. Apparently, its ok to revile a woman, but not a black man, and seemingly worse, it was ok for women to pile on as well. The Maureen Dowds and the Arianna Huffingtons of the media world were having a ball, and not one of them seemed to care what they were doing to members of their own sex.

Now, let's step back to the year 1913. Its March 3rd, and suffragette Alice Paul is leading over 8,000 women down Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington DC, on the eve of the inauguration of Woodrow Wilson, in an effort to call national attention to the fight for women's suffrage. The scene turns ugly when scores of male onlookers attack the women, first with insults and obscenities, and then with physical violence. All the while, the police stand by and watch, but do nothing to protect the women from the assaults. (Are you seeing any similarities here?) The very next day, Alice Paul and her suffragists made headlines across the nation and women's suffrage is finally a popular topic of discussion.

Now we're back in 2008, and Hillary Clinton has won PA. The very next day, the press began dabbling in a tactic called race baiting. The gist of it was this: Hillary only won PA because the white voters would not vote for a black man and were therefore racists. The facts were clear, though, for anyone who chose to avail themselves of the truth. Women and Catholics voted overwhelmingly for Hillary in PA. Yet, some members of the media, and the DNC began to throw out a subtle threat. The threat was this: If Hillary wins the nomination, the African American base in the Democratic Party will revolt. Although they are not the largest voting bloc in the Democratic Party, they wanted us to believe that if they were not happy, they would hand John McCain a win in the general election by staying home. Others took the threat a step further, hinting at riots like we saw in the 1960s.

Next came Indiana & North Carolina. In NC, Obama won by 14 points. Hillary overcame a deficit to take IN. Calls for Hillary Clinton to drop out started again, never mind that her opponent also lacked the required number of delegates to get the nod. She (the woman) should just step aside and let him have it, even though she is heavily favored in the upcoming states of West Virginia and Kentucky, and even though she has a huge base of women voters across the country. In fact, most media outlets have declared that it is over for her. But, again, no one mentions us women voters.

In all the press that has surrounded this campaign, one very large and important voting bloc in the Democratic Party has been ignored. Women. Women have come out in huge numbers to support the candidacy of Hillary Clinton. Many of us who have voted for her will choose to either vote for McCain in the general election or just stay home if she is not the nominee. Why is this not being discussed? Why are women being pushed to the back of the bus? Along with the women, they have reserved seats on the back of the bus for Latinos. Their votes are no longer important, either. To the Catholics, Jews, white men and the rest of the Democratic Party: the bus will leave without you. It appears the African American vote is the only one that carries any weight with the Democratic Party.

As I write this, West Virginia will vote today. Hints of the spin we can expect in this upcoming loss for Obama have already started to emerge. Again, it will be race. Personally, I'm done being disgusted by what this campaign has done to race relations in this country. I've moved on because what I find more upsetting is that NO ONE has brought up what I just did, that women have been shoved to the back of the bus and told that our votes are not important. Ignoring the power of the women's vote in this country is a form of voter suppression. I write this as just another woman voter. I write it because if Hillary said it, they would trash her into next week. I write it for Alice Paul and all the other suffragettes who paved the way for women like me. I write it because all the women in the upcoming primaries in WV, KY, OR, PR, SD and MT need to come out in force and exercise their right to vote in a way that stands up for all women and our right to vote and be heard in this country, because WE ARE A VOTING BLOC THAT CAN TURN AN ELECTION, and as such we deserve to be treated with respect. If we don't, 2008 will go down in history as "The Year American Women Lost the Right to Vote" in this country, and we will only have ourselves to blame.

Signed,

"Just a Woman Voter"

 

****************************************************************************

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Constitutional Rights"
Constitutional Law, Individual Rights (Examples
by Allan Ides

$43.95
Lowest New Price $25.00

Number of pages: 497
Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Law

No Constitutional Right to Be Ladies: Women and the Obligations of Citizenship
by Linda K. Kerber

$19.95
Lowest New Price $9.51

Number of pages: 432
Publisher: Hill and Wang

That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of a Constitutional Right (Independent Studies in Political Economy)
by Stephen P. Halbrook

$19.95
Lowest New Price $12.00

Number of pages: 275
Publisher: Independent Institute

Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act (Law in Context)
by Aileen Kavanagh

$60.00
Lowest New Price $45.00

Number of pages: 470
Publisher: Cambridge University Press

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
31 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

It is a sad situation I agree by Sharon Light on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 9:38:12 AM
Thanks so much for getting it! by Renee Jones on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 4:48:13 PM
Hillary Rode on Bill's Coattails by Laura Kay on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 10:42:43 AM
Insulted People That Voted for Hillary by Laura Kay on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 11:13:30 AM
What a load! by Helen on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 3:08:30 PM
WONDERFUL ARTICLE! by fou on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 5:02:21 PM
Hillory Clinton - Was she is Unacceptable by Rolland Miller on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 5:37:32 PM
Do a Little Research, Roland by Renee Jones on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 5:52:57 PM
Regarding your Comment on Research on the Iraq Resolution by Cheryl Biren on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 9:25:32 PM
Some of the Comments Here Make My Point by Renee Jones on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 5:59:34 PM
Excellent, Sandra by Conchita Vecchio on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 6:00:17 PM
EXACTLY!!!! by Renee Jones on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 6:10:35 PM
Hillary Has Lost It 'Cause She Was Wrong, Wrong, Wrong by R. Queisser on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 7:16:41 PM
Dear Sandra... by Linda Milazzo on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 7:23:08 PM
Hillary is a crook with a lousy record for women. by John Hanks on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 7:25:10 PM
I will keep my right thank you. by Mary Hodgman on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 7:27:09 PM
Funny that You Mention Healthcare by Renee Jones on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 7:57:28 PM
Alice Paul, Riots, and McCain by Cheryl Biren on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 9:47:49 PM
Re: Alice Paul, Riots & McCain by Renee Jones on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 10:23:53 PM
Congress Will Decide Health Care by Laura Kay on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 9:52:18 PM
What Is Hillary Clinton's "Experience"? by Laura Kay on Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 10:53:50 PM
Did Hillary's vote make a difference? by Eddie Bryan on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 at 3:58:55 AM
Eddie--thanks for the insightful post! by Renee Jones on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 at 1:45:03 PM
Thankyou by Alycha Green on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 at 4:51:21 PM
Alycha--thanks for your comments. by Renee Jones on Thursday, May 15, 2008 at 7:51:11 AM
The vote by Jack Harrington on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 at 6:05:45 PM
Dear Sandra by Julie Johnson on Wednesday, May 14, 2008 at 10:34:59 PM
Julie--please look at all my replies again. You are wrong. by Renee Jones on Thursday, May 15, 2008 at 8:00:38 AM
Sandra - Opinion/Conclusions Without Any Factual Support by Julie Johnson on Thursday, May 15, 2008 at 11:46:29 PM
Responses to selected comments by Tom Terrific on Monday, May 19, 2008 at 4:35:20 PM
Thanks, Tom! by Renee Jones on Thursday, May 22, 2008 at 1:56:18 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum