![]() |
|
|
April 4, 2008 at 16:18:37
9/11: Where Barack Obama and Condi Rice Sound Alarmingly Alike by Kristen Breitweiser Page 1 of 2 page(s) |
|
|
Barack Obama appeared on MSNBC's Hardball last night and was asked about the way he would handle the 3 a.m. phone call. The transcript: They're heading for the Capitol. What do you do? OBAMA: Well, look, I am hesitant to engage in hypotheticals like that, because...MATTHEWS: Let me give you a scene that may face you in the next year or two, where the national security adviser calls you at 3:00 in the morning and tells that you a couple of jet -- commercial jets have been hijacked. And they believe it is al Qaeda. And, as we know, al Qaeda always tries a second time. They tried for the World Trade Center after '93. They came back in '01.
MATTHEWS: But it has been predictable.
OBAMA: Oh, well, the--I don't think anybody predicted 9/11. And, so, we don't know what kinds of circumstances are going to come up.
Yup. That's right, Barack Obama glibly stated that he didn't "think anybody predicted 9/11."
Some thoughts:
1. Maybe Obama needs a tutorial from former Vice Chairman of the 9/11 Commission, Lee Hamilton, who just endorsed him yesterday. Heck, even Hamilton knows and has to acknowledge that 9/11 was predictable.
Not that Obama conferring with Hamilton should give any of us warm, fuzzy feelings since Lee Hamilton is largely responsible for the 9/11 Commission's Final Report being a total whitewash.
To put it mildly, as Vice Chair for the 9/11 Commission, Hamilton was not interested in transparency, he was not interested in accountability, and he was certainly not interested in telling the truth to the American public. So why is a guy like Hamilton so interested in Obama being president?
Take further Hamilton's words of endorsement for Obama where Hamilton said, "Obama will strengthen our ability to use all the tools of American power, and relentlessly promote the American values of freedom and justice for all people. (Remember those words, folks, "power" and "relentlessly promote" and recognize that they have nothing to do with the sort of foreign policy Obama is currently trying to sell to the American public.)
2. Perhaps Obama might better strengthen his image of having a handle on national security issues by not sounding so much like the disgraceful, incompetent former Bush Administration National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice.
Recall that Ms. Rice stated that "I don't think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon; that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile."
In other words, that before 9/11 nobody in our (entire) intelligence community could have predicted that something like 9/11 could happen. (i.e. the Bush administration's 9/11 talking point)
I am not even going to bother listing the hundreds of cites/articles/studies/reports/military exercises, drills/testimonials/PDB's/SEIB's or even television shows that disprove Rice's statement. I will just mention my personal favorite -- the August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Briefing titled, "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in the U.S."
1 | 2
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
|
| 2 comments |
|
No more Republocrats
Obama's support for the "war on terror" and "9/11" myths is a major negative, as is his being backed by the oil industry Fact check: Obama and oil money (and Clinton & McCain), as are Clinton and McCain, and all 3 are also backed by the parasitic Federal Reserve and financial industry Financial Coup d’Etat Bill Clinton has been lying- claiming the whole important thing about 9/11 is that we were attacked bv Al Qaeda, not acknowledging all the "coincidental" "failures" of standard procedures and common sense that permitted and facilitated the attacks success Clinton, Obama and McCain will perpetuate the current system where corrupt private interests get served over the public interest by Better World Order (4 articles, 568 quicklinks, 39 diaries, 1111 comments [56 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Saturday, Apr 5, 2008 at 9:39:38 PM
|
|
Reply: and elections are meaningless without paper ballots
voting on and hand-counting paper ballots in the local precincts with publicly accountable ballot chain of custody from the printer to the election is the most secure way to conduct elections. Transparent elections give the public confidence in the results, no one should have to go on faith, and certainly not on faith that notoriously unreliable and easily hackable evoting machines with secret software controlled by unaccountable private interests who've given many indications they're corrupt are actually conducting an election where every vote is counted BradBlog.com BlackBoxVoting.org ElectionDefenseAlliance.org VelvetRevolution.US by Better World Order (4 articles, 568 quicklinks, 39 diaries, 1111 comments [56 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Saturday, Apr 5, 2008 at 10:16:22 PM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |