Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (43 comments)

Is The SCOTUS Picking Another President?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (176 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

In this case, timing is everything.

Who does today's Scotus Decision help more, Obama or Hillary?

The SCOTUS decided who would be our president in 2000, appointing George W. Bush.

Are they again interfering in the elective process to influence who will be the Democratic candidate?

BBC reports:
"The US Supreme Court has upheld an Indiana state law requiring people to show photo identification before voting, to guard against fraud.


Many Democrats believe that the voter ID laws represent an attempt by Republicans to suppress turnout among groups - like African-Americans and the poor - which traditionally vote for the Democrats.

And civil rights activists say that there is little history of voter fraud in Indiana."
The word is that the decision on Voter ID laws in Indiana, that the right wing neanderthals in the supreme court decided on today was expected to come in June. That's when most SCOTUS decisions are reported.


This decision, an abomination against Democracy and voting rights, directly supports and serves the Republican mission to make it more difficult for or to block poor, minority and youth voters from casting their votes at the polls entirely. This was part of the plan that Gonzales and his tainted Justice Department was working on.



The decision was due ou in June, but, since the Bush and Reagan appointees have been so extra efficient, the ruling allows Indiana to use the law to make it more difficult for Democratic primary voters next week.

Who do you think it will help-- the candidate with reliably voting senior citizens or the candidate who gets support from students and blacks?

Yup. We know who the right wing wants to see running against McCain. It's pretty sad to see the SCOTUS getting its hands in the picture of presidential politics again. But not surprising. It's been said before, but I'll say it again. Reagan and Bush have damned America with this toxic batch of Judiciary horror stories for decades to come. It certainly reminds us why a McCain victory would surely doom democracy and the constitution of this great nation. It will become this "once" great nation.

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
43 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Not picking. by John Hanks on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 7:32:06 PM
Scalia has made this a particularly dangerous time. by Kevin Anthony Stoda on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:56:15 AM
Agree 100% by William Cormier on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 7:43:06 PM
Difficult to imagine, but the law used to mean something by Wayne Turner on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 7:57:43 PM
Supreme Court by August Adams on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 9:02:11 PM
Ringing in my ears.... by mikel paul on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 9:14:07 PM
What Supreme Court Justices Joke About . . . by Edward Ulysses Cate on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 9:14:47 PM
Supreme Court by Ty on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 9:28:50 PM
Get the facts straight by M. Bennett on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:01:49 PM
no by Rob Kall on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:27:15 PM
Ad Hominem attacks by M. Bennett on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:47:07 PM
Are you the Bennet by Bia Winter on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:13:26 AM
Nope by M. Bennett on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:48:40 PM
Loosing confidence in th electoral process by Ann Muir on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:18:45 PM
Good question by Rob Kall on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:30:11 PM
SCOTUS, Picking Another President by vincent passiatore on Monday, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:40:12 PM
Bad sailors by Bia Winter on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:17:12 AM
The Democrats too. by M. Bennett on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:56:39 PM
Voter Fraud BS by C.Bid on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:04:24 AM
and they will pick Clinton or McCain by shirley reese on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:24:05 AM
Look-alike word by Galen on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:34:55 AM
Please try to Refrain by fou on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:02:05 PM
Weiners for everyone by Galen on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:53:30 PM
interesting by sbaker on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 6:21:52 AM
Alternate methods??? by M. Bennett on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:10:34 PM
Supreme Court by Phil Little on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:14:58 AM
Vincent Bugliosi by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:16:05 AM
HOW HORRIBLE! by steve scheetz on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:34:19 AM
ID cards by camanokat on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:33:51 PM
there is no incidence of voter fraud by lila york on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:34:35 AM
well, none except for these instances.. and others.... by steve scheetz on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:41:39 AM
A SCOTUS Ruling I would like to see by Lord Stirling on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:58:06 AM
another decision for power & privilege, against the People by Better World Order on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:37:44 AM
Interesting the passion with which by Jim Freeman on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:12:18 AM
From a person who knows... by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:30:42 AM
Money where your mouth is by M. Bennett on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:11:55 PM
Oh, Hell by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:48:56 PM
MARK SASHINE by WML on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 5:34:49 PM
Great point - YES THEY ARE by Michael Collins on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:46:24 AM
10-15%?? by steve scheetz on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:15:20 PM
Rights are for the citizens. by steve scheetz on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:13:26 PM
Better early than late? by jblb on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:50:17 PM
HANG IN THERE! by Ross L. Gillum on Tuesday, Apr 29, 2008 at 9:08:38 PM