Tags for This Article:

Democracy (1706)  Obama-Barack (1692)  Democratic (1632)  History (727)  Iowa (182)  Caucus (139)  Richardson Bill (58)  Clinton (20)  Edwards (20)  Richardson Bill (18) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
January 7, 2008 at 06:31:43

How Obama and Richardson Cheated in the Iowa Caucuses

by Rev. Robert Vinciguerra     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

Obama and Richardson Cheated in Iowa

History has already been made. Illinois Senator Barack Obama won the Iowa Caucuses. New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson placed fourth. But did they really earn their finishing positions? The answer may be surprising.

In the now past ABC New Hampshire debate before the January 8th first-in-the-nation primary, the rules were that only the candidates who finish in the top four slots in Iowa could participate, meaning that second-tier candidates who placed fourth could live on to continue their campaign another day.

The Pact

In the last hours before the Iowa caucuses Obama, who wanted to pad his victory and hedge his bets, approached Joe Biden with this proposal:

In precincts where Biden had a local official loyal to him, and if Biden wasn't viable, then Senator Biden would tell his organizers to move his supporters over to Obama en mass. Conversely, in precincts where Obama had more than enough supporters, he would lend people to Biden to ensure Biden a fourth place finish so that he could continue on.

Joe Biden actually considered the proposal. An anonymous source close to Biden told the Washington Post that the strategy could be "viability for victory."

When the media found out, Obama's camp admitted that the conversation took place. Biden, who when asked about the proposal at a campaign event said that the deal could "probably" help both campaigns; however he later rejected the deal on "moral grounds," a source in Biden's Iowa organization told the Rev. Rob Times on condition of anonymity.

History recorded that Joe Biden placed fifth in Iowa, and subsequently dropped out of the race.

On January 4, the day after the caucus, the New York Times reported strong rumors that Obama made the same deal to Bill Richardson that he previously offered to Biden, only this time the deal was accepted.

The Times article describes not only the rumors, but gives an eye-witness account and confession of an Obama official telling Richardson supporters that a pact had indeed been made between the two candidates.

"That's what the leadership has said," admitted Deb Copeland, an Obama volunteer as reported by the New York Times. "What we're concerned about is we heard of a few people going to Hillary. And we want to keep you together," she told the Richardson supporters at the 64th precinct.

Volunteers for the Biden campaign told the Rev. Rob Times that Obama organizers used the same speech about a "pact" to lure supporters in at least two precincts where Biden was only a few supporters shy of viability.

Representatives from both the Obama and Richardson campaigns deny that such a deal was ever struck, yet first hand testimonies clearly paint a far different picture.

The Effect

In the end, the effect of backdoor wheeling and dealing between campaigns is that Richardson's fourth place finish could be artificial, and Obama's victory margin is larger than it would have been in a democratic system.

Our democracy is based, in part, on the concept of "one man, one vote," and a vote by a secret ballot, free from the judging eyes of neighbors and the media, free from bribery, and free from the influence of political activists.

Had the Iowa contest been based on a ballot, and had caucus voters cast a single vote for the candidate of their choice as is the most fair method of picking a president, then Obama may have come in second and Richardson in fifth.

 1  |  2

 

www,revrob.com

Founder of "The Rev. Rob Times," (www.revrob.com) Rev. Robert A. Vinciguerra has been a longtime student of journalism. Currently, he holds a government job where is a technical writer, instructional designer, and an IT trainer. From Phoenix, Arizona.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments

Steven Leser specializes in Politics, Science & Health, and Entertainment topics. He has held positions within the Democratic Party including District Chair and Public Relations Chair within county organizations.

Steven Leser writes for www.opednews.com, an internet only media site that has grown to become one of the highest traffic news sites in America, reaching more traffic, according to alexa.com, than all but the thirty largest daily newspapers in the US. Mr. Leser is one of t...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Steven LeserSteven Leser specializes in Politics, Science & Health, and Entertainment topics. He has held positions within the Democratic Party including District Chair and Public Relations Chair within county organizations.

Steven Leser writes for www.opednews.com, an internet only media site that has grown to become one of the highest traffic news sites in America, reaching more traffic, according to alexa.com, than all but the thirty largest daily newspapers in the US. Mr. Leser is one of t...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Believe me, I would like to think Edwards really won, or did

significantly better, but, this is not an indication of that.

One of the things progressives are generally for is IRV, Instant Runoff Voting. Deals between candidates are rampant in voting schemes where IRV is part of the process. Often, it makes sense and is not in any way evil.

For instance, an election with 8 candidates where the two most progressive candidates ask their supporters to list the other as their number two choice.

The Iowa caucuses are not exactly IRV, but it is essentially a process that involves runoff voting. I'm not sure how much I can feel bad about it. It IS ultimately a more democratic form of voting, at least conceptually. 

by Steven Leser (189 articles, 35 quicklinks, 32 diaries, 1291 comments) on Monday, January 7, 2008 at 10:36:16 AM
 


I am a homeopath. I have a doctorate in Naturopathic medicine, with a dissertation on spina bifida; preventive, and maintenance protocols that do not discount mainstream medical practices. I believe that when all is said and done the karma we send will be the karma that comes back to us. Jesus said love your enemies. What a tough mandate. Voltaire said information is light. I think that blurred and sweeping perceptions are why we need to talk together. Thanks for the love and light brought t...

to see more of bio, click on member name

karmacounselorI am a homeopath. I have a doctorate in Naturopathic medicine, with a dissertation on spina bifida; preventive, and maintenance protocols that do not discount mainstream medical practices. I believe that when all is said and done the karma we send will be the karma that comes back to us. Jesus said love your enemies. What a tough mandate. Voltaire said information is light. I think that blurred and sweeping perceptions are why we need to talk together. Thanks for the love and light brought t...

to see more of bio, click on member name

the caucus from a personal point of view

In my caucus, because there were twice as many people as expected, the room was too small, there was no mike system, and the count was wrong while the main caucusing happened.  We were a strong Biden group.  (I had asked the Biden rep in our area what Biden wanted us to do if we weren't viable...did he have a favorite for us to go to, but he said, no, it is everyone's own second choice.)  So there we were, and needed 4 people so two Richardson people came to our group, and then we coerced my Mom and aother lady away from the large Obama group.  At that point we would have been viable.  People started leaving, when suddenly they said the number of the total was wrong.  That meant we suddenly needed nine more people for a 15% viability count.  We coudn't get 9 more; people were hot, restless, felt done, squished, uncomfortable, etc.  We were then told that our Biden group needed to disperse to other groups.  (There were no Dodd, Rishardson or Gravel groups).  So Obama came out with 4 delegates, Edwards 3, and Hillary 2.  (for a later des moines thing that i don't understand)

If Obama had tried to help Biden it was not evident with us, nor with the Richardson group.

The democrat process that we witnessed was messy, chaotic, nuts, fun and in the end unsettling, because visually and auditorially, there were no checks and balances to verify even if by mistake the bystanders (who have a right to observe) were counted in the higher counts. 

In the end, it is a pity and a shame that for one percentage point less, Biden is out.  As a tool screecher, I wouldn't run a classroom like that.  For Richardson to sit at the table in NewHampshire, well, for any of them, to not argue that why not 5 instead of four...especially when Biden in fact did earn delegates during the caucuses, (unlike Dodd and Gravel). (Kucinich flat out told people to caucus for Obama in his name). 

So, it was a slice of life....but changes are due for the next one.  (Don't forget that thousands upon thousands of Iowans couldn't caucus, because The Gov didn't have the chutzpah to declare a state holiday to equalize the returns for the second shift workers who can't caucus). 

by karmacounselor (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 50 comments) on Monday, January 7, 2008 at 6:43:16 PM
 


Cam Salisbury is a biostatistician, epidemiologist and grant writer living in Jacksonville. For more camsalis go to: www.opedinfo.com
Cameron SalisburyCam Salisbury is a biostatistician, epidemiologist and grant writer living in Jacksonville. For more camsalis go to: www.opedinfo.com

It gets worse.

Dennis Kucinich told Tim Russert on Meet the Press last Sunday that he made the same bargain.  His hope, he implied, was to impede the strongest candidate so that his own showing would be better in later primaries.  Which other lower tier candidates threw their support to Obama in the same type bargain? It's enough to make you wonder if Obama really did win.  It's enough to make you think that we've been deprived of the most ethical candidate, Joe Biden.

by Cameron Salisbury (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 15 comments) on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 at 1:08:38 PM
 

 

4 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

"Welcome, Rich White Oligarchs!" --Daily Show Billboard Greets Republicans In Minnesota Posted by Rob Kall

Why I Won't Vote for John McCain by Phillip Butler

Carville is a Spy for Bush Posted by Josh Mitteldorf

Virgo New Moon, August 30, 2008 by C.L. Pagano

Howard Zinn's Advice to Obama by Rob Kall

McCrash: McCain's Military Record Revisited by Hill Kemp

The Slow Death of Democracy and the Rise of the Corporate Hydra by Siv O'Neall

Got a Traffic Ticket in the Mail for a Right on Red at an Automated Enforcement Light? by Tumerica

The Rise and Fall of the US Dollar as the The World Reserve by John Little

"Now, This!" by Stephen Pizzo

Popularity Navigation
Control Panel:

Select Time
6 hrs 12 hrs
1 Day 2 Days
3 Days 1 Week
2 Weeks 1 Month
2 Months 3 Months
6 Months Last Year
Select Content
Articles Diaries
Polls Events
All Op-Eds
News Life/Arts/Science
Select Popularity
Page Views
# of Comments
Recommend Emails
  

Go To Top 50 Most Popular