Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
12 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Time To Privatize Bridges? Or Time to protect America from Privatizers with Federal Regulations?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Become a Fan
  (276 fans)

opednews.com

One of the biggest items on the transnational corporate, globalist right wing agenda is privatization. In the third world, they aim for privatizing water, oil, energy... and if they could, they'd sell the right to air. Just imagine putting up millions of people in public housing-- privatized, of course, and offering clean, cool air from metered vents or polluted, muggy, hot, unfiltered air-- as in open windows.

So, it is no surprise that the Wall Street Journal, on it's extremist, wild and crazy editorial page, defends the idea of privatizing bridges(subscription required to read full article.) They cite a handful of examples of how mayors or governors have cut deals, usually with foreign companies, to sell rights, usually for 50-75 years, to run roads. They argue that corporations are better are projecting growth in use of the roads, or bridges or tunnels... But you have to wonder. When those urban or state bureaucrats make their lowball estimates, are they doing so with a job offer in their pocket?

If a city official estimates that growth of uitilation of a road will be one percent, and it's really three or four or five percent, then, when the government negotiates with the privatizing company, the government owned asset being negotiated could very well be "sold" in this long term lease arrangement, which usually involves a up-front incentive payment, for a tiny portion of what the asset is really worth. For example, if a stretch of toll road, currently netting, say $100 million a year is projected, but some low-paid city planner to grow one percent a year, while the reality is it will increase two, three, even five or more percent, the increased profit for the corporation and loss for the municipality or state is huge, and it goes on for a very, very long time.

Now, it is very likely that this kind of privatization WILL continue to develop, though I oppose it. If it is going to happen, there should be some caveats.

1-Estimates of growth and revenues should be at least triple sourced from independent experts.

2- re-assessment of growth rates of utilization. If profits are much higher, then a percentage of the profits go to the government, or the lease is shortened proportionately.

3- Just as bidding on government jobs requires multiple bidders, bidding for these long term privatization leases should absolutely be required. And there should be no rush- at least a one year notice. . These are very long term leases.

4- There should be a federal law that prohibits government employees, including legislators, mayors, governors, etc. from taking employment or consultant work, directly or through third or fourth party organizations associated with any privatization project they even look at while receiving a government paycheck. Since the monetary rewards can potentially be enormous, punishment for violation should not be fines, it should be time in jail.

It is very difficult to reverse privatization. When leaders attempt it, they are villified as communists, socialists, revolutionaries or criminals. Yet, so often, privatization IS criminal-- theft, fraud, blackmail, even involving or supporting murder, slavery, causes of unnecessary deaths and more. It's better to get this kind of thing right the first time.

Ideally, getting it right means funding government properly to take care of infrastructure. But if weak, invertebrate or corrupt leaders are going to sell off the American commons, we should at least set up rules that minimize the exploitation of the privatizers.

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and website architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), and publisher of Storycon.org, President of Futurehealth, Inc, and an inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

Listen to over 200 of Rob's Podcast interviews here.

Rob is, with Opednews.com the first media winner of the Pillar Award for supporting Whistleblowers and the first amendment.


With his experience as architect and founder of a technorati top 100 blog, he is also a new media / social media consultant and trainer for corporations, non-profits, entrepreneurs and authors.

Rob is a frequent Speaker on the bottom-up revolution, politics, The art, science and power of story, heroes and the hero's journey and Positive Psychology. He is a campaign consultant specializing in tapping the power of stories for issue positioning, stump speeches and debates, and optimizing tapping the power of new media. Watch me speaking on Bottom up economics at the Occupy G8 Economic Summit, here.

See more Rob Kall articles here and, older ones, here.

To learn more about Rob and OpEdNews.com, check out A Voice For Truth - ROB KALL | OM Times Magazine and this article. For Rob's work in non-political realms mostly before 2000, see his C.V..

And here's a one hour radio interview where I was a guest- on Envision This, on 10/23/13. And here is the transcript. 

And Rob's quotes are here.

To watch me on youtube, having a lively conversation with John Conyers, former Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click here Now, wouldn't you like to see me on the political news shows, representing progressives. If so, tell your favorite shows to bring me on and refer them to this youtube video.

Rob's radio show, The Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, runs 9-10 PM EST Wednesday evenings, on AM 1360, WNJC and is archived at www.opednews.com/podcasts Or listen to it streaming, live at www.wnjc1360.com

Rob also hosted a health/mind/body/heart/spirit radio show-- the Rob Kall Futurehealth radio show. Check out podcasts from it at futurehealth.org/podcasts

Follow me on Twitter

A few declarations.

-My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.

Press coverage in the Wall Street Journal: Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table


Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Libertarian Legacy? Ron Paul's Campaign Manager, 49, Dies Uninsured, Of Pneumonia, Leaving family $400,000 Debt

Interview: McCain Fellow Hanoi Hilton POW & Naval Academy Dorm-mate; Why He Won't Vote For McCain

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The bridge that fell down was not privatized.Mayor... by Steve Consilvio on Monday, Aug 6, 2007 at 12:42:38 PM
I don't like mowing the lawn, I do a lousy job... by Co6aka on Monday, Aug 6, 2007 at 1:22:45 PM
Recognizing that privatization will probably proce... by Rob Kall on Monday, Aug 6, 2007 at 2:40:46 PM
Rob, What you are saying is that the way to watch ... by Steve Consilvio on Monday, Aug 6, 2007 at 10:23:29 PM
    The point to all this is that t... by chariotdrvr14 on Tuesday, Aug 7, 2007 at 8:27:48 AM
We have already seen the ugly hand of privitizatio... by ladybroadoak on Tuesday, Aug 7, 2007 at 10:37:07 AM
"...and if they could, they'd sell the ri... by Co6aka on Monday, Aug 6, 2007 at 1:03:03 PM
I'd like to know the answers to those also!Whe... by MysticGem on Monday, Aug 6, 2007 at 4:19:07 PM
This is why no one in the world should support Pri... by MysticGem on Monday, Aug 6, 2007 at 4:23:35 PM
What you are saying is that if something costs mor... by Steve Consilvio on Monday, Aug 6, 2007 at 10:33:51 PM
Formerly in Ohio, Liquor was sold by "State Stores... by Matthew Peters on Tuesday, Aug 7, 2007 at 6:12:19 AM
usually i respect what you write but boy have you ... by liberalsrock on Tuesday, Aug 7, 2007 at 8:22:51 AM