Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
April 13, 2007 at 16:35:43

View Ratings | Rate It

Cuyahoga County Ohio Elections Official Condones Felony Presidential Recount Rigging

by Paul Lehto     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

Cuyahoga County Ohio elections official Michael Vu Just Hired on in San Diego, California 
(& Comparing voter fraud with election fraud)
Given that presidential elections, at least, involve the question of control of trillions of federal dollars, the world's sole military superpower, and the world's richest country -- the United States of America -- I am unable to blind myself to the fact that there could hardly be any higher material incentive to cheat in elections than this.
While it remains absurd to believe that illegal voting (which normally nets one lousy vote) is worth a potential 5 or more year felony sentence for "voter fraud", it is infinitely more believable that those motivated by the above highest stakes in the world would contact insiders in elections or become insiders in elections who can deliver the only result that counts:  the election result. 
The whole DOJ "voter fraud" investigation thing is an exercise in misdirection, finding "no organized effort" to skew elections, but focusing only on the risks coming from outsiders (citizens).   
How many people know that two elections officials in Ohio were recently convicted on felony counts for rigging the 2004 presidential recount?  They were sentenced not to 5 years but to 18 months for rigging the entire election recount to come out OK.   As shown in this case, conflicts of interest for elections officials abound and include the desire to protect their reputation (having signed off on the first count) and the desire to avoid working, especially through Thanksgiving (the two proven motives in Cuyahoga County, OH).   That's a Democratic county that could not be trusted to recount Democratic votes that could only benefit the Democrat, Kerry.   CYA trumps partisanship, big time. 
Now elections official Michael Vu, (formerly head in Cuyahoga County) has just been hired on by San Diego County.  After two felony convictions, and the removal of his entire elections board by the Ohio Secretary of State on grounds of malfeasance generally, this elections official insider has this to say about the two convicted election-rigging felons from our 2004 presidential election:  " Vu defended the workers, saying they had followed longtime procedures and done nothing wrong."   http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2007/04/12/news/sandiego/5_02_564_11_07.txt  
These were not "workers" they were officials, and the judge who presided specifically said he believes there was a conspiracy that went further.   Unlike robbing a bank, where one does not get to be a bank official or set future bank vault security policy, after successfully stealing an election, one does or can get to be an elections official or gets to set future elections "security" policy.  In these security policies, none give substantial attention to or identifies the obvious fact that insiders, i.e. elections officials, are the #1 risk.   Even a private attorney would have to disclose such conflicts to their clients in writing.   But it's hard to get this reality into news coverage.
Is it too much to expect all of us, even the media, to be watchdogs, sentinels or defenders of representative democracy? At least a minority of them? Any such sentinel has to be able to be clear-eyed about all of the risks, and has to investigate all such risks even if "it's probably nothing, just the cat...".  
Instead, officials who preside over felonious presidential recounts and forced from office, defend the felons instead of democracy and are called "battle tested" and then pitied for having to suffer so much scrutiny in a battleground state, according to outgoing Registrar Mikel Haas quoted in the North County Times (link above).   
If you look into the Ohio convictions, these mid-level officials spent two entire days rigging the presidential recount so that it would come out OK.  Vu denies knowledge, said they "followed longtime procedures and [did] nothing wrong."   Are elections officials even exempt from even recognizing the force of criminal convictions? 
I will be looking with great curiosity to see which citizens, bloggers and others pick up this mainstream media story in the San Diego area, and its connection to Ohio 2004, and the overriding importance of defending democracy from insiders even more than from outsiders.  Everyone votes, so everyone takes sides in elections and ultimately nobody can be trusted.  Checks and balances are a form of institutionalized distrust.  Trust in results can only be achieved by lots of public eyeballs on the process, which in turn can only be achieved when the public oversight eliminated by computerized electronic voting is fully restored.

Paul Lehto
Attorney at Law
lehtolawyer@gmail.com
OK to forward or blog this email with all attribution

 

Paul Lehto practiced law in Washington State for 12 years in business law and consumer fraud, including most recently several years in election law, and is now a clean elections advocate. His forthcoming book is tentatively titled DEFENDING (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for " 2004 Election California"
California 2004 Statutes Election Code
by Placer Group

$19.95
Lowest New Price $9.99

Number of pages:
Publisher: Placer Group

California Elections Code 2004

$19.99

Number of pages:
Publisher: DFM Associates

Fate of universal health measure in California hinges on absentee ballots.(Election 2004): An article from: National Underwriter Life
by Allison Bell

$5.95

Number of pages: 3
Publisher: The National Underwriter Company

Plurality of Democrats would prefer someone other than Gore to be their 2004 presidential nominee: Bush leads Gore by seven points in 2004 election match-up in California (The Field poll)
by Mark DiCamillo


Number of pages: 5
Publisher: Field Institute

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments


Just wrong...

...this is just wrong. 

by Amanda Lang (23 articles, 14528 quicklinks, 442 diaries, 731 comments [17 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Apr 13, 2007 at 5:16:54 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Election Integrity, Nothings Changed

As a long-time election integrity activist who has taken a hiatus in the last few months, I am dismayed and disgusted that the progress toward election transparency and integrity is negligible.  The preponderance of the evidence that elections in 2000, 2002, and 2004 were manipulated, compromised, and out right stolen is as compelling as that for climate change through the accumulation of greenhouse gases for which data shows exponential growth from the beginning of the industrial revolution.  Yet, just as there are deniers of the overwhelming scientific evidence for climate change that former Vice-President Al Gore has so eloquently defined in “An Inconvenient Truth” and from numerous presentations and testimony before Congress, deniers at every level of government and the activist community continue to prevent the next election from being free from thieves and traitors.

 

The Holt Bill, H.R. 811, is a prevarication of election integrity because it is devoid of fundamental corrections to elections, i.e., it allows for (even increases) the use of touchscreen DRE election machines and does not mandate durable paper ballots that are optically scanned as a minimum.  Passing H.R. 811 under the guise better something than nothing will cause tremendous harm to the cause of advancing election integrity by instituting the hand counted paper ballot (HCPB) as the ONLY ballot of record.  Rep. Dennis Kucinich has offered legislation making at least federal elections subject to HCBP only as a first step in the right direction.

 

In Arizona, S.B. 1557, was passed and heralded as the most significant piece of election reform in the states history.  I worked on that bill and I testified in favor of the original bill, but when the final bill was twisted, perverted, and bastardized in its final form I predicted that it would make election integrity a farce in Arizona.  I was right!  Those politicians and elections officials in Arizona who manipulated the legislative process used the gutted bill to remove all sense of veracity and decency in the process of auditing the election.  I fear H.R. 811 will have the same result unless significant changes are made.  Better no legislation than bad legislation.

 

Finally, the debacle that is the U.S. Justice Department and the clear manipulation of U.S. Attorney’s for the purpose of controlling elections is further proof that Karl Rove is not done with plans to steal the next election and the next and the next.  If, with all this data, information, and evidence, we don’t have a Congress or an electorate that will make the necessary changes to the election processes in this country, well then, what’s the point?

by Mike Shelby (13 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 20 comments) on Saturday, Apr 14, 2007 at 12:59:46 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Behind the Scene Evidence

The evidence on Cuyahoga's 04 and 06 elections likely contributed to Vu's resignation, along with the Board of Elections.

Richard Hayes Phillips submitted evidence showing "60% of Cuyahoga's precincts reported more votes than ballots" he counted.  Photographic evidence was provided to him by various Ohio activists.

Election Science Institute also contributed to condeming evidence on Cuyahoga's electoral management duties: "the election system, in its entirety, exhibits shortcomings with extremely serious consequences..."  ESI found that hundreds of memory cards and voting machines went missing. 

Here's my article summarizing ESI's report and calling for Vu's removal from the field of elections. http://tinyurl.com/27lw8e 

by Rady Ananda (182 articles, 374 quicklinks, 49 diaries, 1718 comments [201 recommended, 2 rejected]) on Saturday, Apr 14, 2007 at 1:21:05 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Reply: Correction: 60 PRECINCTS

not 60%.  ~ Rady

by Rady Ananda (182 articles, 374 quicklinks, 49 diaries, 1718 comments [201 recommended, 2 rejected]) on Sunday, Apr 15, 2007 at 1:14:02 PM

Recommend  (0+)

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Tampa, FL - UnitedHealth to Enter Funeral Parlor Industry by James Dunham

Rothschild's Federal Reserve Must Be Abolished by Allen L Roland

Photo Essay: Thoughts for the Fourth of July: Talking the Talk and Walking the Walk for Peace by Mac McKinney

Israeli Embassy Correspondence Concerning Spirit of Humanity Capture Clarifies Centuries of Conflict by Meryl Ann Butler

Health Insurance Exec Whistleblower Wendell Potter Testifies Before Congress by Wendell Potter

Did Obama Appoint People With Track Record of Making Right Decisions? by Ralph Nader

The true face of politics as 467,000 jobs were shed by Mary MacElveen

Obama Has No Legal Authority For Afghan War by Sherwood Ross

Torture on the 4th of July by Lawrence Gist

Hypocritical Repugnicans Owe WJ Clinton an Apology by David Gray

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum