Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (1 comment)

Playing Games with GIs Lives

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

Playing Games with GIs Lives
LM Johnson

I watched a report on NBC Evening News the other night. There was a very interesting, yet shocking investigative report by Lisa Myers that literally sent me over the edge.

One of the many problems for our troops is attacks by RPGs (Rocket-Propelled Grenades). These attacks have taken the lives of our sons and daughters. Earlier this year, General Dynamics announced they had completed testing of an Israeli system, named Raphael that builds a "hemispheric bubble" around vehicles, senses incoming RPGs and defends against them by intercepting and blowing them up. GD has field tested the system in Virginia. It is said to be 98% effective in completing its mission. According to Meyer's investigation, the Pentagon has officially blessed this program and its rapid deployment to our troops who need all the support we can give them.

However, officials at the Department of the Army are opposed to using this life-saving equipment. The reason? Because they have already awarded a $21 million contract to Raytheon to design and develop the same type of system and this would be a threat to that contract. No, I won't repeat that again. How could anyone in their logical thinking mind think this makes any sense at all? It sounds like a complete waste of taxpayer dollars, but more importantly, an overt and callous disregard for the lives of our nation's military forces in a war zone.

Both General Dynamics and Raytheon are among the top of a list of defense contractors. It should be noted, however, that William Swanson, CEO of Raytheon is also on the Pepperdine University Board of Regents (hmmm, I seem to remember that's where Ken Starr is now "working.") Is this a coincidence? What is the payoff and why is the Department of the Army reinventing the wheel?

We need to scream bloody murder to our Senators and Representatives about these callous and despicable actions on the part of the Department of the Army merely to protect a defense contractor, whose CEO makes around $36,000,000 a year.


Links to applicable articles:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14686871/ , Lisa Myers investigative report;
http://www.raytheon.com/newsroom/stellent/groups/public/documents/legacy_site/cms01_052438.pdf , Raytheon profile of William Swanson;
http://www.defense-update.com/products/t/trophy.htm , Defense-Update article (note this article is from Volume 1, 2004);
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=13 , CorpWatch article about Raytheon's position as one of the top defense contractors.

 

www.60sflowerchildredux.blogspot.com

Nutshell: I am a babyboomer, 60s hippie/flowerchild, Army veteran, and defender of truth and justice for all. Also a political and religious independent. My blog: www.60sflowerchildredux.blogger.com

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

ex army and you did not catch the implication? by Vulture on Wednesday, Sep 6, 2006 at 10:09:33 PM