Tag(s): ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (91 comments)

Spitzer's Whore Should Not Make a Nickel

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (176 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

The Jersey whore who has become famous overnight has been offered enormous deals from Hustler, Penthouse, is making money from the downloads of her sluttish, normally untalented song.

Why should she get rich for breaking the law. The FBI used Spitzer's dalliances with her to break him. But there are laws against her prostitution and now she looks like she'll make a fortune off her notoriety. Aren't there laws against this?

Frankly, I oppose laws against prostitution. It is a behavior, like drug abuse, that can ruin people, but so can drinking alcohol or gambling. We have too many crimes on the books.

But since it is a crime and since this woman was used by the Bush admin FBI to bring down a Democratic leader with presidential potential, I don't want to see the woman rewarded. I want to see her receive equal justice.

Failure to give her the full attention of the law, failure to prevent her from being massively rewarded, will create a precedent for future gotcha setups by rogue government agencies that have been taken over by partisan leaderships.

I should be clear. Spitzer was an ass and a fool to do what he did to his family, his career. But that's just part of the picture.

************

Update: After reading 30+ comments, mostly disagreeing with me, here's where I lay this out a bit more, having had some more time to think about it.

The TV news had just announced that Hustler and Penthouse were in a bidding war, exceeding a million dollars. My posting above was almost a kneejerk reaction to it, certainly only partly formed. So here's a longer take on it.

I see Spitzer as a tragic hero-- one who has taken on and beaten some of the most powerful corporate tyrants and criminals, who has incurred their enmity and revenge. This girl who was a pawn has the potential to become a celebrity, a star.

No, I'm no Simon, from American Idol, though I've run a record company. But I don't want girls to think that if they're lucky, they can live in fancy NY city digs, make tens of thousands a week, become millionaires, if they become .... whores. Oh. You don't like that word, not nice enough. How about boy toys, pay for play boy bling, love kittens... whatever. She sells her body to a guy old enough to be her father-- perhaps not as despicable as a general who lies for his commander in chief, like Colin Powell, or Bush appointees who de-regulate or ignore regulations in industries where failure to regulate leads to death or environmental damage. These people are also whores. I used the word whore because it IS an ugly word, and that is what the young lady is. 

But Bill Clinton's dalliance with Monica Lewinsky led to a generation that was enamored with and fascinated with oral sex. Not necessarily a terrible thing, but clearly an unintended consequence of the mediaization and publicizing of the circumstances of Clinton's relationship with Lewinsky.

I don't want to see a new generation grow up romanticizing and glorifying the success and fame of Eliot Spitzer's whore. Already, I'm sure that the body workers who serviced the other numbers on the list on which Spitzer was number nine, are disappointed that THEY have not been so "lucky" to be THE ONE to get all the attention. I expect soon enough, other women who serviced Spitzer will come forward, trying to jump on the Penthouse, Hustler, celibrity gravy train.

I would rather the narrative be that this women was a victim, that she was used by Spitzer and the FBI and the pimps who sold her services and that she was a loser in the deal, that selling her body, her self esteem, her integrity was a losing proposition. That's the message I'd like to see become the predominant narrative that unfolds from this story.

Yes, I do agree that prostitution should not be a crime. Prostitutes should register, get checked regularly for health and there should never be circumstances where sex slaves, like today's MSNBC is exploiting for it's titillating nature, as a tie in to this Spitzer story, are abused against their will.

I don't want teenagers, glued to their TVs following the latest personal failings and crises of Brittany Spears, Paris Hilton or Lindsay Lohan, to see Miss Ashley Alexandra Dupre as a heroic, inspiring role model.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
91 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Spitzer's call girl by Ron Jacobs on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:42:21 AM
Pretty harsh by Barton Kunstler on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:44:09 AM
Political hypocrisy by Ami Isseroff on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:52:26 AM
politicians by robert braunstein on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:01:16 AM
Fitting into the "Poor Prostitue" Narrative.... by Constance Lavender on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:06:31 AM
Help? I don't understand. by jf on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:09:03 AM
Rewarding Spitzer's Lady by JGug1 on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:12:20 AM
JGug wrote: by Dana Pico on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 2:58:55 PM
RED HERRING!RED HERRING! by Guajolotl on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:14:09 AM
I am sure the IRS is going to take care of this by siriusss on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:16:00 AM
sure, but... by Barton Kunstler on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:30:46 AM
You caught me. by Rob Kall on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 1:05:00 PM
Spitzers enemies by Philip Knab on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:21:46 AM
Nickel maybe.... by Alexis Knapp on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:26:02 AM
Then there are the whores who targeted Spitzer. by John Sanchez Jr. on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:32:42 AM
You're flat out wrong, Rob by SpiritBlooms on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:35:49 AM
Monica Lewinsky got a shot at Fox by John Hanks on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:45:39 AM
Really? by RHM on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:51:06 AM
Come on Rob. Lighten Up! by Dave Lindorff on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:51:48 AM
Is your house in order? by Pam Ladds on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:06:25 AM
Prostitution by Ty on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:16:41 AM
Nickel by Archie on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:27:13 AM
Too nasty Rob. by John Haigh on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:31:51 AM
yes by Constance Lavender on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:53:32 PM
Let It Be by Stephen C. Rose on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:56:02 AM
Offensively wrong-headed. Several aspects of the Spitzer by Richard Mynick on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:00:28 PM
SPITZER AND LANGUAGE by Laura Beth on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:01:59 PM
Finding Tony Soprano by siriusss on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:16:07 PM
Rob, Rob, Rob by Cheryl Biren on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:33:50 PM
Ironic by Robert Sargent on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:35:52 PM
Surely Rob's comments are only meant to be incendiary... by Debra Craig on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:49:58 PM
Words from a past time of paranoia by Alan Donelson on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 1:03:09 PM
2nd time by Alexis Knapp on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 2:06:36 PM
You totally ROCK!! by EFKaplan on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:44:06 PM
Neither should the other whores. . . by Barbara Bellows-TerraNova on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 1:55:44 PM
unauthorized, immature, cheating, naughty sex by john riggs on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:15:16 PM
Hypocrite by James Cordray on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 1:59:21 PM
Pam Ladds nailed it... by waldopaper on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 2:13:48 PM
daughters by Cheryl Biren on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 2:49:35 PM
Your daughter by Rob Kall on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:25:12 PM
point taken by Cheryl Biren on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 4:49:22 PM
from a reader by Rob Kall on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 2:50:14 PM
Well, I'm glad to see you call a whore a whore . . . by Dana Pico on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 2:53:50 PM
reread what I said by Rob Kall on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:27:57 PM
And yet... by fou on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:55:42 PM
...and for every Dupree... by waldopaper on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:41:23 PM
Phew! by ibrahim turner on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:57:17 PM
Spitzer's Whore by Gary Denson on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 4:00:15 PM
Sheesh Rob by Lover of Truth on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 4:09:00 PM
"Whore" is a demeaning and shameful term... by Linda Milazzo on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 4:37:31 PM
You Are Damn Right Rob by aberamsay on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 4:57:12 PM
Mr Kall, I gave you more credit ... by Mr M on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:16:48 PM
Have you been reading this site? by Kenneth Barr on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:23:09 AM
Rob's Dike by Leslie Radford on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:19:06 PM
And like Hester... by waldopaper on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:39:35 PM
ramsheyi, above, by Leslie Radford on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:40:55 PM
Broke or cowards by John Hanks on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:42:46 PM
Thanks Hanks. by waldopaper on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 6:27:33 PM
On the mark by coyote on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:03:07 PM
I say..... by Michael Morris on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 5:59:27 PM
Same post in the "whore" thread by Reverend Anthony Wade on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 6:22:19 PM
I hate to open an old wound, but,,, by john riggs on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:24:50 AM
How Spitzer was caught by Bill Samuel on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 7:21:29 PM
Crying foul by Frank J. Ranelli on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 7:23:23 PM
Foul! by Leslie Radford on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:26:40 PM
exactly by Cheryl Biren on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:42:35 PM
That argument is specious by Reverend Anthony Wade on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:37:03 PM
is it possible by Cheryl Biren on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:07:17 PM
Cheryl by Reverend Anthony Wade on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:36:05 PM
your God? by Cheryl Biren on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:12:44 PM
on religion by Reverend Anthony Wade on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:51:24 PM
oops by Reverend Anthony Wade on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:53:06 PM
frank by Cheryl Biren on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:31:15 PM
Men are prostitutes too... by Constance Lavender on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:15:03 PM
Good point by Reverend Anthony Wade on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:38:40 PM
It's about words by Frank J. Ranelli on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:15:49 PM
thanks by Cheryl Biren on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:14:52 PM
No lecture, just honesty by Frank J. Ranelli on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:08:39 PM
really? by Cheryl Biren on Sunday, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:31:57 PM
Tragic Flaw by Kenneth Barr on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:21:36 AM
Personally, I think we should give up on the term "whore". by Rick Blair on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:39:58 AM
She wasn't part of the takedown. by Michael Price on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:53:09 AM
Just to let you know... by Constance Lavender on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:33:47 AM
I don't get it .... by John Danforth on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:34:49 AM
That's Irony by Keith Fisher on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:03:41 AM
I still disagree with you by Pam Ladds on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:44:12 AM
Since you asked my opinion by Bernard on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:33:48 PM
language by z on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 2:54:14 PM
Huh? by Rick Burrows on Monday, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:59:22 PM
A valid point by Dave McCallister on Friday, Mar 21, 2008 at 7:45:35 AM
AMAZING! by steve scheetz on Tuesday, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:26:11 AM