Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Why The Antiwar Left Should Support Republican Ron Paul in '08

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -

I must admit, I only agree with Texas Congressman Ron Paul on about 10 to 20% of his political stances.  Ron Paul is pro-Life, while I am pro-choice.  Paul believes universal health care is socialized medicine.  I believe some form of universal health coverage is essential for the U.S. to become as civilized as just about every other industrialized nation.  I was appalled when the Congress caved in to the Banking industry on a new bankruptcy law.  Paul voted for this atrocious bill.

And yet, with all the differences between my views and those of Mr. Paul, I plan on crossing over and voting for him in the GOP primary.  The reason is simple: Paul is the only candidate, save Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel, who recognizes the dangers the continuing expansion of the U.S. Empire poses to our freedoms and quality of life.  In other words, that 20% on which I agree with Candidate Paul is the 20% that will, more than any other factor, determine the quality of life the American people in the coming decades.

Paul is also the only candidate with the guts to ‘tell it like it is’ in regards to the so-called ‘war on terror’: the reason the U.S. is facing so many threats from terrorism is because of our interventionist foreign policy.  This interventionism, unfortunately, cannot be placed solely on the backs of the Republicans: from Korea to Vietnam to Haiti, Democratic politicians have participated in trying to micromanage the affairs of other countries.  In some cases, the U.S. has appeared to ‘succeed’ in choosing the leaders of these other nations.  But as was the case with the U.S. intervention in Iran in the 1950s, these ‘successes’ have engendered the kind of blowback that make it apparent that nonintervention would have been the best policy.

Paul’s program for success in Iraq and Afghanistan is simple: get out now.  This position is far more in line with the antiwar Left than the positions of any of the mainstream Democratic candidates.   From John Edwards to Hillary Clinton, the Democratic positions on the war depend on the latest poll numbers; Mr. Paul, on the other hand, has consistently held his position: occupation is the problem, not the solution, to terrorism.

I know there are some who will strongly disagree with my support for Paul.  They will point out to his seemingly ‘far right’, pro-corporate positions on several issues and on his support for unfettered access to firearms.  Some label them ‘kook’ positions.  But Paul is no kook and he is no right-winger.  He is a Libertarian Republican who has well thought out views and convictions that span decades.  Many of these positions are unlikely ever to become law:  I do not think Social Security, the IRS, the Federal Reserve and the CIA will ever be abolished.  Furthermore, it is unlikely the U.S. will ever go back to the gold standard, a position held by most Libertarians.

But, if Paul could somehow be elected President, I believe for the first time ever the American government would have a leader who would only deploy U.S. troops as an absolute last resort.  I believe we might actually have a chance of downsizing America’s imperial ambitions, or at least slowing them a bit.  And even if Paul does not win, as most experts predict he won’t, every vote for his candidacy is a vote for a return to, as George W. Bush disingenuously put it in 2000, a “more humble foreign policy”.

- Advertisement -

Personally, I would rather be on record as voting for someone of substance, like Mr. Paul, than a pure politician like Clinton, Edwards or Obama.   There is plenty of time to vote for the Lesser of Evils in the general election.  In my opinion, those who really want to change American foreign policy need to stand up now and cast their vote for someone who, though they may not agree with him on many other issues, is a staunch, unabashed antiwar candidate.

 

Mike Mejia is a freelance writer specializing in foreign policy and national security.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The (Attempted) Blackmailing of Jan Schakowsky

Sibel Edmonds and America's Secret War in Central Asia

The Silence of Henry Waxman

Ron Paul: The Pragmatic Choice

Tall Order: Can Obama and the Democrats Deliver?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
18 people are discussing this page, with 39 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Thanks for your article.  I applaud you! ... by Dan Druck on Saturday, Oct 6, 2007 at 11:33:42 AM
I fully second Dan's post! It's good to se... by Thomas Vietor on Saturday, Oct 6, 2007 at 12:56:03 PM
This is a well thought out and common sense approa... by J. Jones on Saturday, Oct 6, 2007 at 1:55:05 PM
Nice article Mike, I have been telling my democrat... by Jason Walls on Saturday, Oct 6, 2007 at 2:19:57 PM
I think alot of progressive or "left" vo... by John Slevin on Saturday, Oct 6, 2007 at 3:22:46 PM
"The current average contribution to the Ron ... by Melissa E on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 1:58:12 PM
Don't fret too much.  This is an issue th... by zenpiper on Saturday, Oct 6, 2007 at 5:36:18 PM
If you believe that those on the Left would consid... by ardee D. on Saturday, Oct 6, 2007 at 6:43:13 PM
I know I won't change your mind, so I won'... by J. Jones on Saturday, Oct 6, 2007 at 7:55:45 PM
That was supposed to be "Keynesian" inst... by J. Jones on Saturday, Oct 6, 2007 at 7:58:19 PM
but your support of one who would increase the fac... by ardee D. on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 9:03:30 AM
ardee D. criticizes Dr. Paul for not supporting Me... by M. Bennett on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 1:42:06 PM
Firstly for attempting to stifle free speech, seco... by ardee D. on Monday, Oct 8, 2007 at 4:32:47 PM
Much of the corruption stems from governments deal... by Thomas Vietor on Saturday, Oct 6, 2007 at 8:25:08 PM
Anyway, that's my take on socialism. I know so... by Thomas Vietor on Saturday, Oct 6, 2007 at 10:06:21 PM
and could have come directly from the mouth of Geo... by ardee D. on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 9:11:49 AM
 Very Good Article!!  A couple years ago... by shpshftr on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 1:41:44 AM
You obviously have no idea about Dr. Paul's id... by Thomas Vietor on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 9:35:38 AM
Whilst I couldn't disagree more with Mr Mejia ... by Henry Miller on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 10:30:55 AM
"At the moment, government is seizing more of... by Melissa E on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 2:15:19 PM
It's hard to believe that you could mention De... by Caronome on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 12:26:16 PM
Ron Paul just happens to be right about the war an... by John Hanks on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 12:39:02 PM
brings out his passionate and yet delusional ... by Joel S. Hirschhorn on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 2:21:39 PM
Joel S. Hirschhorn:  Dr. Paul was the Liberta... by M. Bennett on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 2:34:53 PM
Just how did he do??????  Had he ever run for... by Joel S. Hirschhorn on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 2:36:33 PM
 PresidentialCandidateVice PresidentialC... by Joel S. Hirschhorn on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 2:41:13 PM
Watch Cnn's Wolf B. interview RP the other nit... by SeamusMac on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 2:56:16 PM
That may be so, but it would be more of a commenta... by M. Bennett on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 3:26:25 PM
Furthermore, if 466863 popular votes received by a... by M. Bennett on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 5:32:14 PM
FYI - I have supported true progressive candidates... by SeamusMac on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 2:42:13 PM
and he is completely opposed to lobbyists, unlike ... by Thomas Vietor on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 3:52:27 PM
Ron Paul is a fraud. Why do you think Ron Paul has... by Ty on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 4:19:21 PM
Yeah right, Ron Paul's average donation in the las... by Thomas Vietor on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 5:09:15 PM
2007  Ron Paul speaks in favor of pork spendi... by Joel S. Hirschhorn on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 5:26:08 PM
I was getting a bit tired, not only at defending s... by ardee D. on Monday, Oct 8, 2007 at 4:41:03 PM
He's in favor of the earmekrs, not of the spen... by Thomas Vietor on Sunday, Oct 7, 2007 at 7:31:26 PM
Great, another Ron Paul supporter.  That just... by Mary in Oregon on Monday, Oct 8, 2007 at 7:18:29 PM
For example, I understand that Medicare operates a... by ardee D. on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2007 at 1:42:50 PM
   If you think that what we have now is... by Justin Offermann on Saturday, Oct 13, 2007 at 9:41:41 AM