 |
Add to My Group
I'm Not Buying What Al Gore's Selling
By Russell 'Ace' Hoffman (about the author) Page 1 of 2 page(s)
For OpEdNews: Ace Hoffman - Writer
In two and a half hours of testimony before a near-idolizing Senate hearing, Al Gore said very little. He profusely thanked Republicans and Democrats alike, and answered every question in the same condescending drone -- even as he told the world he didn't understand "trigonometry" and "calculus" and complicated mathematical things like that.
All of a sudden, about an hour into the proceedings, he was peppered by Republicans blaming him for legislation leading to the demise of nuclear power in America, and demanding to know if he supports nuclear energy OR NOT.
Al Gore was ready.
"It's likely to be a small part. I don't think it will be a large part" he says, without defining "small" or "large."
He states the he "assumes" that we will "solve the waste problem."
He feels that we'll solve the problem of operator errors. We're not Russia so we could never make the same mistakes THEY made at Chernobyl.
He agreed with Senator Johnny Isakson (R-GA) who said Three Mile Island proved we're "GOOD" (because it didn't completely melt down and destroy Pennsylvania).
He laments that nuclear power plants "only come in large." He looks forward to the next generation of nuclear power plants, which (he feels) will solve all the problems of the previous three generations.
He's "less sure than he once was" about the usefulness of nuclear power. "So I think it will play a small role in some areas, I don't think it will be a big part" he says again.
"The waste problem may be solved" he reiterates hopefully. Senator Larry Craig (R-ID) admits "Yeah, we still have problems ... waste management..." He did not identify any other problems. Chairperson Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) told Al Gore: "I'll give you 60 seconds to respond to that speech about nuclear energy [by Senator Larry Craig]."
Gore used his minute to reiterate that he DIDN'T say nuclear power "wasn't a factor" in his proposed solution to the problem of global warming.
Numerous speakers on both sides of the aisle kept saying nukes are clean, often immediately explaining that they mean they don't release significant amounts of CO2 during operation. No one talked about fission products. No one talked about the energy-intensive "nuclear fuel cycle," let alone, the threat from terrorism at every step. No one talked about cancer. No one talked about how much water nuclear power plants use, which would conflict with other uses in a global-warming-induced global water shortage.
No one even talked about renewable energy much. Al Gore stated -- correctly, I believe -- that small-scale energy producers need to be able to sell electricity to the grid. But his main solution to the problem of global warming -- aside from "conservation" (aka "energy efficiency") and the "small" role nuclear power will play was: Clean coal.
Whatever THAT is!
1 | 2
Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Demand all nuclear power plants be shut down immediately!
Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
 Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
 View Authors' Articles |
by James Lovelock
$20.95
Lowest New Price $4.79
Number of pages: 288
Publisher: W.W. Norton
by David R. Cowan
$18.95
Lowest New Price $11.95
Number of pages: 252
Publisher: Adventures Unlimited Press
by Liz Simpson
$14.95
Lowest New Price $1.89
Number of pages: 160
Publisher: Gaia
by Serge King
$12.00
Lowest New Price $3.70
Number of pages: 243
Publisher: Quest Books
| 1 comments |
|
||||
|
||||||||||||||
Must Read (0) 
Well Said (0) 
News (0) 
Touching (0) 
Funny (0) 
Supported (0) 
Interesting (0) 
Inspiring (0) 
Valuable (0) Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2010, OpEdNews |
