Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (12 comments)

Fractal Politics: Local Marching or Marchturbating; Dems Legislating to stop the war or Jerking us Around.

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (193 fans)   -- Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

Yesterday, the local peace coalitions put together a "Peace Demonstration and March."
I have begun participating in one of the coalitions-- the one nearest my town-- and have grown to really respect the leader.

I arrived at the stated 2:00 start time for the march, discovering that the marchers were inside the church meeting place. Looking now at the email notice, it did say "There will be speakers before and after the March."

It ends up, the volunteer who was providing the sound system had a family emergency, and they ran half an hour late getting a last minute sound system up and running. Then, the antithesis of an inspiring, energizing, rousing woman started running a disastrous run of "performers." It started off with a very elderly woman who did a poetry reading. It was followed by a local guitar player singer, then another poet, then... the poets and players and speakers droned on and on.

By 3:15, some of the activist friends I'd met up with there and I were getting antsy. We'd come to march, not listen to a poetry slam. We stepped outside. People were starting to leave. This march was floundering. We went inside, only to overhear some of the leaders discussing the fact that a priest at the Catholic Church, St. Martin of Tours, in New Hope, PA, had thrown out the group setting up the audio for the end of the march. Apparently, arrangements had been made with the pastor, and this junior priest hadn't gotten word and was taking the cowardly, cover his ass way out.

Apparently, two people decided that the 360+ marchers would sit to listen to all the people who were scheduled to speak, read poetry and play the guitar after the march-- even the marchers who hadn't planned on staying and listening.

Meanwhile, the day was slipping away, and more people were leaving.



The 2:00 start had dragged on for an hour and a half. And they were just getting started with the "post-march" "entertainment."

Now, my activist friends and I got to know each other when we were participating in "run against Bush" back in summer 2004. Our whole purpose was to get local pedestrians, passers-by, drivers to be aware that there were a lot of us opposing Bush. Every Tuesday evening, as many as 100 would walk several miles of the streets of the county seat. We knew that the goal is visibility-- to get people's attention.

And here we were, participating in another group's activity, feeling frustrated. But this was happening on a day when vigils and actions were taking place all over the country. Another friend had asked me to participate in a vigil that same day and I had encouraged him to join the march.

The decision by the leaders who were making calling the shots in the church seemed very wrong to us. We asked how much longer the "show" would go on and were told about half an hour. We went upstairs to see a woman reading page after page of lecture-- saying things about Iraq that every activist in the audience already knew. I've learned that she had a five minute allotted time. But she stretched it into 15-20 minutes. As a conference organizer, I believe that people who go over their time limit are extremely disrespectful of both the people who are supposed to follow them and the audience. It may be weak or non-existent self awareness and self regulation, or it may be selfish ego driven ignoring of the terms the speaker agreed to. But it was clear that this was not going to be 30 minutes. There at least five speakers, guitarists, poets... and it takes time for set-up, between "acts."

So Rich and I approached one of the two leaders. We suggested to her that this was a bad idea. She explained she was keeping things going in consideration for the people who were supposed to do their thing after the march, since the church was no longer available.

I said the march was not about the needs of a few guitarists, poets and speakers. She said they'd be done in 30 minutes. The women who was already on overtime kept droning on, reading her talk. (I hate it when speakers read a talk. They're not even speakers-- they're readers and have no place at a rally. Even Jesse Jackson uses notes for his talks, but he gives an impassioned speech, doesn't read and read and read.)

I suggested to this woman running things that we the people should be deciding whether we should be marching or sitting for another 30-60 minutes. We're doing it as fast as we can, she replied. The "reader" at the podium droned on, minutes ticking by like hours.

Keep in mind, we had a very nasty snow on Friday, the weather was very cold and, luckily, we had some brigh sunlight. But it was approaching 4:00 and the plan was for us to March across a bridge over the delaware river. Windy!.

Rich and I went to the back of the church, having made no headway. We went outside, and there was a crowd of people, milling, all frustrated, more leaving. We went back in to see what would happen when the "reader" finished. She was getting the next speaker up at the podium. Suddenly, someone out in the hall behind the main church area called out, loudly, "March." That broke the ice and Rich and I started talking/shouting... "we're here to march, not sit." The MC running things informed the audience that they would watch the rest of the people who were supposed to go on after the march and then leave. I said, "let we-the-people decide."

A few dozen people got up and started leaving, while the next speaker was preparing.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

With his experience as architect and founder of a technorati top 100 blog, he is also a new media / social media consultant and trainer for corporations, non-profits, entrepreneurs and authors.

Rob is a frequent Speaker on the bottom up revolution, politics, The art, science and power of story, heroes and the hero's journey, Positive Psychology, Stress, Biofeedback and a wide range of subjects. He is a campaign consultant specializing in tapping the power of stories for issue positioning, stump speeches and debates, and optimizing tapping the power of new media. He recently retired as organizer of several conferences, including StoryCon, the Summit Meeting on the Art, Science and Application of Story and The Winter Brain Meeting on neurofeedback, biofeedback, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology. See more of his articles here and, older ones, here.

To learn more about me and OpEdNews.com, check out A Voice For Truth - ROB KALL | OM Times Magazine and this article.

And there are Rob's quotes, here.

To Watch me on youtube, having a lively conversation with John Conyers, Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click here Now, wouldn't you like to see me on the political news shows, representing progressives. If so, tell your favorite shows to bring me on and refer them to this youtube video

My radio show, The Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, runs 9-10 PM EST Wednesday evenings, on AM 1360, WNJC and is archived at www.opednews.com/podcasts Or listen to it streaming, live at www.wnjc1360.com

Rob also host a health/mind/body/heart/spirit radio show-- the Rob Kall Futurehealth radio show. Check out podcasts from it at futurehealth.org/podcasts

Follow me on Twitter

A few declarations.
-While I'm registered as a Democrat, I consider myself to be a dynamic critic of the Democratic party, just as, well, not quite as much, but almost as much as I am a critic of republicans.

-My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.

Recent press coverage in the Wall Street Journal: Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

War Culture by "Hoss" David P. on Monday, Mar 19, 2007 at 1:00:25 PM
Maybe the organizers are infiltraitors? by Lorring II on Monday, Mar 19, 2007 at 2:40:10 PM
A new approach to "marches," "rallies," and "events" by Charlie L on Monday, Mar 19, 2007 at 2:55:52 PM
re-thinking march functions and planning by Rob Kall on Monday, Mar 19, 2007 at 3:14:09 PM
Very important to march - we need to be organized by Aimee on Monday, Mar 19, 2007 at 3:18:04 PM
A crisis of leadership by ardee D. on Monday, Mar 19, 2007 at 4:43:30 PM
leadership by Blue Pilgrim on Monday, Mar 19, 2007 at 8:46:36 PM
great comment by Rob Kall on Monday, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:15:08 PM
Mr Kall, AMEN! by Toby Touby on Monday, Mar 19, 2007 at 9:08:56 PM
Tonights Vigil in Burbank by Mitch LaRoche on Tuesday, Mar 20, 2007 at 12:36:41 AM
Interesting title... by Pappy on Tuesday, Mar 20, 2007 at 1:01:37 AM
chaos theory by Rob Kall on Tuesday, Mar 20, 2007 at 6:48:40 AM