Home
Refresh   Tag(s):
Add to My Group
May 5, 2007 at 15:37:18

View Ratings | Rate It

Only in an American Presidential Debate

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Matt Henderson (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Matt - Writer

In Thursday night’s Republican Presidential debate on MSNBC, 3 of the Republican candidates expressed something so shocking I almost couldn't believe it - that is, until I remembered whose party they hailed from.

Upon being asked if anyone on the stage “does not believe in evolution,” Senator Sam Brownback, Former Governor Mike Huckabee, and Representative Tom Tancredo raised their hands. That alone should spell an immediate end to their respective candidacies. It indicates that their minds have been so thoroughly poisoned by religious literalism - truly fundamentalism of the most dangerous kind - that they have lost touch with reality.

As if it needed repeating, there is no debate within the scientific community regarding the overwhelming validity of the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection. It is most unfortunate that a handful of religious extremists have created the illusion, in the public sphere, that there is anything to discuss as far as science is concerned.

What does need to be discussed, on the other hand, is the very nature of religious faith as a mode of knowing about the world. I submit to you that this is a clear case of faith having overstepped its bounds. Your faith should not require you to deny matters of overwhelming empirical fact. Faith operates within a different realm than that - a realm beyond the sensible world from which science extracts its data. As the late Daniel Patrick Moynihan once put it, “Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”

As prominent Harvard biologists Stephen Jay Gould and Edward O. Wilson have insisted, there is no necessary conflict between religion and science, presuming the former deals with “why” and the latter with “how.” Those trained in the analysis of physical data should not pretend to philosophical or literary expertise, and those trained in the tradition of attempts to interpret the human condition should not pretend to scientific expertise.

Quite simply, our 3 dear Republican candidates overstepped their bounds as men of faith, Thursday night, by dissenting on a matter on which they clearly don’t have the education to be able to intelligently opine.

Matt Henderson
Millersville, PA

Millersville ‘06, Philosophy & Political Science

— Posted by Matt Henderson

 

I hold bachelor of arts degrees in Philosophy and Political Science, as well as a minor in psychology.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

EVOLUTION & FAITH by Dave Reader / NM on Saturday, May 5, 2007 at 6:31:36 PM
Evolution doesn't need faith by Yaybob on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 7:11:39 PM
* by Dave Reader / NM on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 10:47:50 PM
Simple Faith for Us Simple Folks by cluelessfl on Saturday, May 5, 2007 at 6:46:03 PM
Debate evolves into Intelligent Design by Gustav Wynn on Saturday, May 5, 2007 at 11:32:45 PM
Nice one, padre by Yaybob on Monday, May 7, 2007 at 6:10:36 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum