OpEdNews Op Eds

Political Realism vs Negotiating with Our Hands

By       Message Rady Ananda     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 9 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 2795
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
- Advertisement -

Successful tactics from around the globe inspire adoption into the hand-count elections movement. Rejection of hopeless “realism” – that politicians aren’t considering our demand for hand counts - is but a part of the overall strategy. If citizens expect accurate election results, they must run parallel polls, observe, investigate and video the vote. Power is never given; it must be asserted.

 “The right of voting for representatives is the primary right by which all other rights are protected.”

So said Tom Paine at the height of the Enlightenment. A century later, New York case law reveals judicial comprehension that:

“Statutory regulations are enacted to secure freedom of choice and to prevent fraud, and not by technical obstructions to make the right of voting insecure and difficult.”

PEOPLE v. WOOD (NY Court of Appeals 1895) 148 N.Y. 142, 42 N.E. 536

Former UN Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick explains that:

 "Democratic elections are not merely symbolic....They are competitive, periodic, inclusive, (and) definitive …”

- Advertisement -

It’s probably safe to say that all election integrity advocates agree with these premises. Where we differ is in how to achieve our mutual goals. 

Realists 

Some would have us adopt the “reality” that the machines are here to stay, so let’s work within the system.  “Realists” would have us discussing audits, as if that ever overturned election results.  We know that courts have election officials’ backs, as numerous recent cases reveal (Florida 13, San Diego 50, and that squirrelly Squire case in Franklin County, Ohio, to name a few). 

Let’s talk about audits of scientifically-condemned computerized election systems for a moment.  My lay-person’s read of the literature evokes this analogy:   

The security firm, let's call it Black Wellwater, advises you to remove the back wall to your house, and replace it with screening.  After you return from vacation, the firm advises you can only inventory 10% of your goods to see if anything was stolen.  Not only that, but you can’t even choose to inventory those suspect items – things you just know a thief would go for. 

- Advertisement -

Yet this is what election officials want us to accept.  Random audits should be a part of any audit system; and targeted audits must also be permitted so that precincts with questionable results - something parallel polling may reveal - can also be scrutinized.  Some jurisdictions seek to legally forbid targeted audits.

Even worse, some states only audit 1% of the results.  In fact, San Diego County sued its Secretary of State, whining that anything more was too cumbersome for her staff.  Registrar of Voters, Deborah Seiler, used to sell Diebold election systems.  On her staff is disgraced Cuyahoga County election official, Michael Vu, who oversaw the theft or loss of thousands of dollars in memory cards and voting machines in the May 2006 election. Yeah, I bet they don’t want a stringent audit. 

The beauty of hand-counts is that a self-auditing procedure is built into the count process.  Oh sure, anyone is welcome to recount – but any recount worth its effort will use the same self-auditing techniques during the process.   

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

In 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Initially focused on elections, she investigated the 2004 Ohio election, organizing, training and leading several forays into counties to photograph the 2004 ballots. She officially served at three recounts, including the 2004 recount. She also organized and led the team that audited Franklin County Ohio's 2006 election, proving the number of voter signatures did not match official results. Her work appears in three books.

Her blogs also address religious, gender, sexual and racial equality, as well as environmental issues; and are sprinkled with book and film reviews on various topics. She spent most of her working life as a researcher or investigator for private lawyers, and five years as an editor.

She graduated from The Ohio State University's School of Agriculture in December 2003 with a B.S. in Natural Resources.

All material offered here is the property of Rady Ananda, copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009. Permission is granted to repost, with proper attribution including the original link.

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." Tell the truth anyway.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Anne Kilkenny Full Email on Sarah Palin

Zeitgeist Addendum: Steps toward a sustainable future

Kevorkian: The Right to Die and Other 9th Amendment Freedoms

Afghan Women Protest Marital Rape Law; Men Spit and Stone Them

The new weapons of genetic engineering